Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
5 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,906 Year: 4,163/9,624 Month: 1,034/974 Week: 361/286 Day: 4/13 Hour: 1/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Do we affect the" physical " indepentent of the laws of physics
sidelined
Member (Idle past 5938 days)
Posts: 3435
From: Edmonton Alberta Canada
Joined: 08-30-2003


Message 18 of 148 (291258)
03-01-2006 3:01 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by 2ice_baked_taters
02-23-2006 2:21 AM


2ice-baked-taters
I am a force that does things at will and in many ways not according to any known physical laws.
Your will is a function of your brain and as such is physical in nature. Also free will is not necessarily the case since the brain readies for an action before a conscious decision to act occurs.
Benjamin Libet - Wikipedia

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by 2ice_baked_taters, posted 02-23-2006 2:21 AM 2ice_baked_taters has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 21 by 2ice_baked_taters, posted 03-01-2006 11:19 PM sidelined has replied

  
sidelined
Member (Idle past 5938 days)
Posts: 3435
From: Edmonton Alberta Canada
Joined: 08-30-2003


Message 22 of 148 (291362)
03-02-2006 1:52 AM
Reply to: Message 21 by 2ice_baked_taters
03-01-2006 11:19 PM


2ice_baked_taters
What the will is cannot be defined by science. though there have been feeble attempts.
If free will has no definition then just what the heck are you talking about here.
I am a force that does things at will and in many ways not according to any known physical laws.
{italics mine}

This message is a reply to:
 Message 21 by 2ice_baked_taters, posted 03-01-2006 11:19 PM 2ice_baked_taters has not replied

  
sidelined
Member (Idle past 5938 days)
Posts: 3435
From: Edmonton Alberta Canada
Joined: 08-30-2003


Message 49 of 148 (293966)
03-10-2006 11:48 AM
Reply to: Message 47 by 2ice_baked_taters
03-10-2006 11:30 AM


2ice_baked_taters
We speak of forces in science all the time that we can only identify by the evidence they leave behind. What big leap is required to consider my suggestion?
By demonstating that this statement
By obeying these laws we in turn can have a profound and unpredictable effect on the physical world
is valid. How can we establish that something youclaim to be "unpredictable" can have a "profound effect" as you espouse? Should we just take you at your word or should we examine the claim?
Perhaps you would care to give us an example of how this can affect the physical?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 47 by 2ice_baked_taters, posted 03-10-2006 11:30 AM 2ice_baked_taters has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 51 by 2ice_baked_taters, posted 03-11-2006 11:21 AM sidelined has replied

  
sidelined
Member (Idle past 5938 days)
Posts: 3435
From: Edmonton Alberta Canada
Joined: 08-30-2003


Message 73 of 148 (295078)
03-14-2006 1:59 AM
Reply to: Message 51 by 2ice_baked_taters
03-11-2006 11:21 AM


2ice_baked_taters
So you say. The difficulty you have is to show the evidence that your statement is indeed valid by logical connection between your assertion that there is a "force of me" that, in fact, affect physical phenomena,
and the forces that physical phenomena operate by.
How does this force manifest its abilities to physically manipulate events in the world?
This message has been edited by sidelined, Tue, 2006-03-14 12:02 AM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 51 by 2ice_baked_taters, posted 03-11-2006 11:21 AM 2ice_baked_taters has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 81 by 1.61803, posted 03-14-2006 3:23 PM sidelined has not replied

  
sidelined
Member (Idle past 5938 days)
Posts: 3435
From: Edmonton Alberta Canada
Joined: 08-30-2003


Message 102 of 148 (307901)
04-30-2006 11:21 AM
Reply to: Message 100 by 2ice_baked_taters
04-29-2006 9:52 PM


2ice_baked_taters
You accept electromagnetism because we have found ways to measure and detect it. But still something you cannot show me. It is not a physical thing
Take a dinner fork, bend the inner two prongs 90 degrees and then stick the fork into a wall socket in your home.After you recover from the tingle produced by this action come back here and let us know if the experience you have in indicative of a physical thing or if it is all just in your head.
For gravity step off a chair and ask yourself what is the reason for you falling to the floor and just why you stop at the floor and not continue on down.Are there forces involved or perhaps it is an illusion somehow?
The closer we look at the physics the further our erroneous assumptions are from the physical and the closer we get to understanding the actual structure of things.
It is just as physical as ever it is merely removed from our normal perception of it. Since our senses deal with the statistical actions of vast numbers of atoms we build a picture through our senses of an averaging of the overall contributions of individual atoms. That the world ultimately breaks down to the laws of probability is not obvious at the scale of our experience unless we are careful in our examination of the world.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 100 by 2ice_baked_taters, posted 04-29-2006 9:52 PM 2ice_baked_taters has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 105 by 2ice_baked_taters, posted 04-30-2006 3:08 PM sidelined has replied

  
sidelined
Member (Idle past 5938 days)
Posts: 3435
From: Edmonton Alberta Canada
Joined: 08-30-2003


Message 108 of 148 (308003)
04-30-2006 5:34 PM
Reply to: Message 105 by 2ice_baked_taters
04-30-2006 3:08 PM


2ice_baked_taters
See my response to percy.
I was addressing your response to percy. You said
You accept electromagnetism because we have found ways to measure and detect it. But still something you cannot show me. It is not a physical thing
I asked you to perform certain experiments in order to have you get an understanding of the physical nature of the forces of gravity and electromagnetism and have these become clear in your mind. Failing this I would expect you to counter with a hypothesis to explain why you feel that these phenomena are not physical.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 105 by 2ice_baked_taters, posted 04-30-2006 3:08 PM 2ice_baked_taters has not replied

  
sidelined
Member (Idle past 5938 days)
Posts: 3435
From: Edmonton Alberta Canada
Joined: 08-30-2003


Message 128 of 148 (310067)
05-07-2006 6:08 PM
Reply to: Message 123 by 2ice_baked_taters
05-06-2006 3:11 PM


Re: Definition of Force
2ice_baked_taters
I am currently exerting a force upon you and others here that is evident by the effect the force is having.
You are not exerting a force rather, you are having an influence as a result of the choice of a human being reading your passages.
Unlike the result of a force the response of people to the influence of your statements is a choice that they have. All that read these lines are not required by a "law of nature" to answer back. You are confusing the science term of "force" which is defined as a mass acceleration with a colloquial term concerning influence or persuasion in a conversation.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 123 by 2ice_baked_taters, posted 05-06-2006 3:11 PM 2ice_baked_taters has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 129 by 2ice_baked_taters, posted 05-08-2006 12:09 PM sidelined has not replied
 Message 135 by cavediver, posted 05-13-2006 5:41 AM sidelined has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024