Well then let us come to an understanding with this force business.
For real!
It would appear to me that it may only be possible to express "force" as it is "used" in physics in a non writen or non verbal context and only be clearly understood in this form in math.
I agree, this is the way that 'force' should be expressed. Especially in a
science forum. Which, by definition, uses the description of force that you just described.
Every time any of you have attempted to describe force to me you have had to cross your line. That just illustrates to me that the definition of force you are trying to convey is narrow and limited.
But that is the point. If we are gonna
talk type about 'force', we should all use a
well defined definition, even if that defintion is 'narrow and limited'.
Now, when you type (from the OP):
quote:
I am a force that does things at will and in many ways not according to any known physical laws.
If we are gonna use the
accepted defintion of force, then this statement is incorrect. I don't think that you can do anything that is not 'according to any known physical laws'.
quote:
In fact it can be said that the force that is “us” generates it’s own set of changing laws called beliefs
But, according to the 'accpeted definition', these things you describe are not forces.
quote:
Perhaps thinking of us in terms of an energy force will allow science to have a better glimpse at that which is “us”.
Actually, delimiting the definition of 'force' worsens our glimpse at that which is 'us', but that is just my opinion. Perhaps you can convince me otherwise.
™ Version 4.2