Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,886 Year: 4,143/9,624 Month: 1,014/974 Week: 341/286 Day: 62/40 Hour: 3/4


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Atheism, a dangerous idea?
kongstad
Member (Idle past 2898 days)
Posts: 175
From: Copenhagen, Denmark
Joined: 02-24-2004


Message 103 of 241 (328726)
07-04-2006 11:12 AM
Reply to: Message 84 by riVeRraT
07-03-2006 1:45 PM


Re: Moral standards
riverrat writes:
But when I read the bible, I do not find anyway that I good back up a racist point of view.
One could easily say to a Christian who was using the bible to back his own personal racism, "what about love one an other?"
Yes, but Christians DO use the bible to back racism. They also use it to back opposition against abortion and stem cell research, to fight teaching evolution and preventing vaccination against cervical cancer etc.
On the other hand Christians use the bible to fight racism, to support pro-choice, to support stem cell research, to teach science, and to argue for medical breakthroughs.
So it seems, by you own admission that we should be scared of Christians since we cannot now what moral standards they follow.
The point is, that I am sure that you believe that the moral lessons you learn from the bible are absolutely true, and they set a standard for all Christians, indeed for all of mankind, but the Christian living down the street thinks the same but disagrees with you on many points.
For those of us who do not believe that there are any absolute moral standards (and this is not all atheists, nor only atheists who hold this position), there is no difference between atheists morality as a group and theists, or indeed Christians as a group. We ALL differ from each other on minor an major points with regards to moral questions, and we all share many more moral standards.
/Soren
Edited by kongstad, : Bad splleing

This message is a reply to:
 Message 84 by riVeRraT, posted 07-03-2006 1:45 PM riVeRraT has not replied

  
kongstad
Member (Idle past 2898 days)
Posts: 175
From: Copenhagen, Denmark
Joined: 02-24-2004


Message 120 of 241 (328872)
07-05-2006 3:33 AM
Reply to: Message 101 by mike the wiz
07-04-2006 11:01 AM


Re: An Argument and explanation
I have been told on many occasions that salvation is given solely by God, and by his grace alone.
Simply by believing in the risen Christ, this grace shall be given. we are all sinners, and can do nothing to earn our way into heaven.
You seem to disagree, but do you really mean to say that the many many christians who hold this belief are not christians?
If not, then your argument falls apart:
To expound on that conclusion, if an atheist can escape an earthly law then he can potentially do wrong, but a Christian cannot potentially do this if he believes in a just Christ, which by definition, he does, because even if he escapes earthly law he knows he can't escape God.
A christian would know that being just and not sinning would not help him achieve grace - so there is no reason for a christian - that is one who believes in the risen christ - to act morally. His grace is independent of his actions, and only dependant on his belief. that was I believe one of the points - if not the central point - of Martin Luthers epiphany, giving birth to the protestant doctrines, and the evangical sects of today.
So only christians who believe in grace through actions comply with your argument, but then again a lot of atheists believe that they should never do wrong, just like the catholic, so the catholics faith in a God is irrelevant to his morals.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 101 by mike the wiz, posted 07-04-2006 11:01 AM mike the wiz has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 121 by iano, posted 07-05-2006 6:24 AM kongstad has replied

  
kongstad
Member (Idle past 2898 days)
Posts: 175
From: Copenhagen, Denmark
Joined: 02-24-2004


Message 157 of 241 (329791)
07-08-2006 4:16 AM
Reply to: Message 151 by riVeRraT
07-06-2006 9:30 AM


Re: Moral standards
This just proves my point that it is debatable based on a book that Christians follow. If I was an atheist, we would not be having this discussion.
So the whole point is that christians all have their own moral systems, but they like to justify them by refrencing a book.
Atheists have their own moral systems too, but they just justify them without referencing a book.
And this makes atheism dangerous?
Its abundantly clear that the good book can support any moral stance, so for heathens like me its very hard to see why atheists should be singled out as dangerous?
Anyway you actually can discuss ethics without using the bible, Muslim holy text or The tales of Tom Sawyer and Huckleberry Finn.
We do it all the time, discussing the consequences of actions, and claiming them to be wrong based on the particulars. If we disagree we can argue, until we reach the basic points we disagree on, and then either convince the other on our point of view or just agree to disagree.
Nothing is added by referring to holy texts, or Gods, as can be seen by the simple fact that even among the same christian denomination, people disagree on the most basic moral tenets.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 151 by riVeRraT, posted 07-06-2006 9:30 AM riVeRraT has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 158 by robinrohan, posted 07-08-2006 8:33 PM kongstad has replied
 Message 182 by riVeRraT, posted 07-10-2006 7:17 AM kongstad has replied

  
kongstad
Member (Idle past 2898 days)
Posts: 175
From: Copenhagen, Denmark
Joined: 02-24-2004


Message 180 of 241 (330051)
07-09-2006 10:11 AM
Reply to: Message 158 by robinrohan
07-08-2006 8:33 PM


non sequitur
Atheism is extremely dangerous. Name one successful atheist civilization.
Either you are trying to change the subject, or I am just to stupid to follow you.
Are you claiming if no civilization holds a particular worldview (or in this case, is missing a theological dimension), then the worldview, or lack of theological dimension is dangerous?
Please elaborate?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 158 by robinrohan, posted 07-08-2006 8:33 PM robinrohan has not replied

  
kongstad
Member (Idle past 2898 days)
Posts: 175
From: Copenhagen, Denmark
Joined: 02-24-2004


Message 181 of 241 (330057)
07-09-2006 10:19 AM
Reply to: Message 121 by iano
07-05-2006 6:24 AM


Re: An Argument and explanation
So you disagree with the other christians here?
Atheism is not dangerous?
You see most atheists, like most people, detest cruel acts, Most people act morally because they want to, and only psychopaths do so only because of fear of discovery, or the sanctions of authority.
Edited by kongstad, : splleing

This message is a reply to:
 Message 121 by iano, posted 07-05-2006 6:24 AM iano has not replied

  
kongstad
Member (Idle past 2898 days)
Posts: 175
From: Copenhagen, Denmark
Joined: 02-24-2004


Message 186 of 241 (330724)
07-11-2006 6:47 AM
Reply to: Message 182 by riVeRraT
07-10-2006 7:17 AM


Re: Moral standards
So claiming to be a christian is not enough to assure that people do not scare you. You must withhold your judgement until you can observe peoples acts?
A Christian who doesn't follow at least the golden rule, is no better than an atheist who doesn't follow it either.
So what is the difference between people claiming to be christians and people claiming to be atheists?
In both cases, you must withhold judgement until you can evaluate their actions, so their professed beliefs, or lack of beliefs, should not logically have an effect on how you judge them!
On the other hand, if I saw an Atheist doing the same thing, I probably wouldn't even question it. He has his own moral code, and can do whatever he wants. He has not subscribed to any moral code, other than the one he invents in his mind.
Well if he claims to be against prostitution you can judge him, and if you believe prostitution is wrong, you can judge him. Do you really feel that people can do whatever they want?
That is way to broad of a statement. Some of the core values of Christianity are way to obvious to be thinking that Christians or any other religion can go and make up any moral they want.
Ok, but looking around I see christians using the bible to defend homosexual marriage, and to condemn it. To defend the right to choose, and to condemn it. To defend wars and to condemn them. To condemne universal healthcare and to defend it. To defend free speech and to condemn it. To assert the equal value of women, and to reject it. To defend rascism, and to reject it.
But other than you feel that christians share which core values?
In my oppinon all your arguing just leads to the fact that you must judge each person on his own, and that a persons faith, or lack of it, in no way tells you how this person will act.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 182 by riVeRraT, posted 07-10-2006 7:17 AM riVeRraT has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 187 by ramoss, posted 07-11-2006 8:57 AM kongstad has not replied
 Message 192 by riVeRraT, posted 07-12-2006 7:55 AM kongstad has replied

  
kongstad
Member (Idle past 2898 days)
Posts: 175
From: Copenhagen, Denmark
Joined: 02-24-2004


Message 193 of 241 (331062)
07-12-2006 8:09 AM
Reply to: Message 192 by riVeRraT
07-12-2006 7:55 AM


Re: Moral standards
Yes I understand what you are saying, but I still don't get it.
If someone claims to be Christian, then they should at least be trying to be Christian, no? Otherwise they are a liar, or do not know what it is to really be Christian.
Yes I'll grant you that
If you believe in Jesus, you will make an attempt at trying to be like Him. Of course there are no perfect Christians, but there should be some distinction between a person claiming to be Christian, and the rest of the world. The bible even teaches us this, this is how we know, and can say things like, hey that guy over there must really love God, because of his actions.
Well here we part ways
As it has been established in this thread, a christian trying to be a christian does in no way say what the morals of the person is.
We have established that christians cannot agree one when killing is justified and when it isn't, whether abortion is allowed or not etc.
But even more fundemental, you just repeated that we should judge the person claiming to be a christian >>on his actions<<, so it is not his claim of theism that makes him not dangerous, but in stead his actions.
Now if you know of a persons actions, then the persons beliefs are not fundemental to this judgement. Do you belief the persons actions to be just? Then you can judge the person to be just. What does a professed belief in christ change?
So I do not understand what you have to fear from atheists, that you could not fear from a person claiming to be a christian!
Have you any experience with atheists behaving in ways that make you fear them in particular?
I know of christian killers, rapists and pedophiles, but that doesnt make me fear people claiming to be christians.
Furthermore I do not know why you wouldnt judge an atheist? You have no expectations as to how a persons should act?
I expect all people to behave with acceptance and tolerance in general, and to try not to knowingly harm others unnecessarilly. And I hold people to these standards whatever their religion or lack of. And generlly, they live up to this.
Atheists no less than theists.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 192 by riVeRraT, posted 07-12-2006 7:55 AM riVeRraT has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 194 by riVeRraT, posted 07-12-2006 10:30 PM kongstad has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024