Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
1 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,913 Year: 4,170/9,624 Month: 1,041/974 Week: 368/286 Day: 11/13 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Lying For Jesus Award
jar
Member (Idle past 424 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 46 of 279 (379709)
01-25-2007 9:55 AM
Reply to: Message 44 by Phat
01-25-2007 8:52 AM


Re: No True Christian Fallacy
If I understand you correctly, all who call themselves Christian become representatives of Christ. (Or in other terms, anointed of God)
Uh, no. I think you will have to look pretty hard to even find anything close to that.
First I would say that the term "anointed of God" may be great in some hymnal but other than that is pretty meaningless.
Second, what I said is that all who call themselves Christian become representatives of Christianity.
Having been so charged, it is our collective responsibility to make sure that our image is not tarnished or tainted in any way. We are far from perfect, but we are to acknowledge this..(As King David did, reluctantly when he got caught) expose our imperfections to other Christians, turn away from our sins, bad behaviors, and faulty ideologies and resolve to behave better tomorrow, right?
Hell no. I think the expose our imperfections to other Christians is mostly Fundamentalist, Evangelical and Pentecostal braggadocio.
What we need to do is speak out and condemn the Televangelists who promote YEC, bigotry, hate and exclusion. If we are not speaking out against the End Timers, the Defense of Marriage folk, the ID or YEC proselytizers, the 700 Club and Trinity Broadcasting and Sky Angel and all the rest of the Cult of Ignorance, then we are part of the problem, not part of the solution.

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

This message is a reply to:
 Message 44 by Phat, posted 01-25-2007 8:52 AM Phat has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 47 by Phat, posted 01-25-2007 10:40 AM jar has replied

  
Phat
Member
Posts: 18350
From: Denver,Colorado USA
Joined: 12-30-2003
Member Rating: 1.0


Message 47 of 279 (379718)
01-25-2007 10:40 AM
Reply to: Message 46 by jar
01-25-2007 9:55 AM


Re: No True Christian Fallacy
What exactly is this Cult of Ignorance?
  • Is it the ones who believe in a literal Virgin Birth?
  • Is it the ones who believe that not all are saved?
  • Is it not true that condemning the beliefs of others makes you also guilty? Do you actually think you behave better than they do in every area of your life?
    I realize that you are condemning behaviors and not necessarily beliefs, per se. But I wonder about this Cult Of Ignorance assertion. You seem to have a disdain for the Pentecostals.

  • This message is a reply to:
     Message 46 by jar, posted 01-25-2007 9:55 AM jar has replied

    Replies to this message:
     Message 48 by jar, posted 01-25-2007 11:34 AM Phat has replied

      
    jar
    Member (Idle past 424 days)
    Posts: 34026
    From: Texas!!
    Joined: 04-20-2004


    Message 48 of 279 (379736)
    01-25-2007 11:34 AM
    Reply to: Message 47 by Phat
    01-25-2007 10:40 AM


    Re: No True Christian Fallacy
    What exactly is this Cult of Ignorance?
  • Is it the ones who believe in a literal Virgin Birth?
  • Is it the ones who believe that not all are saved?
  • Nah. Both of those are totally unimportant and personal.
    It is those who oppose really learning science and what the REALITY of the universe teaches us. It is those who would discriminate against homosexuals by denying them basic human rights.
  • Is it not true that condemning the beliefs of others makes you also guilty? Do you actually think you behave better than they do in every area of your life?
  • Guilty of what? You do realize that behaving better than the average Televangelist is not really a difficult or great accomplishment?
    I realize that you are condemning behaviors and not necessarily beliefs, per se. But I wonder about this Cult Of Ignorance assertion. You seem to have a disdain for the Pentecostals.
    Well not just Pentecostals but much of the Evangelical, Charismatic and Fundamentalist movements as well. Also I think disdain is far to weak a word, abject pity or disgust would likely be better.

    Aslan is not a Tame Lion

    This message is a reply to:
     Message 47 by Phat, posted 01-25-2007 10:40 AM Phat has replied

    Replies to this message:
     Message 49 by Phat, posted 01-25-2007 12:03 PM jar has replied

      
    Phat
    Member
    Posts: 18350
    From: Denver,Colorado USA
    Joined: 12-30-2003
    Member Rating: 1.0


    Message 49 of 279 (379747)
    01-25-2007 12:03 PM
    Reply to: Message 48 by jar
    01-25-2007 11:34 AM


    Re: No True Christian Fallacy
    Do you have no qualms about generalizing? I mean, don't you have any Pentacostal friends? Or Charismatic friends? or..or..Evangelical friends? And IF not, was it your fault for not reaching out and attempting to reason with them? Or is it their fault for not accepting you as a fellow Christian and seeking to understand you?

    This message is a reply to:
     Message 48 by jar, posted 01-25-2007 11:34 AM jar has replied

    Replies to this message:
     Message 50 by jar, posted 01-25-2007 12:06 PM Phat has not replied
     Message 51 by ringo, posted 01-25-2007 2:19 PM Phat has not replied
     Message 59 by anastasia, posted 01-25-2007 11:30 PM Phat has not replied

      
    jar
    Member (Idle past 424 days)
    Posts: 34026
    From: Texas!!
    Joined: 04-20-2004


    Message 50 of 279 (379750)
    01-25-2007 12:06 PM
    Reply to: Message 49 by Phat
    01-25-2007 12:03 PM


    Re: No True Christian Fallacy
    You are friends with individuals, not with movements.

    Aslan is not a Tame Lion

    This message is a reply to:
     Message 49 by Phat, posted 01-25-2007 12:03 PM Phat has not replied

      
    ringo
    Member (Idle past 442 days)
    Posts: 20940
    From: frozen wasteland
    Joined: 03-23-2005


    Message 51 of 279 (379805)
    01-25-2007 2:19 PM
    Reply to: Message 49 by Phat
    01-25-2007 12:03 PM


    Re: No True Christian Fallacy
    Phat writes:
    Do you have no qualms about generalizing?
    One of my cousins is married to the son of a Nazi general.
    Do I think less of her for that? Or him?
    Is it "over-generalizing" to say that Nazis make Germany look bad?

    Help scientific research in your spare time. No cost. No obligation.
    Join the World Community Grid with Team EvC

    This message is a reply to:
     Message 49 by Phat, posted 01-25-2007 12:03 PM Phat has not replied

    Replies to this message:
     Message 58 by anastasia, posted 01-25-2007 11:22 PM ringo has not replied

      
    riVeRraT
    Member (Idle past 446 days)
    Posts: 5788
    From: NY USA
    Joined: 05-09-2004


    Message 52 of 279 (379904)
    01-25-2007 7:10 PM
    Reply to: Message 43 by Quetzal
    01-25-2007 8:28 AM


    Re: Who represents who?
    Jar is just trying (in his own illimitable way), to get "True Christians" off their collective butts and clean their own house.
    Yes, I am on board with that, and your view of the whole thing is 100% realistic. You probably do not have a prejudive bone in ya.
    I am not really disagreeing with jar's outlook on the whole thing, I am just pointing out the hypocrisy of those who claim to be in the "know".

    This message is a reply to:
     Message 43 by Quetzal, posted 01-25-2007 8:28 AM Quetzal has not replied

      
    riVeRraT
    Member (Idle past 446 days)
    Posts: 5788
    From: NY USA
    Joined: 05-09-2004


    Message 53 of 279 (379907)
    01-25-2007 7:12 PM
    Reply to: Message 44 by Phat
    01-25-2007 8:52 AM


    Re: No True Christian Fallacy
    If I understand you correctly, all who call themselves Christian become representatives of Christ.
    But not everyone who says Lord Lord will go to heaven, or something like that.

    This message is a reply to:
     Message 44 by Phat, posted 01-25-2007 8:52 AM Phat has not replied

      
    riVeRraT
    Member (Idle past 446 days)
    Posts: 5788
    From: NY USA
    Joined: 05-09-2004


    Message 54 of 279 (379908)
    01-25-2007 7:14 PM
    Reply to: Message 45 by jar
    01-25-2007 9:35 AM


    Re: Who represents who?
    Well, no, it is honesty. And I doubt that you will ever see it.
    You and I both know that the second I mention the word Christ, or something biblical, immediatly I am a fundie, blah blah blah.
    The truth is, they are hypocrites.
    I have nothing further to say.

    This message is a reply to:
     Message 45 by jar, posted 01-25-2007 9:35 AM jar has replied

    Replies to this message:
     Message 55 by jar, posted 01-25-2007 7:19 PM riVeRraT has not replied

      
    jar
    Member (Idle past 424 days)
    Posts: 34026
    From: Texas!!
    Joined: 04-20-2004


    Message 55 of 279 (379911)
    01-25-2007 7:19 PM
    Reply to: Message 54 by riVeRraT
    01-25-2007 7:14 PM


    Re: Who represents who?
    You and I both know that the second I mention the word Christ, or something biblical, immediatly I am a fundie, blah blah blah.
    So when I mention Christ or something Biblical I am Fundy?
    Sorry but that defense doesn't wash either.

    Aslan is not a Tame Lion

    This message is a reply to:
     Message 54 by riVeRraT, posted 01-25-2007 7:14 PM riVeRraT has not replied

      
    Rob 
    Suspended Member (Idle past 5879 days)
    Posts: 2297
    Joined: 06-01-2006


    Message 56 of 279 (379966)
    01-25-2007 10:52 PM
    Reply to: Message 20 by Phat
    01-20-2007 6:48 AM


    Re: Faux Pas
    Persuasion is achieved by actions rather than words.
    Perhpas that is why I have only witnessed battles at EVC and no conversions (by anyone).
    Unless you are only giving credit to those of you with animated Avatars...

    This message is a reply to:
     Message 20 by Phat, posted 01-20-2007 6:48 AM Phat has not replied

      
    anastasia
    Member (Idle past 5983 days)
    Posts: 1857
    From: Bucks County, PA
    Joined: 11-05-2006


    Message 57 of 279 (379970)
    01-25-2007 11:12 PM
    Reply to: Message 37 by jar
    01-24-2007 1:56 PM


    Re: Who represents who?
    jar writes:
    When folk form an opinion of Christian they base it on what is visible. What is visible are all the Christian Televangelists, the Pastors in the Pulpit preaching bigotry, the crooks and conmen like Dr. Dino and Jimmy Swaggart and Jim Bakker and Oral Roberts and Pat Robertson and Jerry Falwell.
    All depends on who is doing the looking. I prefer to look at the countless saints who have done everything in their power to be great examples of christianity. I look at Mother Teresa, Miguel Pro, Damien De Veuster, Maximillian Kolbe. I find saints even in our midst. Don't sell out a proud heritage over a few rotten apples. What is visible is not what is important. It is the humble, unrecognized acts which make the person.

    This message is a reply to:
     Message 37 by jar, posted 01-24-2007 1:56 PM jar has replied

    Replies to this message:
     Message 60 by Quetzal, posted 01-26-2007 7:43 AM anastasia has replied
     Message 61 by jar, posted 01-26-2007 9:02 AM anastasia has replied

      
    anastasia
    Member (Idle past 5983 days)
    Posts: 1857
    From: Bucks County, PA
    Joined: 11-05-2006


    Message 58 of 279 (379973)
    01-25-2007 11:22 PM
    Reply to: Message 51 by ringo
    01-25-2007 2:19 PM


    Re: No True Christian Fallacy
    Ringo writes:
    Is it "over-generalizing" to say that Nazis make Germany look bad?
    Forget Germany. Do Nazis make Germans look bad? I hope not. And I also hope Hovind and such don't make Christians look bad. Chrisitanity is no more real than its members, and a christian should be judged as individually as a German. Better yet, not judged at all.

    This message is a reply to:
     Message 51 by ringo, posted 01-25-2007 2:19 PM ringo has not replied

    Replies to this message:
     Message 82 by nator, posted 01-29-2007 11:46 AM anastasia has replied

      
    anastasia
    Member (Idle past 5983 days)
    Posts: 1857
    From: Bucks County, PA
    Joined: 11-05-2006


    Message 59 of 279 (379974)
    01-25-2007 11:30 PM
    Reply to: Message 49 by Phat
    01-25-2007 12:03 PM


    Re: No True Christian Fallacy
    Phat writes:
    Do you have no qualms about generalizing? I mean, don't you have any Pentacostal friends? Or Charismatic friends? or..or..Evangelical friends? And IF not, was it your fault for not reaching out and attempting to reason with them? Or is it their fault for not accepting you as a fellow Christian and seeking to understand you?
    I have been friends with atheists, satanists, Wiccans, gays, drug addicts, prostitutes, you name it. The people who have most rejected me in life were fellow christians. Do I judge christianity? Of course not, because I am christian.

    This message is a reply to:
     Message 49 by Phat, posted 01-25-2007 12:03 PM Phat has not replied

      
    Quetzal
    Member (Idle past 5902 days)
    Posts: 3228
    Joined: 01-09-2002


    Message 60 of 279 (380034)
    01-26-2007 7:43 AM
    Reply to: Message 57 by anastasia
    01-25-2007 11:12 PM


    Re: Who represents who?
    All depends on who is doing the looking. I prefer to look at the countless saints who have done everything in their power to be great examples of christianity. I look at Mother Teresa, Miguel Pro, Damien De Veuster, Maximillian Kolbe. I find saints even in our midst. Don't sell out a proud heritage over a few rotten apples. What is visible is not what is important. It is the humble, unrecognized acts which make the person.
    On the contrary, it is the visible manifestations of Christianity that do get noticed. Unless you are intimately familiar with the actions of the folks that are doing good work, those of us who are non-Christians are constantly bombarded with negative examples. How many people have even heard of the Silesian Missions, for instance? With the exception of a couple of screw-ups (about par for development organizations), these folks have quietly been going about doing excellent work in remote areas in anti-trafficking in persons, skills and capacity building, poverty alleviation, etc, among the poorest of the poor in the developing world - all without demanding that the people they help also buy a bible?
    What we DO see and hear are people like the Catholic Archbishop of South Africa who not only demanded that contraception be banned as a sin (in a region where inept, corrupt or otherwise marginal governments are facing an impossible population vs resource crisis), but proclaimed loudly that HIV was not only not a disease, but was in fact the Will of God. We're supposed to take what away from that?
    When Christians squash the evil done in the name of Christianity - or at least loudly denounce the practitioners - then maybe you'll have a case. In the meantime, fairly or unfairly, y'all are going to be tarred with the same brush. That's how it works.

    This message is a reply to:
     Message 57 by anastasia, posted 01-25-2007 11:12 PM anastasia has replied

    Replies to this message:
     Message 62 by anastasia, posted 01-27-2007 12:22 AM Quetzal has replied

      
    Newer Topic | Older Topic
    Jump to:


    Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

    ™ Version 4.2
    Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024