EvC Forum: www.conservapedia.com

Email This Thread

Newer Topic | Older Topic

Author

Topic: www.conservapedia.com - What do you think?

Dan Carroll

Inactive Member

Normal Thread Display

Message 92 of 167 (388290)
03-05-2007 2:02 PM

The real question is... do you think we can get Ray to write them an article on the Great Pyramids?

"I know some of you are going to say 'I did look it up, and that's not true.' That's 'cause you looked it up in a book. Next time, look it up in your gut."
-Stephen Colbert

Replies to this message:
	Message 93 by kuresu, posted 03-05-2007 2:35 PM		Dan Carroll has replied

Dan Carroll

Inactive Member

Normal Thread Display

Message 94 of 167 (388300)
03-05-2007 2:50 PM

Reply to: Message 93 by kuresu
03-05-2007 2:35 PM

Funny thing is, I don't think they'll be able to keep the crazies off their site. Maybe not Ray specifically, but there are many more like him out there.

They've set themselves up as the place you can go to scream about Jesus because Wikipedia won't let you. It won't be especially stunning if the crazies start crawling out of the woodwork to go scream about Jesus.

"I know some of you are going to say 'I did look it up, and that's not true.' That's 'cause you looked it up in a book. Next time, look it up in your gut."
-Stephen Colbert

This message is a reply to:
	Message 93 by kuresu, posted 03-05-2007 2:35 PM		kuresu has not replied

Replies to this message:
	Message 95 by CK, posted 03-05-2007 3:54 PM		Dan Carroll has not replied

Dan Carroll

Inactive Member

Normal Thread Display

Message 126 of 167 (388718)
03-07-2007 12:24 PM

Reply to: Message 125 by Utopia
03-07-2007 12:14 PM

Re: Their "objective" take on the ACLU

I had no idea that Baldwin wrote in all caps when he wanted to emphasize something. Conservapedia is such a professional endeavor.

"I know some of you are going to say 'I did look it up, and that's not true.' That's 'cause you looked it up in a book. Next time, look it up in your gut."
-Stephen Colbert

This message is a reply to:
	Message 125 by Utopia, posted 03-07-2007 12:14 PM		Utopia has not replied

Dan Carroll

Inactive Member

Normal Thread Display

Message 135 of 167 (388740)
03-07-2007 1:37 PM

Reply to: Message 130 by Chiroptera
03-07-2007 1:15 PM

Re: Their "objective" take on the ACLU

I love this passage from the ACLU discussion:

Joshua, your 20 cases is out of how many? 20,000? That would be 0.1%. That is very rare indeed. Let's be factual about this. The ACLU brings at least 100 cases against prayer, the Ten Commandments, statutes, Boy Scouts, Intelligent Design, etc., for every case brought on the other side. Be honest about the ratios here.

Yes, let's be factual. First, 0.1% of all their cases are in defense of Christians. Then there are 100 other cases for every one defense of Christians. Which means it's up to 1%, in the same paragraph. All while pleading that the other guy be reasonable and honest about The Facts.

Good gravy. The mind just boggles.

"I know some of you are going to say 'I did look it up, and that's not true.' That's 'cause you looked it up in a book. Next time, look it up in your gut."
-Stephen Colbert

This message is a reply to:
	Message 130 by Chiroptera, posted 03-07-2007 1:15 PM		Chiroptera has not replied

Date format: mm-dd-yyyy

Timezone: ET (US)

Newer Topic | Older Topic

Do Nothing Button

3 online now:	Omnivorous, PaulK, Theodoric
Newest Member:	ChatGPT
Post Volume:	Total: 916,916 Year: 4,173/9,624 Month: 1,044/974 Week: 3/368 Day: 3/11 Hour: 2/0