Understanding through Discussion

Essential Links ▼

FAQ

Rules

Search ▼

February and beyond, 2013

Index of even older POTM topics

Bob Altemeyer - The Authoritarians (1.32 MB)

National Academy of Science - Science, Evolution, and Creationism (3.16 MB)

John Woodmorappe - Radiometric Geochronology Reappraised (3.35MB)

Defining Reasonableness Online: A Case Study of an Internet Forum
about the Creation / Evolution Controversy

John A Davison - A Prescribed Evolutionary Hypothesis

Charlie Rose Show - Discussion About Charles Darwin (w/ EO Wilson & James Watson)

Marina Chicurel - Can Organisms Speed Their Own Evolution?

Wall Street Journal - Intelligent Design Intrigues, but Is It Science?

Creation/Evolution Glossary

Geology Glossary

Reference Library

Message Coding Help ►

Posts of the Month ►

Report Discussion Problems

Discuss Moderation

Thread Reopen Requests

Topic Proposal Issues

Suspensions and Bannings

Bugs, Problems, Suggestions

Document Library ►

QuickSearch

EvC Forum active members: 35 (9258 total)

2 online now:	PaulK, Tangle
Newest Member:	theMadArtist
Post Volume:	Total: 922,889 Year: 3,211/6,935 Month: 41/506 Week: 40/46 Day: 0/8 Hour: 0/0

EvC Forum ⇒ Side Orders ⇒ Coffee House ⇒

www.conservapedia.com - What do you think?

Thread ▼ Details

Email This Thread

Newer Topic | Older Topic

Author

Topic: www.conservapedia.com - What do you think?

PaulK

Member

Posts: 18302

Joined: 01-10-2003

Member Rating: 4.7

Normal Thread Display

Message 118 of 167 (388439)
03-06-2007 1:55 AM

Reply to: Message 110 by crashfrog
03-05-2007 10:01 PM

Re: Wiki bias

I think that's the problem. t.o doesn't include enough falsehoods. It must be biased because it tells too much truth.

This message is a reply to:
	Message 110 by crashfrog, posted 03-05-2007 10:01 PM		crashfrog has not replied

Date format: mm-dd-yyyy

Timezone: ET (US)

Newer Topic | Older Topic

Do Nothing Button