|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total) |
| |
ChatGPT | |
Total: 916,902 Year: 4,159/9,624 Month: 1,030/974 Week: 357/286 Day: 0/13 Hour: 0/0 |
Thread ▼ Details |
|
Thread Info
|
|
|
Author | Topic: Science Disproves Evolution | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
jar Member (Idle past 423 days) Posts: 34026 From: Texas!! Joined: |
You should likely read what Glen himself has to say about a young earth.
Why do Young Earth Creationists need to lie? Immigration has been a problem Since 1607!
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
bluescat48 Member (Idle past 4219 days) Posts: 2347 From: United States Joined: |
Pahu: It sounds like you would like nothing better. It is understandable that you would prefer to be free of scientific facts that disprove evolution. That is usually the response of those who don’t want their pet erroneous presuppositions threatened. So much for the free exchange of ideas, right? So come up with a legitimate fact then. There is no better love between 2 people than mutual respect for each other
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
AdminNosy Administrator Posts: 4754 From: Vancouver, BC, Canada Joined: |
Each of the so-called facts that you cut an paste have been shredded. You more or less ignore the responses and post more junk.
It is not honest discussion to behave this way. The image that it projects of you is someone who doesn't even understand the material he is copying. Please focus on ONE thing and finish the discussion. We have already had all this stuff posted here over and over. We don't need you to do it again. If you are willing to defend the material do so! If you are not do not post it. Thanks. You have been indulged long enough time to act like a big boy now.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dr Adequate Member (Idle past 314 days) Posts: 16113 Joined: |
For the last 150 years, the age of the Earth, as assumed by evolutionists, has been doubling at roughly a rate of once every 15 years. In fact, since 1900 this age has multiplied by a factor of 100! As you know this to be a lie, perhaps you should stop reciting it.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
anglagard Member (Idle past 866 days) Posts: 2339 From: Socorro, New Mexico USA Joined: |
Pahu writes: For the last 150 years, the age of the Earth, as assumed by evolutionists, has been doubling at roughly a rate of once every 15 years. In fact, since 1900 this age has multiplied by a factor of 100! My 1974 General Geophysics textbook (Physics and Geology by Jacobs, Russell, and Wilson) says 4.55 billion years. 2008-1974=34 years. So, let's see, are you lying? Read not to contradict and confute, not to believe and take for granted, not to find talk and discourse, but to weigh and consider - Francis Bacon The more we understand particular things, the more we understand God - Spinoza
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dr Adequate Member (Idle past 314 days) Posts: 16113 Joined: |
Rather than making Creation scientists look foolish, these facts confirm their conclusions. Then why do creationists themselves denounce the moon dust lie? Evedently AnswerInGenesis think that it makes creationists look foolish. And for once, they are right. Here are creationists Rush and Snelling:
quote: The fact remains that scientists were concerned because they thought the universe was billions of years old, which would result in much more dust, given the measurements recording the annual dust entering the earth’s atmosphere. No direct measurement had been made at the time where your phoney figures originate. It has now. See Love and Brownlee, "A Direct Measurement of the Terrestrial Mass Accretion Rate of Cosmic Dust", Science 262, 1993.
By the way, have you ever noticed how quickly dust accumulates on your furniture? This is amusing. Do you suppose that the dust on furniture is cosmic dust, or what? Edited by Dr Adequate, : No reason given.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
sidelined Member (Idle past 5937 days) Posts: 3435 From: Edmonton Alberta Canada Joined: |
jar
Why do Young Earth Creationists need to lie? Truth in the YEC camp died out 6000 years ago it seems.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pahu Member (Idle past 5955 days) Posts: 33 Joined: |
Nosy: Each of the so-called facts that you cut an paste have been shredded. You more or less ignore the responses and post more junk.
Pahu: I don’t recall seeing any shredding of the facts I have shared. I have seen a lot of denial and alternate explanations and opinions. Nosy: It is not honest discussion to behave this way. The image that it projects of you is someone who doesn't even understand the material he is copying.Please focus on ONE thing and finish the discussion. We have already had all this stuff posted here over and over. We don't need you to do it again. If you are willing to defend the material do so! If you are not do not post it. Thanks. You have been indulged long enough time to act like a big boy now. Pahu: If I accurately understand your rules, I am not allowed to present facts, only opinions. Therefore, my defense of my position is I am right and you are wrong”in my humble opinion!
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pahu Member (Idle past 5955 days) Posts: 33 Joined: |
Dr Adequate: As you know this to be a lie, perhaps you should stop reciting it.
Pahu: I know it to be the absolute truth”in my humble opinion.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pahu Member (Idle past 5955 days) Posts: 33 Joined: |
Anglagard: My 1974 General Geophysics textbook (Physics and Geology by Jacobs, Russell, and Wilson) says 4.55 billion years. 2008-1974=34 years. So, let's see, are you lying?
Pahu: Don’t you know you are breaking the rules when you introduce outside information? Shame on you! No I am not lying, I am right”in my humble opinion.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
JonF Member (Idle past 197 days) Posts: 6174 Joined: |
Calculations show that the growing upward bulges of large crater floors on the Moon should occur to their current extent in only 10,000 to 10,000,000 years (a). As Glen Morton writes now, at Accomplishments : Publications, Oil fields and Patents:
quote: And from Is There Really Scientific Evidence for a Young Earth? quote: Not properly accounting for the temperature dependence of viscosity is a fatal flaw. That claim is shredded.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ringo Member (Idle past 441 days) Posts: 20940 From: frozen wasteland Joined: |
Pahu writes: If I accurately understand your rules, I am not allowed to present facts, only opinions. Not even close. You have been asked to produce facts. For example, you have been asked repeatedly to present the creationist determination of the age of the earth. Do that. “Faith moves mountains, but only knowledge moves them to the right place” -- Joseph Goebbels
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
jar Member (Idle past 423 days) Posts: 34026 From: Texas!! Joined: |
Pahu writes: For the last 150 years, the age of the Earth, as assumed by evolutionists, has been doubling at roughly a rate of once every 15 years. In fact, since 1900 this age has multiplied by a factor of 100! Let's look. Here is a link to some age estimates from before 1900. Your assertion is refuted. Since your sources are shown time after time to be lying to you, why would you think they are not lying about God? (they are you know, follow them and you will go to Hell!) Immigration has been a problem Since 1607!
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pahu Member (Idle past 5955 days) Posts: 33 Joined: |
Dr Adequate: Then why do creationists themselves denounce the moon dust lie? Evedently AnswerInGenesis think that it makes creationists look foolish. And for once, they are right.
Pahu: They are wrong, I am right”in my humble opinion. Dr Adequate: Here are creationists Rush and Snelling: Pahu: There you go breaking the rules again. Dr Adequate: No direct measurement had been made at the time where your phoney figures originate. Pahu: They are not phony, they are accurate”in my humble opinion. Dr Adequate: It has now. See Love and Brownlee, "A Direct Measurement of the Terrestrial Mass Accretion Rate of Cosmic Dust", Science 262, 1993. Pahu: Can’t do that, it breaks the rules. Remember, opinions only. Dr Adequate: This is amusing. Do you suppose that the dust on furniture is cosmic dust, or what? Pahu: Yes”in my humble opinion.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
jar Member (Idle past 423 days) Posts: 34026 From: Texas!! Joined: |
No, the rule is NOT opinions only. Why much you continue to repeat falsehoods?
The RULE is that you need to be able to defend what you post; you, using reason, logic and reality. The problem is that you really are totally ignorant when it comes to science and since you seem unable to examine evidence and make conclusions, it is likely you are going to Hell. Immigration has been a problem Since 1607!
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024