Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,879 Year: 4,136/9,624 Month: 1,007/974 Week: 334/286 Day: 55/40 Hour: 0/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Science Disproves Evolution
anglagard
Member (Idle past 864 days)
Posts: 2339
From: Socorro, New Mexico USA
Joined: 03-18-2006


Message 30 of 196 (442321)
12-20-2007 6:14 PM
Reply to: Message 27 by Pahu
12-20-2007 5:56 PM


Re: Pahu, step up to the plate.
Pahu writes:
Scott Tremaine is one of numerous scientists published in peer review science journals who have discovered facts that disprove evolution.
Since you made this assertion, I'm sure it would be no problem to show us what 'facts' Tremaine 'discovered' which 'disprove' evolution in the appropriate thread.

Read not to contradict and confute, not to believe and take for granted, not to find talk and discourse, but to weigh and consider - Francis Bacon
The more we understand particular things, the more we understand God - Spinoza

This message is a reply to:
 Message 27 by Pahu, posted 12-20-2007 5:56 PM Pahu has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 35 by Pahu, posted 12-20-2007 6:53 PM anglagard has not replied

  
anglagard
Member (Idle past 864 days)
Posts: 2339
From: Socorro, New Mexico USA
Joined: 03-18-2006


Message 116 of 196 (444575)
12-29-2007 10:13 PM
Reply to: Message 111 by Pahu
12-29-2007 8:09 PM


Re: Moon Recession = another PRATT
Pahu writes:
Malcolm Bowden
27 February 2000
Did you know he believes the universe rotates around the earth?
http://homepage.ntlworld.com/malcolmbowden/Geocexpl.htm
One among many reasons I find it difficult to take him seriously.

Read not to contradict and confute, not to believe and take for granted, not to find talk and discourse, but to weigh and consider - Francis Bacon
The more we understand particular things, the more we understand God - Spinoza

This message is a reply to:
 Message 111 by Pahu, posted 12-29-2007 8:09 PM Pahu has not replied

  
anglagard
Member (Idle past 864 days)
Posts: 2339
From: Socorro, New Mexico USA
Joined: 03-18-2006


Message 135 of 196 (445166)
01-01-2008 12:18 PM
Reply to: Message 134 by Pahu
01-01-2008 11:57 AM


Re: Moon Dust and Debris
Every six months or so, some YEC chooses to embarrass the creationist community with the moon dust argument.
From AIG's Arguments we think creationists should NOT use at Arguments to Avoid Topic | Answers in Genesis :
quote:
“Moon-dust thickness proves a young moon.”
For a long time, creationists claimed that the dust layer on the moon was too thin if dust had truly been falling on it for billions of years. They based this claim on early estimates”by evolutionists”of the influx of moon dust, and worries that the moon landers would sink into this dust layer. But these early estimates were wrong, and by the time of the Apollo landings, NASA was not worried about sinking. So the dust layer thickness can’t be used as proof of a young moon (or of an old one, either). See Moon-dust argument no longer useful and Moon dust and the age of the solar system (Technical).
Sheesh, your own people beg you not to make them look like fools by using this old PRATT.
So what can we expect from you next? Perhaps men have one more rib than women?

Read not to contradict and confute, not to believe and take for granted, not to find talk and discourse, but to weigh and consider - Francis Bacon
The more we understand particular things, the more we understand God - Spinoza

This message is a reply to:
 Message 134 by Pahu, posted 01-01-2008 11:57 AM Pahu has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 136 by Taz, posted 01-01-2008 1:29 PM anglagard has not replied
 Message 139 by Pahu, posted 01-01-2008 4:17 PM anglagard has replied

  
anglagard
Member (Idle past 864 days)
Posts: 2339
From: Socorro, New Mexico USA
Joined: 03-18-2006


Message 143 of 196 (445332)
01-01-2008 7:37 PM
Reply to: Message 139 by Pahu
01-01-2008 4:17 PM


Re: Moon Dust and Debris
Pahu writes:
Anglagard, I am aware of the information contained in your quote from AIG. I disagree with their cautionary conclusion. If you will take another look at what I shared on the subject, you may notice that the fears of a deep thickness of dust were only removed after instruments were sent to the moon to measure it, before the moon landing.
Any such fears were pure speculation until actual evidence was obtained to support or contradict such an assertion. That is how science works.
The fact remains that scientists were concerned because they thought the universe was billions of years old, which would result in much more dust, given the measurements recording the annual dust entering the earth’s atmosphere. The fact that only a couple of inches of dust was found proves the moon and earth are much younger, since using the same measurements, that amount of dust would be expected to accumulate in no more than 10,000 years.
The answer is obvious. Despite having 1/6 the gravity of the earth, grain compaction would still exist, particularly given extensive lengths of time. So what is under such moon dust other than compacted moon dust? The metal dome of the moon people?
Rather than making Creation scientists look foolish, these facts confirm their conclusions.
Creation 'scientists' can't even agree on what constitutes an embarrassment and what constitutes simple ignorance of basic physics.
Science disproves evolution.
Which is why 99.85% of all working geo and bio scientists in the US, the people who actually know what they are talking about, agree with the ToE. Obviously you are mistaken, a position even your fellow creationists at AIG agree with in regard to any 'moon dust' nonsense.
By the way, have you ever noticed how quickly dust accumulates on your furniture?
The reason dust accumulates indoors here is because, unlike the moon, the earth has an atmosphere. Didn't you know even that?

Read not to contradict and confute, not to believe and take for granted, not to find talk and discourse, but to weigh and consider - Francis Bacon
The more we understand particular things, the more we understand God - Spinoza

This message is a reply to:
 Message 139 by Pahu, posted 01-01-2008 4:17 PM Pahu has not replied

  
anglagard
Member (Idle past 864 days)
Posts: 2339
From: Socorro, New Mexico USA
Joined: 03-18-2006


Message 155 of 196 (445602)
01-03-2008 1:51 AM
Reply to: Message 148 by Pahu
01-02-2008 9:39 PM


Re: Crater Creep
Pahu writes:
For the last 150 years, the age of the Earth, as assumed by evolutionists, has been doubling at roughly a rate of once every 15 years. In fact, since 1900 this age has multiplied by a factor of 100!
My 1974 General Geophysics textbook (Physics and Geology by Jacobs, Russell, and Wilson) says 4.55 billion years. 2008-1974=34 years. So, let's see, are you lying?

Read not to contradict and confute, not to believe and take for granted, not to find talk and discourse, but to weigh and consider - Francis Bacon
The more we understand particular things, the more we understand God - Spinoza

This message is a reply to:
 Message 148 by Pahu, posted 01-02-2008 9:39 PM Pahu has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 160 by Pahu, posted 01-03-2008 12:46 PM anglagard has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024