Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,909 Year: 4,166/9,624 Month: 1,037/974 Week: 364/286 Day: 7/13 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Before Big Bang God or Singularity
ICANT
Member
Posts: 6769
From: SSC
Joined: 03-12-2007
Member Rating: 1.7


Message 164 of 405 (453143)
02-01-2008 2:15 PM
Reply to: Message 162 by tesla
02-01-2008 2:09 PM


Re: Re=T=0
Hi tesla,
tesla writes:
it always was.
thats the start.
So right on Genesis 1:1 Declares it.
God Bless,

This message is a reply to:
 Message 162 by tesla, posted 02-01-2008 2:09 PM tesla has not replied

ICANT
Member
Posts: 6769
From: SSC
Joined: 03-12-2007
Member Rating: 1.7


Message 168 of 405 (453152)
02-01-2008 2:35 PM
Reply to: Message 160 by Rahvin
02-01-2008 1:54 PM


Re-Beginning
Hi Rahvin,
Rahvin writes:
The Big Bang was not the "beginning" of the Universe as you're stating. Nothing was "created in the Big Bang. The Bang is what we call the expansion of the Universe from the Singularity to what we see today - not a scientific verification of your "creation ex nihilo" fantasies.
So the Big Bang was not the beginning. I know that, I got it from a reliable source Genesis 1:1.
But I found this:
The page you were looking for doesn't exist (404)
Hawking on the beginning.
Public Lectures - The Beginning of Time
In this lecture, I would like to discuss whether time itself has a beginning, and whether it will have an end. All the evidence seems to indicate, that the universe has not existed forever, but that it had a beginning, about 15 billion years ago. This is probably the most remarkable discovery of modern cosmology. Yet it is now taken for granted.
I also found this:
Best Paytm Cash Earning Games in India | Free Apps to Win Cash online
For thousands of years, people have wondered about the universe. Did it stretch out forever or was there a limit? And where did it all come from? Did the universe have a beginning, a moment of creation? Or had the universe existed forever? The debate between these two views raged for centuries without reaching any conclusions. Personally, I'm sure that the universe began with a hot Big Bang. But will it go on forever? If not, how will it end? I'm much less certain about that. The expansion of the universe spreads everything out, but gravity tries to pull it all back together again. Our destiny depends on which force will win." ”Stephen Hawking
How did the universe really begin?
Most astronomers would say that the debate is now over: The universe started with a giant explosion, called the Big Bang. The big-bang theory got its start with the observations by Edwin Hubble that showed the universe to be expanding. If you imagine the history of the universe as a long-running movie, what happens when you show the movie in reverse? All the galaxies would move closer and closer together, until eventually they all get crushed together into one massive yet tiny sphere. It was just this sort of thinking that led to the concept of the Big Bang.
The Big Bang marks the instant at which the universe began, when space and time came into existence and all the matter in the cosmos started to expand. Amazingly, theorists have deduced the history of the universe dating back to just 10 -43 second (10 million trillion trillion trillionths of a second) after the Big Bang. Before this time all four fundamental forces”gravity, electromagnetism, and the strong and weak nuclear forces”were unified, but physicists have yet to develop a workable theory that can describe these conditions.
So what am I supposed to believe. That is the reason I keep asking the question. Where did it come from?
God Bless,

"John 5:39 (KJS) Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 160 by Rahvin, posted 02-01-2008 1:54 PM Rahvin has not replied

ICANT
Member
Posts: 6769
From: SSC
Joined: 03-12-2007
Member Rating: 1.7


Message 169 of 405 (453158)
02-01-2008 3:05 PM
Reply to: Message 166 by Modulous
02-01-2008 2:17 PM


Re: Re=T=0
Hi Mod,
Modulous writes:
Ask where did the point 3 inches from your nose 5 seconds ago came from.
Nice, But it existed there regardless to where my nose was at that moment.
Modulous writes:
The question should not be 'where did the singularity come from?'
Maybe, But since according to cavediver it cannot exist
Message 34 Message 111
There are three messages That I state according to cavediver and Hawking that the singularity could not have existed in the first place to expand into the universe.
Thus I claimed in Message 91 according to my OP.
My original question:
Message 1
In this topic I would like to discuss which is the best explanation for the origin of the universe. God or the Singularity including the Big Bang.
Message 91
Premise 1: Singularity including the Big Bang is the best explanation for the orgin of the universe. Falasified
Premise 2: God is the best explanation for the orgin of the universe.
Maybe, Maybe not but not falsified. This is the scientific answer.
I believe that premise has been proven to me because I received it from a reliable source. God. Genesis 1:1
Now my conclusions in premise 1 are based upon what Hawking says and what cavediver said.
Would you care to refute my conclusions that are based upon those two learned men or are we going to dance around here for another 130 plus post with my conclusions still not refuted.
God Bless,
Edited by ICANT, : No reason given.

"John 5:39 (KJS) Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 166 by Modulous, posted 02-01-2008 2:17 PM Modulous has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 171 by New Cat's Eye, posted 02-01-2008 3:32 PM ICANT has not replied
 Message 172 by cavediver, posted 02-01-2008 3:34 PM ICANT has replied
 Message 174 by Modulous, posted 02-01-2008 3:42 PM ICANT has replied

ICANT
Member
Posts: 6769
From: SSC
Joined: 03-12-2007
Member Rating: 1.7


Message 176 of 405 (453175)
02-01-2008 4:00 PM
Reply to: Message 172 by cavediver
02-01-2008 3:34 PM


Re: Re=T=0
Hi cavediver,
cavediver writes:
When a gentleman approaches with his underpants on his head, a pencil up each nostril, and announces 'wibble', one's first reaction is typically not 'I must refute this'
I thought I read somewhere on here that this was a creationist tatic. If you can't say something of substance insult or scream Goddit.
Look I have never claimed to know anything about science. God is a different story.
I may be dumb but I am not stupid.
I took your word's and concluded the singularity could not exist according to your answers to the questions I asked.
I took Hawking's word's and concluded the singularity could not exist according to those statements.
So you are telling me I am not capable of taking your answers and the statements of Hawking and coming to a correct conclusion.
If that is the case would you please take your my questions and your answers and go through them one at a time and explain whatever it is that I am not understanding.
God Bless,

"John 5:39 (KJS) Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 172 by cavediver, posted 02-01-2008 3:34 PM cavediver has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 178 by cavediver, posted 02-01-2008 4:22 PM ICANT has replied

ICANT
Member
Posts: 6769
From: SSC
Joined: 03-12-2007
Member Rating: 1.7


Message 177 of 405 (453177)
02-01-2008 4:07 PM
Reply to: Message 174 by Modulous
02-01-2008 3:42 PM


Re:Models
Hi Mod,
Message 1
ICANT writes:
In this topic I would like to discuss which is the best explanation for the origin of the universe. God or the Singularity including the Big Bang.
Which is the best explanation for the orgin of the universe?
God
or
Singularity including the Big Bang.
This is what I am discussing.
You want to discuss another model start a thread and I will look at it.
God Bless,

"John 5:39 (KJS) Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 174 by Modulous, posted 02-01-2008 3:42 PM Modulous has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 179 by Modulous, posted 02-01-2008 4:32 PM ICANT has replied

ICANT
Member
Posts: 6769
From: SSC
Joined: 03-12-2007
Member Rating: 1.7


Message 180 of 405 (453193)
02-01-2008 4:43 PM
Reply to: Message 179 by Modulous
02-01-2008 4:32 PM


Re-Models
Hi Mod,
Modulous writes:
Is the universe as we know it, self-existing?
Did it originate out of a higher dimensional 'universe' which itself is self-existing?
Did it originate out of the creative influence of a self-existing deity?
Did it originate out of the creative influence of a deity who was in turn created by a self-existent mega-deity?
How can you discuss these when everything stops at T=0.
Modulous writes:
If you are going to compare models, make sure they are comparable first
Mod the last time I checked this was EvC. Evolution verses Creation.
God Bless,
Edited by ICANT, : selling

"John 5:39 (KJS) Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 179 by Modulous, posted 02-01-2008 4:32 PM Modulous has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 182 by Modulous, posted 02-01-2008 5:05 PM ICANT has replied

ICANT
Member
Posts: 6769
From: SSC
Joined: 03-12-2007
Member Rating: 1.7


Message 181 of 405 (453198)
02-01-2008 4:48 PM
Reply to: Message 178 by cavediver
02-01-2008 4:22 PM


Re=T=0
Hi cavediver,
cavediver writes:
I can do that, but I need you to promise to stop running off with mad conclusions - in my first post in this thread, I presented quite a bit of information and given the responses I sorely regretted getting involved in this thread. I'm doing my VAT return, so time is at a premium this weekend.
Whenever.
But this past Tuesday night and Wednesday morning would have been the best time when we averaged over 1,000 visitors for several hours.
God Bless,

"John 5:39 (KJS) Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 178 by cavediver, posted 02-01-2008 4:22 PM cavediver has not replied

ICANT
Member
Posts: 6769
From: SSC
Joined: 03-12-2007
Member Rating: 1.7


Message 185 of 405 (453234)
02-01-2008 5:57 PM
Reply to: Message 182 by Modulous
02-01-2008 5:05 PM


Re-Orgin
Hi Mod,
Modulous writes:
The reason that the discussion isn't moving forward is because we are trying to explain why the big bang model is not about the origins of the universe. If you want to discuss actual models about the origins of the universe, then that is great. If you want to insist that a model that is not proposed to explain the origin of the universe does not explain the origin of the universe - then you go right ahead...you'll excuse the rest of us for not being interested and trying to steer the conversation into the real world.
I can understand the delima whih my sticking to my point. Which is
Premise 1: Singularity including the Big Bang is the best explanation for the orgin of the universe.
"we are trying to explain why the big bang model is not about the origins of the universe."
But if I do a Yahoo search on Big Bang theory I get:
This
Which says this
The big bang theory states that at some time in the distant past there was nothing. A process known as vacuum fluctuation created what astrophysicists call a singularity. From that singularity, which was about the size of a dime, our Universe was born.
and this Which says this
The Big Bang Theory is the dominant scientific theory about the origin of the universe. According to the big bang, the universe was created sometime between 10 billion and 20 billion years ago from a cosmic explosion that hurled matter and in all directions.
and this which says:
Big Bang Theory, currently accepted explanation of the beginning of the universe. The big bang theory proposes that the universe was once extremely compact, dense, and hot. Some original event, a cosmic explosion called the big bang, occurred about 13.7 billion years ago, and the universe has since been expanding and cooling.
and this which says:
The Question
(Submitted November 08, 1997)
What is the big bang theory? What do you believe?
The Answer
The big bang theory is the theory that the universe started from a single point, and has been expanding ever since.
This has been well-established by observations, such as the apparent movement of galaxies away from us, and the cosmic microwave background radiation believed to be the leftover light from the big bang.
The evidence for a big bang having taken place about 15 to 20 billion years ago is overwhelming, so I naturally believe that it is the case.
However, if your real question is "why did the big bang happen in the first place?" then that ceases to be an astronomical question, but a religious one.
Some astronomers, who are religious, argue that the big bang theory confirms the existence of God and the basic elements of the creation story as told in the Bible. First came light, then the heavens, then the Earth ...
However, many other scientists do not. Scientists, like people in most any profession, have a vast diversity of religious beliefs. Some of us attend houses of worship, others do not. Some of us consider ourselves very religious, others consider ourselves staunch atheists. Just because we study astronomy does not mean we have any more agreement as to the ``why'' questions than anyone else.
On the other hand, it is safe to say that as scientists we can agree on an approach to learning about nature and the universe. This approach is one of using observations to test theories. And when a theory has been tested as much as the big bang theory, with each test reconfirming its validity, then we believe that it likely true -- at least more true than those theories which have failed the observational tests.
Good luck on your quest for the truth.
Jonathan Keohane
for Ask an Astrophysicist
Then I get serious and I find this:
Best Paytm Cash Earning Games in India | Free Apps to Win Cash online
Which says:
“For thousands of years, people have wondered about the universe. Did it stretch out forever or was there a limit? And where did it all come from? Did the universe have a beginning, a moment of creation? Or had the universe existed forever? The debate between these two views raged for centuries without reaching any conclusions. Personally, I’m sure that the universe began with a hot Big Bang. But will it go on forever? If not, how will it end? I’m much less certain about that. The expansion of the universe spreads everything out, but gravity tries to pull it all back together again. Our destiny depends on which force will win.” ”Stephen Hawking
I am told be serious that is a PBS article quoting Hawking.
So I find this:
The page you were looking for doesn't exist (404)
Hawking on the beginning.
Public Lectures - The Beginning of Time
In this lecture, I would like to discuss whether time itself has a beginning, and whether it will have an end. All the evidence seems to indicate, that the universe has not existed forever, but that it had a beginning, about 15 billion years ago. This is probably the most remarkable discovery of modern cosmology. Yet it is now taken for granted.
Hawking said:" but that it had a beginning, about 15 billion years ago. This is probably the most remarkable discovery of modern cosmology. Yet it is now taken for granted."
Now this man is held in very high regard around here.
Who or what am I supposed to believe you or him?
Do you see my delima?
God Bless,

"John 5:39 (KJS) Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 182 by Modulous, posted 02-01-2008 5:05 PM Modulous has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 199 by Modulous, posted 02-01-2008 6:55 PM ICANT has replied

ICANT
Member
Posts: 6769
From: SSC
Joined: 03-12-2007
Member Rating: 1.7


Message 192 of 405 (453251)
02-01-2008 6:26 PM
Reply to: Message 188 by molbiogirl
02-01-2008 6:06 PM


Re: Orgin
Hi molbiogirl,
mobiogirl writes:
You seem to think that a singularity is a very, very tiny dot that then exploded into the universe.
Now you know better than that. I believe God did it however He did it.
I don't care if it was as big as the Andromeda Galaxy. It had to come from somewhere or from and absence of anything.
God Bless,

"John 5:39 (KJS) Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 188 by molbiogirl, posted 02-01-2008 6:06 PM molbiogirl has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 194 by molbiogirl, posted 02-01-2008 6:33 PM ICANT has not replied

ICANT
Member
Posts: 6769
From: SSC
Joined: 03-12-2007
Member Rating: 1.7


Message 193 of 405 (453255)
02-01-2008 6:31 PM
Reply to: Message 186 by Son Goku
02-01-2008 5:59 PM


Re: Orgin
Hi Son,
Son Goku writes:
That is were things stand. The Big Bang describes the early history of the universe, but not how/why it exists. However the Big Bang is correct, as observations support it. There is no better theory of the early universe.
Why does Hawking say: "All the evidence seems to indicate, that the universe has not existed forever, but that it had a beginning, about 15 billion years ago. This is probably the most remarkable discovery of modern cosmology. Yet it is now taken for granted."
Is he wrong?
God Bless,

"John 5:39 (KJS) Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 186 by Son Goku, posted 02-01-2008 5:59 PM Son Goku has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 196 by molbiogirl, posted 02-01-2008 6:43 PM ICANT has replied
 Message 240 by Son Goku, posted 02-02-2008 4:28 AM ICANT has replied

ICANT
Member
Posts: 6769
From: SSC
Joined: 03-12-2007
Member Rating: 1.7


Message 195 of 405 (453258)
02-01-2008 6:35 PM
Reply to: Message 190 by molbiogirl
02-01-2008 6:14 PM


Re: ... In the beginning
Hi molbiogirl,
molbiogirl writes:
No physicist would argue that "something came out of nothing".
Well please enlighten us as to where it came from then?
God Bless,
Edited by ICANT, : No reason given.

"John 5:39 (KJS) Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 190 by molbiogirl, posted 02-01-2008 6:14 PM molbiogirl has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 197 by molbiogirl, posted 02-01-2008 6:45 PM ICANT has not replied

ICANT
Member
Posts: 6769
From: SSC
Joined: 03-12-2007
Member Rating: 1.7


Message 198 of 405 (453266)
02-01-2008 6:45 PM
Reply to: Message 191 by cavediver
02-01-2008 6:18 PM


Re: ... In the beginning
Hi cavediver,
cavediver writes:
Yes, 'common sense' would - but until you can actually define what you mean by 'something', 'from' and 'nothing'
Maybe here would be a good time for me to say what I mean about:
Something = everything you can see, feel, smell, touch and anything I left out.
God Bless,
Absence of Any thing = all the things in the definition of something.

"John 5:39 (KJS) Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 191 by cavediver, posted 02-01-2008 6:18 PM cavediver has not replied

ICANT
Member
Posts: 6769
From: SSC
Joined: 03-12-2007
Member Rating: 1.7


Message 202 of 405 (453277)
02-01-2008 6:59 PM
Reply to: Message 196 by molbiogirl
02-01-2008 6:43 PM


Re: Orgin (sic)
Hi molbiogirl,
molbiogirl writes:
You will note that he does not use the term. He simply references LaPlace and Einstein. And, at the very end, slips in a bit of a joke:
God still has a few tricks up his sleeve.
You do remember about 6 months ago you challenged me to get information from the source.
Yes I know what Hawking said about God, it was something to the effect we don't need him.
But I am partial to the one about tricks up His sleeve.
God Bless, I changed to this for tesla.

"John 5:39 (KJS) Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 196 by molbiogirl, posted 02-01-2008 6:43 PM molbiogirl has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 203 by molbiogirl, posted 02-01-2008 7:01 PM ICANT has not replied

ICANT
Member
Posts: 6769
From: SSC
Joined: 03-12-2007
Member Rating: 1.7


Message 208 of 405 (453291)
02-01-2008 7:13 PM
Reply to: Message 199 by Modulous
02-01-2008 6:55 PM


Re: Re-Orgin
Hi Mod,
Modulous writes:
That is the kind of thing that we are trying to explain to you
I know what he said about his unbounded theory including the imaginary time.
I think I said somewhere that sounds like Sci-fi. Seems he did also.
What does that have to do with what he said about the beginning of the universe.
He is trying to find a way to shore up the Big Bang Theory, just like all the other new theories that are floating around out there.
So why try to shore it up. Ditch it and get on to the job of coming up with another accepted theory including all information gleaned from the Big Bang Theory so we can debate it.
Hawking is talking about one, cavediver is talking about expanding the BBT, You are talking about replacing it. Son Goku says we need a new theory.
So what is the problem?
Oh I almost forgot the problem. I believe God created the heaven and the earth. Gen. 1:1.
God Bless,

"John 5:39 (KJS) Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 199 by Modulous, posted 02-01-2008 6:55 PM Modulous has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 216 by Modulous, posted 02-01-2008 7:44 PM ICANT has replied

ICANT
Member
Posts: 6769
From: SSC
Joined: 03-12-2007
Member Rating: 1.7


Message 210 of 405 (453293)
02-01-2008 7:19 PM
Reply to: Message 206 by molbiogirl
02-01-2008 7:06 PM


Re: ... In the beginning
Hi molbiogirl,
molbiogirl writes:
What is what? T=O? When time = zero.
Could you please give me your definition of "zero".
Is it anything like my "absence of anything?"
BTW I think tesla mispelled surely.
God Bless

"John 5:39 (KJS) Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 206 by molbiogirl, posted 02-01-2008 7:06 PM molbiogirl has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 212 by molbiogirl, posted 02-01-2008 7:27 PM ICANT has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024