Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
6 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,898 Year: 4,155/9,624 Month: 1,026/974 Week: 353/286 Day: 9/65 Hour: 0/3


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Before Big Bang God or Singularity
johnfolton 
Suspended Member (Idle past 5620 days)
Posts: 2024
Joined: 12-04-2005


Message 290 of 405 (453641)
02-03-2008 1:55 PM


Were the blackholes in the center of the galaxies believed created after the big bang or singularity?
Each galaxy are they not more of a flat spiral plane even our sun orbits in a flat plane around the center of our galaxy.
The universe including all the galaxies has been said proven to be a flat plane universe? including the diluting thru the expansion that makes space expanding appears to be related to the flatness of the universe?
I would of thought the expansion being faster than light would of rounded out the universe but interestingly
The expansion of the universe is not making it appear the universe is spherical in spite of space said to be expanding in all directions. It appears the expansion is primarily lateral and not longtitudinally, etc...?
P.S. Is this the believed premise that the universe is flat including all the known galaxies, etc...?
Edited by johnfolton, : No reason given.
Edited by johnfolton, : No reason given.
Edited by johnfolton, : No reason given.
Edited by johnfolton, : No reason given.

Replies to this message:
 Message 291 by tesla, posted 02-03-2008 4:33 PM johnfolton has not replied

johnfolton 
Suspended Member (Idle past 5620 days)
Posts: 2024
Joined: 12-04-2005


Message 298 of 405 (453987)
02-05-2008 1:48 AM
Reply to: Message 295 by Son Goku
02-04-2008 11:27 AM


Re: Big Bang.
13.7 billion years ago the whole universe was about the size of a pea. With the same amount of matter packed into it, hence it was very dense. It wasn't 5 billion light years wide until a while later.
If E=mc2 Your pea appears to be the reverse of a black hole where mass has broken down and all you have is energy.
Like energy trapped in time no mass until the expansion of time is this your singularity?
P.S. That pea too me is just a point in time from which the expansion of energy & time was being released by him, the Word, the Alpha and the Omega, etc...

This message is a reply to:
 Message 295 by Son Goku, posted 02-04-2008 11:27 AM Son Goku has not replied

johnfolton 
Suspended Member (Idle past 5620 days)
Posts: 2024
Joined: 12-04-2005


Message 323 of 405 (454736)
02-08-2008 2:01 PM


Father Time? God ???????
Time travel would seem impossible yet the bible talks of God knowing the end from the beginning saying that he is the alpha and the omega.
I'm leaning thats a bit why you could not see the pea at T=0 is due to time. If time curves back upon itself there could not be a singularity at T=0 due to the strings of time circling back because nothing had yet been expanded into our present universe until just after T=0.
Someone mentioned Hawkins? that time curves back to the the beginning thus believed to be circular? Our universe however appears to be flat so how is this possible not saying its impossible?
It just seems that God since the singularity has created a new beginning or at the very least expanded time into our present universe?
Since the expansion of nothing can exceed light speed then if time has burped out of the singularity does this make the universe like 6,000 years young possible? If time was released then the entire known universe could be quite young since the singularity? If the universe were actually quite old does the galaxies farther away support it spirals disipated or does the evidence support most galaxies still have spirals in spite of how close or far away the galaxies are from the earth? How does time factor into the spirals of the galaxies, etc...?
Think there is a whole lot of questions not that the bible supports the universe is 6,000 years but since time seems to be related seems its expansion might make the universe quite young, if since the singularity not just matter but time was playing a part in the expansion of the universe, etc...
P.S. Its almost like the entire universe was designed before T=0 like plant seeds and you get trees(galaxies) etc...?
Edited by johnfolton, : No reason given.
Edited by johnfolton, : No reason given.
Edited by johnfolton, : No reason given.

johnfolton 
Suspended Member (Idle past 5620 days)
Posts: 2024
Joined: 12-04-2005


Message 333 of 405 (454809)
02-08-2008 7:20 PM
Reply to: Message 331 by Rahvin
02-08-2008 6:33 PM


Re: Big Bang.
the energy required to accelerate further increases exponentially, and it would require infinite energy to actually accelerate any mass to the speed of light.
It does not appear to me either that the expansion of the universe is related to the acceleration of mass. I look at it more the creation of space so the energy could become mass, etc.... even today the expansion of the universe is said to be related to the space between galaxies spreading apart faster than the speedlimit of light yet no mass is said to be moving faster than light because that would of violated them theories of relativity.
Edited by johnfolton, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 331 by Rahvin, posted 02-08-2008 6:33 PM Rahvin has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 336 by Rahvin, posted 02-08-2008 7:42 PM johnfolton has replied

johnfolton 
Suspended Member (Idle past 5620 days)
Posts: 2024
Joined: 12-04-2005


Message 338 of 405 (454823)
02-08-2008 7:49 PM
Reply to: Message 336 by Rahvin
02-08-2008 7:42 PM


Re: Big Bang.
The rest of your post is in the "so off the mark it's not even wrong" category.
So do you believe mass moved faster than light in the big bang or that energy before it became mass could go faster than light. Not sure we disagree ?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 336 by Rahvin, posted 02-08-2008 7:42 PM Rahvin has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 342 by Rahvin, posted 02-08-2008 8:09 PM johnfolton has replied

johnfolton 
Suspended Member (Idle past 5620 days)
Posts: 2024
Joined: 12-04-2005


Message 344 of 405 (454846)
02-08-2008 8:32 PM
Reply to: Message 342 by Rahvin
02-08-2008 8:09 PM


Re: Big Bang.
As we understand physics, nothing can move faster than the speed of light in a vacuum.
If the space between galaxies is increasing faster than the speed of light then nothing can increase faster than the speed limit of light in a vacuum. Do you believe time is responsible for the increase of the entire universe spatial dimensions.
It just appears too me it was not a big bang because the universe is expanding it appears thru time not from an explosion of matter but more an explosion of space expanding thru time?
P.S. So do you believe all points before the singularity simply has been stretched. Is this what makes our universe able to have mass? E=mc2
Edited by johnfolton, : No reason given.
Edited by johnfolton, : No reason given.
Edited by johnfolton, : No reason given.
Edited by johnfolton, : No reason given.
Edited by johnfolton, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 342 by Rahvin, posted 02-08-2008 8:09 PM Rahvin has not replied

johnfolton 
Suspended Member (Idle past 5620 days)
Posts: 2024
Joined: 12-04-2005


Message 352 of 405 (454889)
02-09-2008 2:56 AM
Reply to: Message 347 by Rahvin
02-08-2008 10:58 PM


Re: Big Bang.
Something before T=O = universe expanding out of something.
There is no point in time where the universe does not exist. As T approaches 0, the universe was much smaller than it currently is. When T=0 and for a brief fraction of a second afterwards, conditions were such that our mathematical models of the laws of physics break down, and we call the breakdown a singularity. The singularity is neither an object nor a cause.
The bible agrees actually that the universe is expanding and that God alone is responsible. It kinda makes me wonder the point about where the laws of physics breaks down if all the elements were created at this point in time? It does not appear there ever was a big bang simply that time has expanded, etc....How else do you explain the expansion of the universe faster than lights speed but thru the expansion of spacetime?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 347 by Rahvin, posted 02-08-2008 10:58 PM Rahvin has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024