Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,895 Year: 4,152/9,624 Month: 1,023/974 Week: 350/286 Day: 6/65 Hour: 1/3


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   YHWH, Yahweh, Jehovah, adonai, lord, elohim, god, allah, Allah thread.
Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 246 of 298 (398238)
04-29-2007 10:55 PM
Reply to: Message 245 by One_Charred_Wing
04-29-2007 2:56 PM


Re: How is that okay?
The bottom line is which god is the true god, the NT violent Allah one or the NT nonviolent Jehohah one? Imo the fact that the Allah one bungled up what the Jehovah one did by applyting to all the world for all time what the Jehovah god applied only to one tiny land for one period of history indicates that it was the Allah one which counterfeited the real god's plan which was to usher in a period of salvation and grace until the time appointed for messiah Jesus to take over in Israel (now regathered as per prophecy) for the kingdom of god on earth long prophesied in both OT and NT.
Jehovah is the true god since his program is on tract as per the prophecies of both OT and NT. The Allah god has no record of fulfilled prophecy except that his followers were to kill, kill, kill until all competitive religions and nations are subdued under Islam. True Biblical Christianity grows by preaching the gospel alone minus all violence. Islam must use/threaten violence to grow and use/threaten more violence to keep Muslims from converting back out. Converting out of Islam is mandated death as per Mohammed and his desciples in the Koran, the Sunnahs and the Haddith.
If Jehovah be the true god, he will do what he will the the promised land and nobody will stop him. Thus Israel wins all their wars regardless of the odds and as per prophecy.
When Armageddon begins to ensue, Israel will be invaded and partly occupied again for a very short time but Jesus comes and saves the day for his messianic kingdom when this happens as I understand the prophecies.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 245 by One_Charred_Wing, posted 04-29-2007 2:56 PM One_Charred_Wing has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 247 by One_Charred_Wing, posted 04-29-2007 10:59 PM Buzsaw has not replied
 Message 248 by kuresu, posted 04-29-2007 11:02 PM Buzsaw has replied
 Message 249 by DrJones*, posted 04-29-2007 11:13 PM Buzsaw has not replied
 Message 254 by Modulous, posted 04-30-2007 8:27 AM Buzsaw has not replied

  
Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 250 of 298 (398244)
04-29-2007 11:17 PM
Reply to: Message 248 by kuresu
04-29-2007 11:02 PM


Re: How is that okay?
kuresu writes:
you know what would be interesting to see? A debate between Buz and a fundamentalist muslim. My bet--you two will say the exact same things, except in favor of your "chosen" god.
Well, my friend, the last real debate I had with a Muslim was on the old now defunct Newsmax forum. I was buzzboy then. The day before 9/11/01 the debate was going hot and heavy, me debating that Islam was a violent religion as per the Koran, Haddith and Sunnahs. The Muslim fellow along with the secularists were debating the Muslims line that it was peaceful. Well the evidence fell hard and sure the next day with the debate ended and me the winner hands down, not that I wanted that much evidence piled on us. The Muslim fellow never showed up again after the forum opened back up a few days later. He was likely out dancing in the streets along with the hords of other fundie Muslims around the world who were so happy those towers fell and those people died.
Edited by Buzsaw, : Add 01 to date

BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW

This message is a reply to:
 Message 248 by kuresu, posted 04-29-2007 11:02 PM kuresu has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 252 by kuresu, posted 04-29-2007 11:37 PM Buzsaw has not replied

  
Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 257 of 298 (420448)
09-07-2007 9:15 PM
Reply to: Message 248 by kuresu
04-29-2007 11:02 PM


Re: How is that okay?
kerusu writes:
you know what would be interesting to see? A debate between Buz and a fundamentalist muslim. My bet--you two will say the exact same things, except in favor of your "chosen" god.
The day before the AM of the 9/11 I was in fact member Buzboy (my username then) on Newsmax forum debating a Muslim fellow. I was debating that Islam was a violent religion and that Mohammed and his followers who wrote the Haddith and the Sunnahs advocated violence. He was claiming that it was peaceful and everyone was agreeing with him and joining in the debate, including the only moderator Wendya, me being the only one arguing my position. Of course the next day 19 devout Islam fundies in the USA from Saudi Arabia settled the argument. The Islam fellow disappeared off the radar never to return.

BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW.
The immeasurable present is forever consuming the eternal future and extending the infinite past.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 248 by kuresu, posted 04-29-2007 11:02 PM kuresu has not replied

  
Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 258 of 298 (420454)
09-07-2007 9:24 PM
Reply to: Message 255 by reletomp
09-07-2007 11:57 AM


Clarification Needed
Hi reletomp. Clarification is needed as to just what your points are. It would be appreciated if you would put it simple in a few statements. I'm not sure what your position is by what you were trying to get across.

BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW.
The immeasurable present is forever consuming the eternal future and extending the infinite past.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 255 by reletomp, posted 09-07-2007 11:57 AM reletomp has not replied

  
Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 259 of 298 (420458)
09-07-2007 10:15 PM
Reply to: Message 243 by Modulous
04-29-2007 4:59 AM


Modulous writes:
Adam is a prophet of Islam.
Noah is a prophet of Islam.
Moses is a prophet of Islam.
Abraham is. As is Ishmael, Isaac, Lot, Jacob, Joseph, Job, Aaron, Solomon etc etc.
Indeed - basically every prophet in the Old Testament is a prophet of Islam.
The problem with that is that none of the above are Biblical OT prophets perse. They were partiarcs, a priest, a king, a herdsman nomad wildman (Ishmael) and a father of all living (Adam).
Narry a one was one of the official Biblical prophets and not one of the real Biblical prophets are prophets of Islam. Why? Likely because they prophesied the return of Israel to the land in the end times and the demise of Edom and the other enemies of Israel, i.e, for the most part, descendents of Ishmael and Esau.
The Old Testament was big on expansion by violence. Indeed, the two philosophies are so similar many of Mohammed's contemporaries thought he was preaching the Old Testament!
I've said it many times and I see I need to repeat that The only expansion if you want to call it that was regarding the relatively little heathen idol worshipping land of Caanan which God gave his wandering people to eventually become the Messianic kingdom of Jehovah. They were never instructed to go beyond that. Thus, after the late 1967 war, lands outside of that area was not held by modern Israel when they could have done so.
On the other hand Mohammed and his followers have called for total world conquest for Allah their god of Mohammed and his book and of the Haddith and Sunnahs as per his successors.
They are both modifications of the god of Judaism. They are different modifications of it, but modifications nevertheless. That means they have different properties and characteristics. However, that does not mean the Jewish god is a different god to the Christian one and it does not mean that the Islamic God is different than the Jewish one.
You're bright on some things, Mod, but you've grossly deficient in your understanding of this subject. I've been in the Bible intensly for over 50 years. Believe me when I insist that Mohammed's god and Jesus's father/god are diametrically opposed. Thus you get killed for preaching Jehovah, Jesus and the Bible in Islamic nations like Saudi Arabia, Iran, Iraq, etc and if you convert to Islam and decide later you want out in such nations.
If you wish to concede the first, I'm happy to say that under those rules Allah is not the same deity as Yahweh. However, if you wish to keep Christianity as worshipping the god Yahweh, then under those same rules we have to also include Islam in Yahweh worshipping.
LOL! Tell it to any Islamic Imam or Islamic fundie government leader who will likely have you killed if you worship and propagate the god YHWH/pronounced Yahweh(Hebrew)/YHWH/pronounced Jehovah(English) in their mosque or nation. To be a Muslim convert YOU MUST confess that Allah (pronounced Allah English) is god and Mohammed (not Jesus)is his prophet. Then having done that YOU MUST not change your mind under the penalty of death as per fundamentalistic Muslim doctrine.
Islam is anti-christ/messiah and has been since it's inception. Thus it is anti-Biblical and not pro-Biblical. Bibles must be smuggled into most fundi theocratic Islamic nations.

BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW.
The immeasurable present is forever consuming the eternal future and extending the infinite past.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 243 by Modulous, posted 04-29-2007 4:59 AM Modulous has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 261 by Modulous, posted 09-08-2007 6:08 AM Buzsaw has not replied

  
Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 275 of 298 (457357)
02-22-2008 8:22 PM
Reply to: Message 269 by SAMBEE
02-21-2008 5:36 PM


Re: Jehovah The Biblical God's Proper Name In English
Sambee writes:
Surprisingly, the name of the Heavenly Father is not Jehovah, and never was. The history of "Jehovah," which some encyclopedias call erroneous and which many Bible scholars agree is not accurate, is quite eye-opening.
In the oldest text of the Bible, the ancient Hebrew script, the sacred Name is represented by four Hebrew letters, hwhy. These four letters are called the Tetragrammaton, appearing in English as YHWH.
The ancient Hebrew alphabet had no vowels. To indicate vowels, scribes or copyists used diacritical marks or points above or below the letters. Jewish law experts decided to hide this Name to make certain it would not be taken in vain or blasphemed. Therefore, when the four letters of the Tetragrammaton appeared in the text, scribes "pointed" it with substitution vowels for the Hebrew word adonai (meaning "lord")which was then read "adonai" instead of the sacred Name "Yahweh."
1. The Biblical translators all translate words and names from the language of the manuscript to another language.
2. The Hebrew names and words having no vowels would be translated adding vowels for the translation into any language calling for vowels. YHWH is just one example of this among the thousands Hebrew names and words.
3. To leave a proper name such as YHWH in it's Hebrew vowel-less form would render the translation incomplete and confusing.
4. Some letters of the alphabet such as J were later additions to the alphabet. This effected some changes in translations from ancient works.
Alphabet Additions

BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW.
The immeasurable present eternally extends the infinite past and infinitely consumes the eternal future.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 269 by SAMBEE, posted 02-21-2008 5:36 PM SAMBEE has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 276 by bluescat48, posted 02-22-2008 10:50 PM Buzsaw has replied

  
Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 277 of 298 (457486)
02-23-2008 6:40 PM
Reply to: Message 276 by bluescat48
02-22-2008 10:50 PM


Re: Jehovah The Biblical God's Proper Name In English
bluescat48 writes:
Much of the problem is due to the different pronuniations of translitterated letters. When YHWH became JHVH in German the pronounciation was Yahveh (Ia'-ve') J=consanental I, when brought to English JHVH beacame Jehovah (dzh-hou'-v) J=dzh.
If I understand you correctly this is much like Ian (Scottish-Gaelan)= John (Modern English). Biblical translators nearly all transliterated proper names into English equivalents along with everything else.
Imo all proper names including those of deities should be transliterated in the same manner. To do otherwise like the the Yahweh and Yeshuah advocates insist is devisive and confusing, especially for the novices.

BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW.
The immeasurable present eternally extends the infinite past and infinitely consumes the eternal future.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 276 by bluescat48, posted 02-22-2008 10:50 PM bluescat48 has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 278 by bluescat48, posted 02-23-2008 6:56 PM Buzsaw has not replied

  
Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 282 of 298 (459581)
03-08-2008 5:10 PM
Reply to: Message 281 by SAMBEE
03-06-2008 12:34 PM


Re: How the name Yahweh was lost.
Hi Sambee. I don't see that you've fully answered your own question.
Imo it was the Biblical scribes who translated scriptures in the latter centuries of Judaism. They developed this foolish superstition that it was taboo to write or speak the name so they simply took it upon themselves to substitute the word adonai (lord/master) in place of the proper name of YHWH/Yahweh/Jehovah. The majority of all translators up until the 1901 American Standard Version continued in this superstition. Thus the name was removed from the translated texts in direct violation with the prescribed restrictions on changing text under Judaic Law.
Now even the revisions of the ASV have reverted back to the removal of the sacred name from scripture. Thus the ignorance prevailing today relative to the fact that Allah of the Koran and Jehovah of the Bible are not one and the same god.

BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW.
The immeasurable present eternally extends the infinite past and infinitely consumes the eternal future.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 281 by SAMBEE, posted 03-06-2008 12:34 PM SAMBEE has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 283 by SAMBEE, posted 03-10-2008 9:15 AM Buzsaw has not replied

  
Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 289 of 298 (470177)
06-09-2008 7:58 PM
Reply to: Message 288 by sl33w
06-09-2008 5:26 PM


Re: God Is Teaching His Name Today
sl33w writes:
The bar will not re-connect with the beginning. This is complete BS and gibberish. Unless you think the Earth is a tiny speck on the surface of a spherical universe. But if you do think so, you need to see a doctor.
Hi. Welcome.
1. I suggest you read the thread and respond to some of my reasons why Jehovah is the proper English language rendition of the name you've cited which is the Hebrew pronunciation of the name. Most of us aren't Hebrews and we don't speak Hebrew. As with the rest of the scriptures which are translated using vowels we translate the name into understandable and speakable English.
2. As My arguments in this thread show, I take your position that in the Old Testament the name is used over 6000 times and should be translated as such rather than translating it into a completely different word, adoni, which is a generic word for lord/master.

BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW.
The immeasurable present eternally extends the infinite past and infinitely consumes the eternal future.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 288 by sl33w, posted 06-09-2008 5:26 PM sl33w has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 292 by PaulK, posted 06-10-2008 2:37 PM Buzsaw has not replied
 Message 294 by sl33w, posted 06-10-2008 5:04 PM Buzsaw has not replied

  
Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 291 of 298 (470234)
06-10-2008 6:40 AM
Reply to: Message 290 by Otto Tellick
06-10-2008 1:17 AM


Re: God Is Teaching His Name Today
Hi Otto. Thanks for weighing in with the interesting info. I'm wondering what your opinion is about my message 289.

BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW.
The immeasurable present eternally extends the infinite past and infinitely consumes the eternal future.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 290 by Otto Tellick, posted 06-10-2008 1:17 AM Otto Tellick has not replied

  
Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 295 of 298 (470377)
06-10-2008 9:35 PM
Reply to: Message 293 by sl33w
06-10-2008 4:51 PM


Re: God Is Teaching His Name Today
sl33w, "he is" or "the existing one" is what the name means. It is not the correct English translation of YHWH. Jehovah is the modern English correct translation of the name of HYWH. All proper names have meanings. That doesn't mean you communicate in and about them by what their names mean.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 293 by sl33w, posted 06-10-2008 4:51 PM sl33w has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 296 by sl33w, posted 06-11-2008 5:07 PM Buzsaw has replied

  
Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 297 of 298 (489267)
11-25-2008 7:05 PM
Reply to: Message 296 by sl33w
06-11-2008 5:07 PM


Re: God Is Teaching His Name Today
sl33W writes:
What it meant was a Greek form of "Joshua."
No. Jehovah means "the I am" or "the existing one."
Joshua means "Jehovah saves".

This message is a reply to:
 Message 296 by sl33w, posted 06-11-2008 5:07 PM sl33w has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024