It's been a few days, so I'll just assume that you've read my post and understood what I was saying. So, let's take the next baby step.
In the real world, we are surrounded by many phenomena, most of which we can't explain by common sense alone. What scientists do is they try to come up with a model that best fit the observed phenomenon.
Let's take a look at one of the more famous cases in history. For centuries, the geocentric model was embraced by the church because it conformed to the teachings of the church about man being the center of god's creation. But many astronomers over the years noted discrepencies in their observations that the geocentric model couldn't explain. Some scientists began to try to come up with a new model to better explain the observations. The heliocentric much much better explained what astronomers for centuries had been pulling their hair out over.
When Copernicus, Kepler, Galileo, and other like minds tried to present their evidence for the heliocentric model to their peers, they were met with criticisms. Like what true scientists ought to be, criticisms were welcomed, but only criticisms that made sense. Instead, they were met with nonsensical criticisms that could be easily debunked by anyone in any time period. And most of the criticisms came from people who had never spent a day studying astronomy.
I remember Kepler noting that someone criticised the heliocentric model because if the Earth moved then why weren't things being blown all over the place.
We now realize that the sun isn't in the center of the universe. It's not even in the center of the solar system.
I'm sorry for explaining the basics like this, but I feel that only baby steps will bring us anywhere with you.