|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total) |
| |
ChatGPT | |
Total: 916,914 Year: 4,171/9,624 Month: 1,042/974 Week: 1/368 Day: 1/11 Hour: 1/0 |
Summations Only | Thread ▼ Details |
|
Thread Info
|
|
|
Author | Topic: New theory about evolution between creationism and evolution. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
zi ko Member (Idle past 3650 days) Posts: 578 Joined: |
I think i am misunderstood. My theory does not preclude randomness in mutations.Neural system mostly gives general directions.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
zi ko Member (Idle past 3650 days) Posts: 578 Joined: |
Catholic Scientist writes: My only possible answer is: maybe all these spescies have their own communicating system. Or maybe you're wrong You ever consider that as a possible answer? ' Of I may be wrong. But we all have to try to find logical answers. Somebody may find abetter one later."
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
zi ko Member (Idle past 3650 days) Posts: 578 Joined: |
Bluejay writes: Hi, Zi Ko.
zi ko writes: Empathy! it is the key word to this remark. Mother antilopewill feel this need. Next offspring will have to be faster. Given this, we would predict that younger siblings will be fitter than their older siblings, because empathy will allow the mother to subconsciously improve her later offspring in relation to her earlier offspring. I'm quite certain that this prediction will fail. I am surprised! I mean hundreds or thousands generations later.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
zi ko Member (Idle past 3650 days) Posts: 578 Joined: |
Catholic Scientist writes:
Catholic Scientist writes: My only possible answer is: maybe all these spescies have their own communicating system.
Or maybe you're wrong You ever consider that as a possible answer? ' Of I may be wrong. But we all have to try to find logical answers. Somebody may find abetter one later." You posit that evolution employs some kind of communication between parent and offspring while totally failing to consider that the majority of species have no means of this communication. My answer was hypothetical. Would you like me to say that God's Will is the link between these spescies? Or there is no any communication at all and blind chance is the origin to their creation and evolution?The logical response to this is not "well maybe they do have the communications". The logical response is "oh yeah, it looks like I was wrong".
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
zi ko Member (Idle past 3650 days) Posts: 578 Joined: |
Bluejay writes: Hi, Zi Ko.
zi ko writes: Mother antilopewill feel this need. Next offspring will have to be faster.
Bluejay writes: Given this, we would predict that younger siblings will be fitter than their older siblings... I mean hundreds or thousands generations later. 我有一點困惑。 HoThe mother will feel the need for faster offspring, and this feeling will translate through the rest of her progeny until, hundreds or thousands of generations later, it makes the next offspring faster? What is your mechanism for the inheritance of these empathic states? w does what the mother feels upon seeing her offspring killed translate into evolution many generations later? "Mother's knowledge enhanced during next generations through experience and natural selection makes her neural system to give signals to DNA level structures to make apropriate preparations up to final change. Any random mutations which accelerate evolving through natural selection is used to the final goal"
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
zi ko Member (Idle past 3650 days) Posts: 578 Joined: |
Taq writes: Neural system mostly gives general directions. What are these general directions, how are they communicated, and what are they communicated to? " Offsprings to be fitter.Through neurons.To DNA.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
zi ko Member (Idle past 3650 days) Posts: 578 Joined: |
Evolution is result of interaction between organisms and enviroment.This means communication and knowing. Reaction presupposes knowing.
Collective subconscious it i rather a matter of belief.Anyway it fits with empathy.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
zi ko Member (Idle past 3650 days) Posts: 578 Joined: |
In general I agree.I should say I don't know. There is so much we don't know.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
zi ko Member (Idle past 3650 days) Posts: 578 Joined: |
In general i agree. i can't give clear answers.I should say just i don't know.From a point and then you have to choose between different beliefs.Our effort is to make our chosen one more logically accepted by ourselves.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
zi ko Member (Idle past 3650 days) Posts: 578 Joined: |
what is instict, if not unconscious accumulated knowledge which had led to reflective action?Octapus has not been always color blind, if it does matter at all,
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
zi ko Member (Idle past 3650 days) Posts: 578 Joined: |
You ask me me to explain the self evident.It couldn't be done otherwise.
I coluld name it hypothetical theory.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
zi ko Member (Idle past 3650 days) Posts: 578 Joined: |
It isn't amatter of believing or not to evolution.Evolution is accepted by me as a fact.It is about on which rules does it runs.My theory tries to expand natural explanation to the logical point, after which my stand will be a matter of belief.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
zi ko Member (Idle past 3650 days) Posts: 578 Joined: |
I can't answer about my mechanism. It is amatter of neuronal biology.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
zi ko Member (Idle past 3650 days) Posts: 578 Joined: |
Idon't exclude mutation or natural selection as evolutionary factors.Simply i add another one,which fits with some known facts (punctuated equilibrium and stasis by St GOULD and ELDREDGED, and collective unconscious by C YOUNG). Couldn't they work together?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
zi ko Member (Idle past 3650 days) Posts: 578 Joined: |
Coyote writes: Evolution is result of interaction between organisms and enviroment. Correct so far.
This means communication and knowing. Reaction presupposes knowing. Absolutely false. Evolution relies on selection pressure acting on populations. In any given population some individuals reproduce more successfully, and some less so. This, looked at over long spans of time or many generations, adequately accounts for all the effects you are trying to explain. It is false according to known theory. But with Neurogenic evolution it is true, without saying that i exclude natural selection and mutations. They can co exist and give better explanations to known facts.
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024