Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,907 Year: 4,164/9,624 Month: 1,035/974 Week: 362/286 Day: 5/13 Hour: 0/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   YHWH, Yahweh, Jehovah, adonai, lord, elohim, god, allah, Allah thread.
Amlodhi
Inactive Member


Message 46 of 298 (60137)
10-08-2003 3:43 PM
Reply to: Message 38 by Prozacman
10-08-2003 11:47 AM


Hi Prozacman,
quote:
Originally posted by Prozacman
Thankyou Amlodhi; I'll have to study what you've just written because I am obviously a freshman on this subject while you're apparently a senior!
I am fast approaching senior status, unfortunately however, it is not in the same sense of senior that you so kindly intended. But thank you anyway.
I have combined points #1 and #4 and will deal with them last.
quote:
Prozacman:
2. Why were ancient Jews(& even Jews nowadays)not allowed to say the name of YHWH? What's so incredibly cosmically important about the "name" of a god?
In case you overlook my previous answer to buzsaw, I will reproduce the thought here:
quote:
Originally posted by buzsaw
It was solely the unfounded superstition of the Jews who had departed from good standing with God that they enjoyed in the earlier history of the nation before this superstition existed, imo.
This is too uncharitable. It is quite likely that the Jews did not originally refrain from speaking the Name of God due to any superstition. They were, rather, so intensely concerned with not transgressing the Mosaic law that they would avoid even approaching the outer boundary of transgressing these laws; later sages would term this practice "building a fence around the law". Thus, in the sense of "playing it safe", they refrained from speaking the name lest they inadvertantly blaspheme or use the Name in vain.
quote:
Prozacman:
3. Thanks for setting me straight on "J&Y". During my life as a Gigantopithicus several thousand years ago, I read about the German translation of Y into J(somewhere),& then I forgot all about it. I'll have to find that reference.
Jah, mein Herr? Ein Gigantopithicus? Ach du Leiber!
quote:
Prozacman:
5. Can you elaborate on how, when, and why, for example, "Ishbaal became Ishbosheth?
The term "baal" simply meant "master" or "lord" and was one of the generic terms used as an honorific for the Hebrew God. Because the word became particularly associated with the Canaanite gods, the practice was discontinued and names containing the term were either altered (or later edited) to reflect the change.
Compare I Chr. 8:33 ". . . and Saul begat . . . Esh-baal."
with: II Sam. 2:10 "Ish-bosheth, Saul's son was forty years old when he began to reign over Israel . . ."
II Sam. is a polyglot of earlier and later sources so I'll leave it to you to work out the implications of the comparative dating. Good luck.
quote:
Prozacman:
1. I have heard that 'Elohim' contains a feminine aspect. Do you know anything about this?
4. I'm aware of the Canaanite name 'El' for God. Do you possibly know some history behind how 'El' ended up in the OT?
As I mentioned to buzsaw, this subject is extremely controversial and complex.
As to #1: Basically, "-im" is a masculine plural suffix. It has been contended that it is constructed from "Eloah". The "-ah" suffix usually (but not always) indicates feminine gender.
As to #4: As is the case with "baal", there are various contentions. One is that "El" was originally the Name of the God worshipped in the Semitic Middle East. Another is that "el" was a generic term for God which was later adapted as a proper name for a particular diety (i.e. El or sometimes Bull El) by some Semitic groups.
Add to this the further confusion that has been precipitated by the conjectured connection between El and Allah.
Though I don't read Arabic, some scholars say that Allah is constructed from "al" (the) - "Ilah" (god). Not only is there a similarity between "Ilah" and "Eloah" but also, an alternate spelling of "El" is "Il".
In addition:
quote:
(Excerpted in its entirety from cite link provided below):
"The root al, the root of the word Aleim, as a verb or it its verbal form, means to mediate, to interpose for protection, to perserve; and a noun, a mediator, an interposer. In its feminine its has two forms ale, and alue. In its plural masculine it makes alim, in is plural feminine aleim."
The similarity between "aleim" and "elohim" being obvious.
For further interesting information regarding these etymologies, I have included the following link from which the above excerpt was taken:
Plim Report Welcome
Namaste'
Amlodhi

This message is a reply to:
 Message 38 by Prozacman, posted 10-08-2003 11:47 AM Prozacman has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 48 by Buzsaw, posted 10-09-2003 12:30 AM Amlodhi has replied

  
Silent H
Member (Idle past 5849 days)
Posts: 7405
From: satellite of love
Joined: 12-11-2002


Message 47 of 298 (60150)
10-08-2003 4:38 PM
Reply to: Message 45 by Prozacman
10-08-2003 2:38 PM


prozacman writes:
doesn't Islam confine christians & Jews to the upper levels of Hell.
Don't Xtians believe Jews and Muslims are going to hell? Heck, even certain denominations of Xtians believe other denominations of Xtians are going to hell.
The most interesting thing, which happens to support my initial argument, is that it is the ones who believe you can "only be saved through Jesus" that usually make such extreme claims.
Hmmmmm. You mean believing and worshipping the one God, which is all that is required by the Old Testament, isn't enough to get one into heaven?
Now (according to these here Xtians) what one has to do is worship Jesus, who died for our sins (and here's a cross you can idolize him by). By eating his flesh (bread) and drinking his blood (wine), or through a watery baptism, one can be cleansed of sins (ie reborn) which allows one to enter heaven. Both options are versions of older Bacchus/Dionysus/ etc etc etc religious rites.
You do not see as much use of pagan rites in Islam. There is but one God. There are no intermediaries nor esoteric rites related to intermediaries.
------------------
holmes

This message is a reply to:
 Message 45 by Prozacman, posted 10-08-2003 2:38 PM Prozacman has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 51 by Prozacman, posted 10-09-2003 1:33 PM Silent H has replied

  
Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 48 of 298 (60211)
10-09-2003 12:30 AM
Reply to: Message 46 by Amlodhi
10-08-2003 3:43 PM


quote:
This is too uncharitable. It is quite likely that the Jews did not originally refrain from speaking the Name of God due to any superstition. They were, rather, so intensely concerned with not transgressing the Mosaic law that they would avoid even approaching the outer boundary of transgressing these laws; later sages would term this practice "building a fence around the law". Thus, in the sense of "playing it safe", they refrained from speaking the name lest they inadvertantly blaspheme or use the Name in vain.
I don't know how much Biblical history of Israel you know or whether you are aware of the warnings God gave about when they as his people disobeyed, but it was after their decline the last few centuries BC that this paranoia about the name of God came about as I understand it. Blasphemy occurs whether or not one uses the proper name of Jehovah or another discriptive name attributed to him, so it appears to be groundless superstition.
[This message has been edited by buzsaw, 10-09-2003]

This message is a reply to:
 Message 46 by Amlodhi, posted 10-08-2003 3:43 PM Amlodhi has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 49 by John, posted 10-09-2003 10:27 AM Buzsaw has replied
 Message 53 by Silent H, posted 10-09-2003 5:21 PM Buzsaw has replied
 Message 55 by Amlodhi, posted 10-09-2003 8:40 PM Buzsaw has replied
 Message 62 by Prozacman, posted 10-10-2003 11:45 AM Buzsaw has not replied

  
John
Inactive Member


Message 49 of 298 (60252)
10-09-2003 10:27 AM
Reply to: Message 48 by Buzsaw
10-09-2003 12:30 AM


quote:
...but it was after their decline the last few centuries that this paranoia about the name of God came about as I understand it.
Do you mean to say that the custom of not pronouncing YHVH arose only a couple of hundred years ago?
Looks to me like it has been the custom since about 300 BC.
Page not found - iahushua.com - ajaran bangsa israel dan yehuda / yahweh
------------------
No webpage found at provided URL: www.hells-handmaiden.com

This message is a reply to:
 Message 48 by Buzsaw, posted 10-09-2003 12:30 AM Buzsaw has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 56 by Buzsaw, posted 10-09-2003 10:41 PM John has not replied

  
John
Inactive Member


Message 50 of 298 (60254)
10-09-2003 10:30 AM
Reply to: Message 23 by Andya Primanda
10-07-2003 5:18 AM


quote:
Second, YHWH? I don't know Hebrew, but there is a common word 'Huwa' in Arabic which means 'he' [singular male third person].
Yahweh:
From Jesus Christ and the Temple, by Georges A. Barrios:
Moses had asked from God ... what was his proper name. The answer had been indirect, even elusive: "I am that I am", 'ehyeh 'ashr 'hyeh (Ex 3:14). In the third person, "I am" becomes "He is", Yahweh... "He is", Yahweh, would henceforth serve as a substitute for God's proper name, which remains unknown and unknowable...
No webpage found at provided URL: http://www.digiserve.com/mystic/Jewish/glossary.html#yhwh
------------------
No webpage found at provided URL: www.hells-handmaiden.com

This message is a reply to:
 Message 23 by Andya Primanda, posted 10-07-2003 5:18 AM Andya Primanda has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 57 by Buzsaw, posted 10-09-2003 11:31 PM John has not replied

  
Prozacman
Inactive Member


Message 51 of 298 (60283)
10-09-2003 1:33 PM
Reply to: Message 47 by Silent H
10-08-2003 4:38 PM


Give it some time, maybe 500 years, I dunno; the Moslems will probably have a whole bunch of idols. What about that rock in Mecca that everyone is required to journey to once in their lives??
That's correct, but it's mostly the conservative x-ians, from my experience, who believe muslims are headed for hell.
[This message has been edited by Prozacman, 10-09-2003]

This message is a reply to:
 Message 47 by Silent H, posted 10-08-2003 4:38 PM Silent H has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 52 by Silent H, posted 10-09-2003 5:20 PM Prozacman has replied

  
Silent H
Member (Idle past 5849 days)
Posts: 7405
From: satellite of love
Joined: 12-11-2002


Message 52 of 298 (60312)
10-09-2003 5:20 PM
Reply to: Message 51 by Prozacman
10-09-2003 1:33 PM


prozacman writes:
What about that rock in Mecca that everyone is required to journey to once in their lives??
A practioner can probably set the record straight on exactly what the Hajj involves, but from what I understand it has nothing to do with worshipping a rock.
From what I understand it is about making the same trip that M did. It's just kind of following in the footsteps kind of thing.
And if I'm not wrong isn't that rock where he threw stones to drive satan away?
I really doubt the tenets of Islam would allow for idolatry in any sense that Xtianity does. In fact fundamentalists are so out of their minds about that subject they blow up historical artifacts which might have had religious meaning.
They do not even allow images or sounds as representations of God.
About the only sucker they fall for is cults of personality. The idea of the Imam which shi'ites hold dear is very close to personality worship, ala worshipping Jesus. But even then I don't think shi'ites allow for an idol to stand in the place of the man.
------------------
holmes

This message is a reply to:
 Message 51 by Prozacman, posted 10-09-2003 1:33 PM Prozacman has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 54 by Pringlesguy7, posted 10-09-2003 7:03 PM Silent H has not replied
 Message 63 by Prozacman, posted 10-10-2003 12:13 PM Silent H has replied

  
Silent H
Member (Idle past 5849 days)
Posts: 7405
From: satellite of love
Joined: 12-11-2002


Message 53 of 298 (60313)
10-09-2003 5:21 PM
Reply to: Message 48 by Buzsaw
10-09-2003 12:30 AM


Hey buz, any comments on my posts?
------------------
holmes

This message is a reply to:
 Message 48 by Buzsaw, posted 10-09-2003 12:30 AM Buzsaw has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 60 by Buzsaw, posted 10-10-2003 12:12 AM Silent H has not replied

  
Pringlesguy7
Inactive Member


Message 54 of 298 (60336)
10-09-2003 7:03 PM
Reply to: Message 52 by Silent H
10-09-2003 5:20 PM


I thought the rock was where Mohammed ascended into heaven, somthing like he climbed a ladder? (im not sure) Mohammed had many wives, and I heard he had a 12 or 13 yr old wife?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 52 by Silent H, posted 10-09-2003 5:20 PM Silent H has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 59 by Buzsaw, posted 10-10-2003 12:04 AM Pringlesguy7 has not replied
 Message 66 by Prozacman, posted 10-10-2003 2:22 PM Pringlesguy7 has not replied

  
Amlodhi
Inactive Member


Message 55 of 298 (60349)
10-09-2003 8:40 PM
Reply to: Message 48 by Buzsaw
10-09-2003 12:30 AM


Paranoia?
quote:
Originally posted by buzsaw
I don't know how much Biblical history of Israel you know or whether you are aware of the warnings God gave about when they as his people disobeyed. . .
I've read a book or two. We can discuss it if you'd like, but I don't see it as being relevant to this issue.
quote:
buzsaw:
. . . paranoia . . . groundless superstition.
P.S. The prejudicial terms and adjectives that color your rhetoric reveal much about you.
Namaste'
Amlodhi
[This message has been edited by Amlodhi, 10-09-2003]

This message is a reply to:
 Message 48 by Buzsaw, posted 10-09-2003 12:30 AM Buzsaw has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 58 by Buzsaw, posted 10-09-2003 11:37 PM Amlodhi has replied

  
Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 56 of 298 (60353)
10-09-2003 10:41 PM
Reply to: Message 49 by John
10-09-2003 10:27 AM


quote:
Do you mean to say that the custom of not pronouncing YHVH arose only a couple of hundred years ago?
Looks to me like it has been the custom since about 300 BC.
I forgot to state BC and have edited the post to correct. Somewhere else where I mentioned it, I had it right, that it was BC. Thanks for bringing it to my attention.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 49 by John, posted 10-09-2003 10:27 AM John has not replied

  
Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 57 of 298 (60362)
10-09-2003 11:31 PM
Reply to: Message 50 by John
10-09-2003 10:30 AM


quote:
Yahweh:
From Jesus Christ and the Temple, by Georges A. Barrios:
Moses had asked from God ... what was his proper name. The answer had been indirect, even elusive: "I am that I am", 'ehyeh 'ash'eh (Ex 3:14). In the third person, "I am" becomes "He is", Yahweh... "He is", Yahweh, would henceforth serve as a substitute for God's proper name, which remains unknown and unknowable...
http://www.digiserve.com/mystic/Jewish/glossary.html#yhwh
This's nonsense for the following reasons:
1. The Biblical text does not use the third person, "he." It would be improper to change the name as given in scripture in referring to the name in the text as stated by God. This's simply a spin job for those who are trying to distort the truth about the name. It's fine to say "he is" in referring to him as existing, but that's not what he said his name was.
2. The fact is that God's name is clearly stated and is both known and knowable. YHWH is not the only Hebrew word with no vowels. None of the Hebrew words have vowels and as in speaking the name of God, YHWH, the phonics of the consonents would determine what vowel sounds which would apply. So "Yahweh" would be the traditional way to pronounce the name since just as in any other Hebrew word, that is the closest phonic sound of the consonents which spell the name. Then when you translate the name into English, you use the nearest English equivalent to Yahweh, which the translators have determined to be Jehovah, since the Js and Vs have been introduced into our language.
3. There's no reason in the world why the name is unknowable. The meaning is very clearly "the existing one" or as God told Moses, the "I AM." The Hebrew word/name YHWH became the known name of their god because it was the word/name which has the meaning "I AM" (the existing one.}
4. As I've said before and I repeat, until the Jews had moved away from their close relationship they once enjoyed with their god that they developed this reluctance from speaking his name. It was not always so. It was phonically no harder for them to speak that name than any other Hebrew word, all of which consisted of only consonents.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 50 by John, posted 10-09-2003 10:30 AM John has not replied

  
Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 58 of 298 (60364)
10-09-2003 11:37 PM
Reply to: Message 55 by Amlodhi
10-09-2003 8:40 PM


Re: Paranoia?
quote:
P.S. The prejudicial terms and adjectives that color your rhetoric reveal much about you.
Yah sure, and personal insultive inuendos add nothing to augment your arguments, nor do they refute my factual statements, do they?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 55 by Amlodhi, posted 10-09-2003 8:40 PM Amlodhi has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 61 by Amlodhi, posted 10-10-2003 12:36 AM Buzsaw has replied

  
Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 59 of 298 (60369)
10-10-2003 12:04 AM
Reply to: Message 54 by Pringlesguy7
10-09-2003 7:03 PM


quote:
I thought the rock was where Mohammed ascended into heaven, somthing like he climbed a ladder? (im not sure) Mohammed had many wives, and I heard he had a 12 or 13 yr old wife?
Mohammed is believed by Muslims to have ascended into the heaven from the Dome Of The Rock, Muslim temple on the Temple Mount at Jerusalem.
One of his ten or so wives, Aiesha, became his wife as a young girl and the marriage was consumated when she was nine years old. She became his favorite wife.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 54 by Pringlesguy7, posted 10-09-2003 7:03 PM Pringlesguy7 has not replied

  
Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 60 of 298 (60370)
10-10-2003 12:12 AM
Reply to: Message 53 by Silent H
10-09-2003 5:21 PM


quote:
Hey buz, any comments on my posts?
You're post is enough off topic, Holmes, that I'm sure admins would prefer they be addressed elsewhere. Likely they have been. All I can say is that you have all Christians in the same barrel there and some of the doctrines you've aluded to are not believed by all Christians as you have them stated there, such as the way communion works, and so forth.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 53 by Silent H, posted 10-09-2003 5:21 PM Silent H has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024