|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
Summations Only | Thread ▼ Details |
|
Thread Info
|
|
|
Author | Topic: Evidence for a recent flood | |||||||||||||||||||
IamJoseph Member (Idle past 3699 days) Posts: 2822 Joined: |
quote: Agreed. That is why this writings is mysterious. Its an anomaly on manifold levels, including that its the first alphabetical book [a multi-page continueing narrative], way ahead of its time even as of today. Genesis is astounding more so than if its scientifically correct [which it is!] - because it even thinks in the mode that it does: where have we seen a description of the universe as finite, containing unaccountable and inumerable stars, the introduction of the DAY, the seperation of water from land, followed by the first listing of life form categories in their correct order and subsequent to a seed which acts as a directive program chip as the factor for reproduction?
|
|||||||||||||||||||
IamJoseph Member (Idle past 3699 days) Posts: 2822 Joined: |
quote: Because it is not a reasonable demand, as is this one:
quote: Minutes and seconds were not yet in the human mindset. The writings are historically authentic, as also seen in the descriptions of the ancient Egytpian diets and lifestyle: you won't find tomatoes or camels in the text.
|
|||||||||||||||||||
IamJoseph Member (Idle past 3699 days) Posts: 2822 Joined: |
quote: Do you realise that makes the description even more accurate, because it seems to know there was not one lone mountain but a series?
|
|||||||||||||||||||
IamJoseph Member (Idle past 3699 days) Posts: 2822 Joined: |
Of note is the day beginning with night/darkness, aligns with the second verse, where darknessness is listed before the light appearing. This says one of either two things:
1. The darkness predates light and light was an action thereafter. Technically, this makes it correct a day begins with the eve [darkness], not the morning light. Or 2. Both the darkness and the light appeared simultainiously, namely both were seperated from the underlying voidless much, and both were equally seperated from each other ['And (why and?) He seperated the light from the darkness']. Off topic, but one can ask if the light in scenario [2] aligns with the big bang. Also, I don't see darkness as the absence of light: the attributes of these have no commonality and differ in kind than degree. I agree more with scenario 2.
|
|||||||||||||||||||
IamJoseph Member (Idle past 3699 days) Posts: 2822 Joined: |
You are exaggerating. I absolutely provided precise and irrefutable historical and geographical proof of the arc's landing location, in a manner which is not open to confusion. To the extent I was asked to provide longtitude and latitudes of an ancient event - in case you were absent from this forum at the time. My summary conclusion is all charges are negated except one called denial.
|
|||||||||||||||||||
IamJoseph Member (Idle past 3699 days) Posts: 2822 Joined: |
kNOCK-KNOCK!
This is what you should better attend to:
quote: Does Mr. Admin/Monitor Esq even understand I have three times provided 'MAP' pointers of Noah's location from the text itself, with no personal input or improvisation? Do you? Did you even read the part in my posts quoting verse references that Noah's arc landed in the Ararat mountains, and that the surrounding countires are Ninveh, Egypt, Canaan and Babylon. Would you like me to draw those countries in a map with longtitude and latitude to satisfy jokers and clowns - would it help? Then there's this beauty:
quote: Are the above map names NOT factual historical and geographical stats? Please enlighten since you decided to assist with your brilliant input. There's more:
quote: Not true. There is cross-nation independent reporting of this flood, which I already posted, with none responding to it.
quote: I already responded to this: this is listed by scholars as a bogus document, which date is post Hebrew, and asked the poster why he never saw this or even ask why we have no draduated imprints if this writing was 8,500 years old. Do the monitor have any response maybe? Shall I go on - or will you now enlighten us why you asked my not to post in that science thread because I claimed the universe is finite? Let me know if you care to have a bout with me in science knowledge too.
|
|||||||||||||||||||
IamJoseph Member (Idle past 3699 days) Posts: 2822 Joined: |
Here's what you should be responding to:
quote: I should apologise that a 3000 year text does not contain minutes and seconds.
|
|||||||||||||||||||
IamJoseph Member (Idle past 3699 days) Posts: 2822 Joined: |
quote: Pls show us, compared to which other writings is it maybe more accurate but less precise? How should it be shown to be more precise - you forgot to say?
|
|||||||||||||||||||
IamJoseph Member (Idle past 3699 days) Posts: 2822 Joined: |
The Christian take on the Hebrew bible is very genuine and sincere. But that does not mean it is also correct. The Hebrew text is very clear the earth is not 6000 years old, Isaac when offered for sacrifce was not a child but over 30 years old, and the flood is a regional one. Consider it when you wax poetic.
|
|||||||||||||||||||
IamJoseph Member (Idle past 3699 days) Posts: 2822 Joined: |
quote: Who says contemporary land marks introduced for the first time, with cross nation reporting are not evidence? Why not check how archeologists decide?
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024