Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,889 Year: 4,146/9,624 Month: 1,017/974 Week: 344/286 Day: 65/40 Hour: 1/5


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Israel/Lebanon/Gaza conflict (continuation thread)
Faith 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1472 days)
Posts: 35298
From: Nevada, USA
Joined: 10-06-2001


Message 136 of 300 (336474)
07-29-2006 8:22 PM
Reply to: Message 125 by jar
07-29-2006 7:09 PM


Re: On a Ceasefire
A humanitarian ceasefire was offered to allow time for the possibility of a diplomatic settlement.
Israel turned it down.
Facts are facts.
The actual FACT is only that a ceasefire CALLED "humanitarian" was offered and Israel turned it down. I'm sure as Buz is that they turned it down for excellent strategic reasons, knowing the duplicitous nature of it. But if enough world opinion like yours goes against Israel, they may be once again forced, as they have been time and time again, to give in to it, and as usual it will turn out to be an arrangement that is intended to put them at a disadvantage under cover of humanitarian claims. Just the usual disinformation game against Israel.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 125 by jar, posted 07-29-2006 7:09 PM jar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 139 by jar, posted 07-29-2006 8:29 PM Faith has replied

Faith 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1472 days)
Posts: 35298
From: Nevada, USA
Joined: 10-06-2001


Message 137 of 300 (336476)
07-29-2006 8:25 PM
Reply to: Message 129 by MangyTiger
07-29-2006 7:33 PM


Re: Evidence Hezbollah set up the UN post as a target
Please listen to the link I posted. I do not know the situation in Ireland well enough to comment, but what's going on in Lebanon is that a criminal organization is being treated as legitimate in a way that supports them against Israel.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 129 by MangyTiger, posted 07-29-2006 7:33 PM MangyTiger has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 149 by MangyTiger, posted 07-29-2006 9:24 PM Faith has replied

Faith 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1472 days)
Posts: 35298
From: Nevada, USA
Joined: 10-06-2001


Message 138 of 300 (336478)
07-29-2006 8:28 PM
Reply to: Message 130 by jar
07-29-2006 7:38 PM


Re: On a Ceasefire
The facts remain.
A ceasefire was offered to allow humanitarian aid and to provide the possibility of a diplomatic settlement.
Israel turned it down.
Thems the facts. All else is speculation.
No you misstate the facts again. The only fact is that a ceasefire that is only ALLEGEDLY for humanitarian aid etc has been offered.
Oh but there is another fact. Israel's turning it down is being spun by you and others as something reprehensible on their part purely on the basis of what is merely a call for an ALLEGED humanitarian ceasefire. You don't know the real reason for their turning it down but you don't mind insinuating that they are at fault.
Edited by Faith, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 130 by jar, posted 07-29-2006 7:38 PM jar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 140 by jar, posted 07-29-2006 8:30 PM Faith has not replied

jar
Member (Idle past 422 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 139 of 300 (336479)
07-29-2006 8:29 PM
Reply to: Message 136 by Faith
07-29-2006 8:22 PM


Re: On a Ceasefire
More simple assertion and speculation Faith.
Fact is:
A ceasefire was offered.
Israel turned it down.
Thems the facts. All else is just your assertion and speculation.

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

This message is a reply to:
 Message 136 by Faith, posted 07-29-2006 8:22 PM Faith has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 141 by Faith, posted 07-29-2006 8:32 PM jar has replied
 Message 142 by iano, posted 07-29-2006 8:39 PM jar has not replied

jar
Member (Idle past 422 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 140 of 300 (336480)
07-29-2006 8:30 PM
Reply to: Message 138 by Faith
07-29-2006 8:28 PM


Re: On a Ceasefire
See Message 139
Thems the facts Faith.

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

This message is a reply to:
 Message 138 by Faith, posted 07-29-2006 8:28 PM Faith has not replied

Faith 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1472 days)
Posts: 35298
From: Nevada, USA
Joined: 10-06-2001


Message 141 of 300 (336482)
07-29-2006 8:32 PM
Reply to: Message 139 by jar
07-29-2006 8:29 PM


Re: On a Ceasefire
Fact is:
A ceasefire was offered.
Israel turned it down.
Thems the facts. All else is just your assertion and speculation
Well SOMETHING I said must have hit home because I see you've dropped the "humanitarian" claim. Without it, yes, those are facts. A ceasefire was offered and Israel turned it down.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 139 by jar, posted 07-29-2006 8:29 PM jar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 143 by jar, posted 07-29-2006 8:40 PM Faith has not replied

iano
Member (Idle past 1969 days)
Posts: 6165
From: Co. Wicklow, Ireland.
Joined: 07-27-2005


Message 142 of 300 (336483)
07-29-2006 8:39 PM
Reply to: Message 139 by jar
07-29-2006 8:29 PM


Re: On a Ceasefire
And whats wrong with the fact that Israel turned down a ceasefire? That civilians are getting killed?
Let me guess: "Thems the facts and the world will make up its own mind"

This message is a reply to:
 Message 139 by jar, posted 07-29-2006 8:29 PM jar has not replied

jar
Member (Idle past 422 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 143 of 300 (336484)
07-29-2006 8:40 PM
Reply to: Message 141 by Faith
07-29-2006 8:32 PM


Re: On a Ceasefire
Nope, haven't dropped it Faith, just redundant. I get tired of typing the same stuff over and over to those who are without ears.
Facts are that a ceasefire for humanitarian reasons and to allow for a possible diplomatic resolution was offered and Israel turned it down.
Thems the facts Faith.
All the rest of the stuff you and Buz have posted is just assertion and speculation.

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

This message is a reply to:
 Message 141 by Faith, posted 07-29-2006 8:32 PM Faith has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 144 by iano, posted 07-29-2006 8:42 PM jar has replied

iano
Member (Idle past 1969 days)
Posts: 6165
From: Co. Wicklow, Ireland.
Joined: 07-27-2005


Message 144 of 300 (336485)
07-29-2006 8:42 PM
Reply to: Message 143 by jar
07-29-2006 8:40 PM


Re: On a Ceasefire
humanitarian / diplomatic resolution
No Jar. Thats something someone asserted was the reason. Are you saying now that because someone says something that it is a fact?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 143 by jar, posted 07-29-2006 8:40 PM jar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 145 by jar, posted 07-29-2006 8:47 PM iano has not replied
 Message 146 by Faith, posted 07-29-2006 9:00 PM iano has not replied

jar
Member (Idle past 422 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 145 of 300 (336488)
07-29-2006 8:47 PM
Reply to: Message 144 by iano
07-29-2006 8:42 PM


Re: On a Ceasefire
Read what the UN proposed. Thems the facts. All else is assertion.

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

This message is a reply to:
 Message 144 by iano, posted 07-29-2006 8:42 PM iano has not replied

Faith 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1472 days)
Posts: 35298
From: Nevada, USA
Joined: 10-06-2001


Message 146 of 300 (336494)
07-29-2006 9:00 PM
Reply to: Message 144 by iano
07-29-2006 8:42 PM


Re: On a Ceasefire
Are you saying now that because someone says something that it is a fact?
Yes, that's what he's saying. He'll assert it until it appears to be true just from the constant assertion of it too.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 144 by iano, posted 07-29-2006 8:42 PM iano has not replied

Omnivorous
Member
Posts: 3991
From: Adirondackia
Joined: 07-21-2005
Member Rating: 6.9


Message 147 of 300 (336496)
07-29-2006 9:14 PM
Reply to: Message 135 by iano
07-29-2006 8:11 PM


Re: On a Ceasefire
iano writes:
If civilians getting killed is a reason in itself to cease fire for humanitarian reasons then why have war at all where civilians can get killed?
Good point.
Should the US call a ceasefire in Iraq?
Too late for that. The U.S. should have refrained from considering massive civilian caualities acceptable "collateral damage." Liberators do not threaten your children with torture and rape, or bomb apartment buildings and kill dozens of women and children on the off chance that a few enemies might be there. We did that in Vietnam. Didn't work. It's hard to win the hearts and minds when you blow up the bodies.
Should the Allies have called a ceasefire before Dresden and Hiroshima?
Yes. Both the Dresden fire storm and Hiroshima were unnecessary bloody revenge.
It seems to me that the world is a little more complex than that Jar.
No, kill kill kill is really pretty simple. Hasn't worked yet.
And that is a fact too
What does Christ say about it, Ian?
How many times has Israel tried the Hammer of God Solution? Ms. Rice sees "the birth pangs of a new Middle East" among th cluster bombs strafing fleeing Lebanese civilians; Kissinger made similar remarks in 1982--the birthing then was of Hezbollah. What do you think is being born amidst the rubble now--surrender? Not bloody likely.

God gave us the earth. We have dominion over the plants, the animals, the trees. God said, ”Earth is yours. Take it. Rape it. It’s yours.’
--Ann Coulter, Fox-TV: Hannity & Colmes, 20 Jun 01
Save lives! Click here!
Join the World Community Grid with Team EvC!
---------------------------------------

This message is a reply to:
 Message 135 by iano, posted 07-29-2006 8:11 PM iano has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 148 by Faith, posted 07-29-2006 9:21 PM Omnivorous has replied
 Message 171 by iano, posted 07-30-2006 6:49 PM Omnivorous has not replied

Faith 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1472 days)
Posts: 35298
From: Nevada, USA
Joined: 10-06-2001


Message 148 of 300 (336498)
07-29-2006 9:21 PM
Reply to: Message 147 by Omnivorous
07-29-2006 9:14 PM


Re: On a Ceasefire
What does Christ say about it, Ian?
He didn't address nations or unbelievers except to tell them to believe.
How many times has Israel tried the Hammer of God Solution?
How many many many times has Israel given into pressure to give up land for "peace" even knowing that their enemy hasn't an honest bone in their body when it comes to promises of peace, and knowing that they are going to be put at a disadvantage in this process once again?
Ms. Rice sees "the birth pangs of a new Middle East" among th cluster bombs strafing fleeing Lebanese civilians; Kissinger made similar remarks in 1982--the birthing then was of Hezbollah. What do you think is being born amidst the rubble now--surrender? Not bloody likely.
If the world would stop restraining Israel, then their methods probably WOULD bring about a surrender. But with all the world holding the hands of the terrorists (who laugh behind their backs) and indignantly condemning Israel for its self-protective operations, they keep the situation at a boil. Shut up and stand back, let Israel defeat them soundly, and THEN you'll see them HAVE to come to a settlement, probably even a Palestinian state, and permanent protected borders for Israel for a change.
Edited by Faith, : No reason given.
Edited by Faith, : No reason given.
Edited by Faith, : No reason given.
Edited by Faith, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 147 by Omnivorous, posted 07-29-2006 9:14 PM Omnivorous has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 152 by Omnivorous, posted 07-29-2006 9:50 PM Faith has replied
 Message 153 by melatonin, posted 07-29-2006 10:16 PM Faith has replied

MangyTiger
Member (Idle past 6382 days)
Posts: 989
From: Leicester, UK
Joined: 07-30-2004


Message 149 of 300 (336500)
07-29-2006 9:24 PM
Reply to: Message 137 by Faith
07-29-2006 8:25 PM


Re: Evidence Hezbollah set up the UN post as a target
I listened to it as soon as you posted it.
An interesting but not altogether surprising piece of information, but insufficient by itself to convince me the hit on the UN post wasn't deliberate.
The most telling thing is - as far as I have heard to date - that the final destruction of the UN post and the death of the four unarmed observers was as a result of a laser guided bomb from an Israeli aircraft.
That's unlikely to be a mistake or an accident or collateral damage.
There was a piece on BBC News 24 last night where they showed pictures of the UN observation posts in that area along with an interview with a guy who'd been a UN observer there a few years back.
The posts are painted white, with the letters UN painted on them in 6 foot high letters and are sited as much as possible in clear areas (or the areas around them are cleared - not sure which) - they stick out like a sore thumb.
From CBC:
Annan has said Israel had given assurances to the UN that its positions would not be targeted by Israeli forces. In a briefing note to the UN, Jane Lute, assistant secretary general for peacekeeping operations, said the IDF had been repeatedly firing too close to the patrol base on Tuesday.
She said 21 strikes occurred within 300 metres of the base and 12 artillery rounds fell within 100 metres of it, with four hitting the base directly.
The strikes occurred despite the fact "Hezbollah firing was not taking place within the immediate vicinity of the patrol base," she said.
Four direct artillery hits on the base, no Hezbollah firing in the immediate vicinity at the time and then an airstrike to destroy the base.
It still doesn't sound like an accident or mistake to me.
I also don't hold out much hope of an investigation by the perpetrators throwing much light on what really happened.

Oops! Wrong Planet

This message is a reply to:
 Message 137 by Faith, posted 07-29-2006 8:25 PM Faith has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 150 by Faith, posted 07-29-2006 9:32 PM MangyTiger has not replied

Faith 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1472 days)
Posts: 35298
From: Nevada, USA
Joined: 10-06-2001


Message 150 of 300 (336505)
07-29-2006 9:32 PM
Reply to: Message 149 by MangyTiger
07-29-2006 9:24 PM


Re: Evidence Hezbollah set up the UN post as a target
Described as you say, no, it doesn't sound like an accident. But appearances are often deceiving and there is too much rush to judgment against Israel. It makes NO sense for Israel to attack a UN post intentionally, just none whatever, so I expect some blunder to explain it in the end. But yes, more facts are needed.
Edited by Faith, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 149 by MangyTiger, posted 07-29-2006 9:24 PM MangyTiger has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024