Unless the evidence opposing the theory does not exactly hit the headlines.
Well, since I don't limit myself to reading headlines, I tend to pick up a lot that others miss. For instance, I've noticed that many people here have asked you to provide evidence to support your contentions. I shall join the herd and ask you to provide evidence of all the discoveries that creos and cdesign proponentists have made over the years to support their positions.
That was in the days when they imagined that a simple cell is actually just some sort of blob -real simple -with that sort of information, one can imagine how the evolutionary hypothesis came to be accepted. With the current knowledge available to us, it is no longer such a simple possibility.
You completely missed my point. Before the ToE was accepted, most scientists believed in and worked under a creation paradigm. If what you are saying is true, there should be some evidence from that time to support it, since it's what all scientists were doing. Where's that evidence?
Those who would sacrifice an essential liberty for a temporary security will lose both, and deserve neither. -- Benjamin Franklin
We see monsters where science shows us windmills. -- Phat
™ Version 4.2
