Understanding through Discussion


Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 75 (8963 total)
215 online now:
Coragyps, jar, PaulK, Tangle, xongsmith (5 members, 210 visitors)
Newest Member: Samuel567
Post Volume: Total: 870,807 Year: 2,555/23,288 Month: 746/1,809 Week: 178/225 Day: 37/44 Hour: 2/7


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Trilobites, Mountains and Marine Deposits - Evidence of a flood?
AdminNosy
Administrator
Posts: 4754
From: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Joined: 11-11-2003


Message 47 of 518 (482318)
09-15-2008 8:21 PM
Reply to: Message 43 by Jason777
09-15-2008 3:53 PM


Advice for you Jason
Others have gone to considerable trouble to show you a tiny part of the evidence for an old earth.

It is now up to you to actually deal with that evidence. If you dance around and avoid it you will not be allowed to bring up any mention of a young earth again. If you want to suggest a young earth you have to deal with evidence presented to you that it is not.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 43 by Jason777, posted 09-15-2008 3:53 PM Jason777 has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 48 by Jason777, posted 09-17-2008 7:58 PM AdminNosy has responded

  
AdminNosy
Administrator
Posts: 4754
From: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Joined: 11-11-2003


Message 50 of 518 (482762)
09-17-2008 9:05 PM
Reply to: Message 48 by Jason777
09-17-2008 7:58 PM


Staying on Topic
Sorry about that.As i've told others earlier this is the Geology and the great flood forum and not the place to argue over old earth dating methods that thousands of people have refuted millions of times.

Thank you. The way it works here is if you have an important point you take it to an existing appropriate thread or you propose a new one.

Since dating is crucial to a lot of other things it is indeed important.

You might start by reading this thread:
Age Correlations and an Old Earth: Version 1 No 3 (formerly Part III)

If you think they are refuted then that is the thread you should show it in. Note, you have to answer all the correlations. You have to explain why so many independent lines of evidence agree so well.

If you can do that you will be the first. The first, not just here, but anywhere. The probable reason that YECers stay away from that thread is that there isn't anywhere on the web they can find answers. The problems for you raised there by RAZD are simply ignored by the YECy web sites.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 48 by Jason777, posted 09-17-2008 7:58 PM Jason777 has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 52 by Jason777, posted 09-18-2008 12:13 AM AdminNosy has not yet responded

  
AdminNosy
Administrator
Posts: 4754
From: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Joined: 11-11-2003


Message 144 of 518 (488884)
11-19-2008 12:58 AM
Reply to: Message 143 by Cold Foreign Object
11-18-2008 11:29 PM


Not an Answer, Ray
This is, obviously, not an intellectually honest attempt at debate Ray.

If you wish to post in the science threads you had better learn how to.

Last warning.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 143 by Cold Foreign Object, posted 11-18-2008 11:29 PM Cold Foreign Object has not yet responded

  
AdminNosy
Administrator
Posts: 4754
From: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Joined: 11-11-2003


Message 174 of 518 (490096)
12-02-2008 8:41 AM
Reply to: Message 172 by cavediver
12-02-2008 3:55 AM


Another Excellent Post, CaveDiver but ...
You could do with editing out the one unnecessary word. (Unnecessary in more than one way :) )

This message is a reply to:
 Message 172 by cavediver, posted 12-02-2008 3:55 AM cavediver has not yet responded

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.0 Beta
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2020