Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,901 Year: 4,158/9,624 Month: 1,029/974 Week: 356/286 Day: 12/65 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Relativity is wrong...
JonF
Member (Idle past 197 days)
Posts: 6174
Joined: 06-23-2003


Message 418 of 633 (520569)
08-22-2009 9:05 AM
Reply to: Message 410 by Smooth Operator
08-21-2009 10:09 PM


Re: Try Again....
Imagine a very heavy object. A block of steel. Now, if you need exactly 1,000 N of force to move it, and you only use 1 N of force, will you move the object? No, obviously not. All the other orbiting objects in the universe are exerting too little force on Earth to move it anywhere.
Wow.
Just.
Wow.
F=ma.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 410 by Smooth Operator, posted 08-21-2009 10:09 PM Smooth Operator has not replied

  
JonF
Member (Idle past 197 days)
Posts: 6174
Joined: 06-23-2003


Message 610 of 633 (535296)
11-14-2009 1:12 PM


I just can't stand not to mention that on another forum SO is claiming that all – that's all, each and every one, from the invention of photography onward – astronomical images are not images of the real world but instead are "either drawn by hand, or by a computer".
404 Not Found
Talk about needing a clue!

Replies to this message:
 Message 611 by Smooth Operator, posted 11-14-2009 1:42 PM JonF has replied

  
JonF
Member (Idle past 197 days)
Posts: 6174
Joined: 06-23-2003


Message 613 of 633 (535308)
11-14-2009 4:39 PM
Reply to: Message 611 by Smooth Operator
11-14-2009 1:42 PM


And I just can't stand when people lie. I never said every single picutre is computer generated. But MOST of them are.
Follow the link and see what he said and what he said it about.
404 Not Found

This message is a reply to:
 Message 611 by Smooth Operator, posted 11-14-2009 1:42 PM Smooth Operator has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 616 by Smooth Operator, posted 11-15-2009 8:05 AM JonF has not replied

  
JonF
Member (Idle past 197 days)
Posts: 6174
Joined: 06-23-2003


Message 619 of 633 (535372)
11-15-2009 8:47 AM
Reply to: Message 618 by Iblis
11-15-2009 8:29 AM


Re: not English
You can create classes to hold the information about them and keep it from interfering with the information about the background that you want to render them on top of, even though that is an artificial distinction in terms of the pictures you begin with, which are undifferentiated bitmaps.
The mkobjects routine to which he refers does indeed add apparently physical objects which do not exist, and is used to calibrate analysis routines. The Calibration of the Hubble Space Telescope Kuiper Belt Object Search: Setting the Record Straight.
SO seems to "think", if such a word can be applied to what goes on inside his head, that:
1. A routine to add objects to images exists.
2. That routine was used to add some objects to some images to calibrate the analysis routines.
3. Therefore, all objects in all astronomical images, electronically processed or not, are faked.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 618 by Iblis, posted 11-15-2009 8:29 AM Iblis has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 623 by Smooth Operator, posted 11-18-2009 5:39 AM JonF has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024