Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 59 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,929 Year: 4,186/9,624 Month: 1,057/974 Week: 16/368 Day: 16/11 Hour: 0/4


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   For percy: setting the record straight on Charlie Rose interview
AdminBuzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 101 of 231 (287177)
02-15-2006 11:09 PM
Reply to: Message 98 by AdminAsgara
02-15-2006 8:04 PM


Seconded!
Asgara writes:
Folks, quit the opponant bashing.
I second that motion put forth to the floor.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 98 by AdminAsgara, posted 02-15-2006 8:04 PM AdminAsgara has not replied

  
AdminBuzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 133 of 231 (287466)
02-16-2006 8:24 PM
Reply to: Message 107 by randman
02-16-2006 10:51 AM


Randman writes:
I think they know what they are doing. They are typically overstating the case, as evos do.
Hi Rand. I'm not sure who's winning this debate. Though I've scan-read the thread, I'm not enough read up on the subject to make a judgement. I do think that regardless of who's winning, it's been a good and civil debate. I see you commented on the above statement down the thread a ways inferring that most do, but I would caution you on lumping all evos as you have above. This tees off every evo here at EvC, no doubt. Even if one thinks most of any given group causes offenses, for the benefit of those who don't, it's best to say something like "as some evos do," et al.
Having said the above, I'll be watching for evos who may be lumping creos in a similar manner. If we all keep working on our PR here things will hum along nicely for the good of all. Thanks for working on yours. Overall, I think you're doing good.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 107 by randman, posted 02-16-2006 10:51 AM randman has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 139 by randman, posted 02-17-2006 12:48 AM AdminBuzsaw has not replied

  
AdminBuzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 176 of 231 (288253)
02-18-2006 10:08 PM
Reply to: Message 172 by Percy
02-18-2006 7:52 PM


Re: I've just watched it.
Percy writes:
Of course, this is just the kind of hogwash you expect from Christians. They're always exaggerating and making overblown statements and engaging in logical fallacies. Their positions don't make any sense. They are misusing Christianity and typically overstating the case. Why don't they just admit what they're doing instead of weaseling out and attacking those that are telling the truth about what Christians are really doing? This is just dishonest and deceptive.
I assured Randman after admonishing him about lumping all evos into one in his posts, that I'd be watching for evos who did this so (gulp) Percy, sir, me friend, with all due respect for your position, what's good for the goose's gotta be good for the gander.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 172 by Percy, posted 02-18-2006 7:52 PM Percy has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 178 by Belfry, posted 02-18-2006 10:50 PM AdminBuzsaw has not replied

  
AdminBuzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 182 of 231 (288272)
02-18-2006 11:41 PM


Well, They Warned Me There'd Be Mistakes.
I see GDR and I both needed to read more carefully, especially me, the mod, and it had to be Percy, so I did it up good. Well anyhow, Rand can see that I kept my word on fairness and balance. (Gulp) Percy, sir, me friend, my apologies for the goofup!

  
AdminBuzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 206 of 231 (288573)
02-20-2006 8:54 AM
Reply to: Message 203 by SuperNintendo Chalmers
02-20-2006 2:19 AM


Re: Where's the Beef?
SuperNC writes:
Honestly, I think your main problem is that you focus on the motivations of "evo scientists" like they are some monolithic group.
SuperNC, to be fair and since Rand has shown improvement in this area since being admonished about it, Rand did not say "evo scientists," which would be indicitative of monolithically grouping them all. He did prefix the phrase with the word "many."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 203 by SuperNintendo Chalmers, posted 02-20-2006 2:19 AM SuperNintendo Chalmers has not replied

  
AdminBuzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 218 of 231 (288843)
02-20-2006 6:59 PM
Reply to: Message 208 by randman
02-20-2006 11:02 AM


Re: Where's the Beef?
Randman writes:
Percy did not and basically called me a liar for saying they did the first time this came around.
Rand, did I miss something here? Unless Percy outright accused you of lying, given the intensity of the debate, it's best to allow for what he said to mean your information was false or that you were mistaken, especially when you can give him the benefit of the doubt. You're obviously frustrated, but this's not important enough a matter to get all uptight over. Do your best to relax and choose the nonconfrontal manner of responding as best you can. You're obviously irritating Percy in some areas and my suggestion is that you let go of some things which you'll never agree on, especially the less important aspects of the debate.
The debate seems to be getting bogged down with this "he,they said/he,they didn't say" rut. Slow down, if need be and try to get'er hummin along in a more conciliatory manner.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 208 by randman, posted 02-20-2006 11:02 AM randman has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024