Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,879 Year: 4,136/9,624 Month: 1,007/974 Week: 334/286 Day: 55/40 Hour: 0/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Christianity, Knowledge and Science
Rob 
Suspended Member (Idle past 5877 days)
Posts: 2297
Joined: 06-01-2006


Message 47 of 221 (376037)
01-10-2007 8:47 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by Cocytus
01-07-2007 6:12 PM


Cocytus asks:
This arguement thus asks the question: "Does religion make good people do bad things?" In this case "bad things" refers to standing in the way of progress.
My simple answer to your question is yes!
The long answer is a little more evocative... let's think about it!
Our religion is really just our philosophy. It is our 'worldview' that we use to tell us what is legitimate and what is not. It also tells us what is progress and what is not. And our philosophies' foundation is where the critical assumptions hide. If we want to know if our 'religion' is reasonable, we have to find out if the assumptions that anchor that 'worldview' are logical.
Cocytus said:
Christianity has, within it's very first book Genesis, stigmatized knowledge itself as something terrible.
NO it doesn't. It stigmatizes knowledge of evil as terrible. And that is precisely why Judeo-Christian assumptions are correct.
There is so much we do not know...
For example, I don't think anyone had the kind of knowledge that Josef Mengala tried to shed light on, as he castrated and experimented on young boys in Germany.
Just think of all the things we don't know. There is so much hell yet to be unleashed.
So back to my simple answer... yes! Religion does make good people do bad things. And it started in the garden of Eden when man tried to play God. But the worldview of a Hitler or Mengala is certainly about the worse we've yet seen. But a different philosophy can lead us even more astray. Like one that says all knowledge is good and progresive.
So we run into a fix... Some knowledge is evil.
Let's look at the first religion that challenged the absolute:
Genesis 3:1 Now the serpent was more crafty than any of the wild animals the Lord God had made. He said to the woman, "Did God really say, 'You must not eat from any tree in the garden'?" 2 The woman said to the serpent, "We may eat fruit from the trees in the garden, 3 but God did say, 'You must not eat fruit from the tree that is in the middle of the garden, and you must not touch it, or you will die.'" 4 "You will not surely die," the serpent said to the woman. 5 "For God knows that when you eat of it your eyes will be opened, and you will be like God, knowing good and evil."
We've still infinite room to use science (knowledge) to unleash all manner of Pandora's boxes. Science is amoral (as opposed to immoral) so as King Crimson (I think) sang in the sixties, 'knowledge is a deadly friend when no-one sets the rules, the fate of all mankind I see is in the hands of fools.'
Edited by scottness, : No reason given.
Edited by scottness, : No reason given.
Edited by scottness, : No reason given.

Mark 8:33 But when Jesus turned and looked at his disciples, he rebuked Peter. "Get behind me, Satan!" he said. "You do not have in mind the things of God, but the things of men."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by Cocytus, posted 01-07-2007 6:12 PM Cocytus has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 48 by ringo, posted 01-10-2007 9:08 PM Rob has replied
 Message 68 by sidelined, posted 01-11-2007 8:21 AM Rob has not replied

  
Rob 
Suspended Member (Idle past 5877 days)
Posts: 2297
Joined: 06-01-2006


Message 49 of 221 (376046)
01-10-2007 9:19 PM
Reply to: Message 48 by ringo
01-10-2007 9:08 PM


Gen 3:22 And the LORD God said: 'Behold, the man is become as one of us, to know good and evil; and now, lest he put forth his hand, and take also of the tree of life, and eat, and live for ever.'
You're predictable as sunrise.
I'm glad you brought up that most excellent and glorious point!
Knowledge is not stigmatized. It makes us more like God.
Who get's to choose how much like God we are supposed to be? What is humanity's perfection?
I mean, God created rocks to reflect His glory as well. Does a rock question why God made it a rock? And will it instead insist on being a boulder? How can a mountain exist without the rocks?
Everything has a proper place. Do we know our place? Or has our programming been altered because we will... what we know not?
Isaiah 29:16 You turn things upside down, as if the potter were thought to be like the clay! Shall what is formed say to him who formed it, "He did not make me"? Can the pot say of the potter, "He knows nothing"?
Isaiah 45:9 "Woe to him who quarrels with his Maker, to him who is but a potsherd among the potsherds on the ground. Does the clay say to the potter, 'What are you making?' Does your work say, 'He has no hands'?
How well can you handle what knowledge you have Ringo?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 48 by ringo, posted 01-10-2007 9:08 PM ringo has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 50 by ringo, posted 01-10-2007 9:28 PM Rob has replied

  
Rob 
Suspended Member (Idle past 5877 days)
Posts: 2297
Joined: 06-01-2006


Message 51 of 221 (376051)
01-10-2007 10:03 PM
Reply to: Message 50 by ringo
01-10-2007 9:28 PM


The topic is about knowledge and I was pointing out that knowledge is not stigmatized in the first part of Genesis. Far from it. Knowledge makes us "more like God".
That's a good thing. That's all. No need to measure it.
What ever Ringo... God has many qualities. If you think gaining one of those qualites (knowledge) without gaining the complimentary discipline (morality) that balances that power is good, then you're just so hell bent on gaining or holding onto whatever it is you worship, that you have become blind.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 50 by ringo, posted 01-10-2007 9:28 PM ringo has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 52 by ringo, posted 01-10-2007 10:13 PM Rob has replied

  
Rob 
Suspended Member (Idle past 5877 days)
Posts: 2297
Joined: 06-01-2006


Message 53 of 221 (376057)
01-10-2007 10:41 PM
Reply to: Message 52 by ringo
01-10-2007 10:13 PM


There is no question of "balance" or "power". It's about knowledge - and knowing what is good or evil in a specific situation is the hard part.
Okay, I'll accept that!
Do you have all knowledge, such as knowledge of the consequences of actions new to you?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 52 by ringo, posted 01-10-2007 10:13 PM ringo has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 54 by ringo, posted 01-10-2007 10:48 PM Rob has replied

  
Rob 
Suspended Member (Idle past 5877 days)
Posts: 2297
Joined: 06-01-2006


Message 55 of 221 (376062)
01-10-2007 10:50 PM
Reply to: Message 54 by ringo
01-10-2007 10:48 PM


Please answer the question. Do you have all knowledge? It's a simple yes or no.
I have the responsibility to act on the knowledge that I do have.
So be responsible...
We all know the answer... So do tell!
Edited by scottness, : No reason given.
Edited by scottness, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 54 by ringo, posted 01-10-2007 10:48 PM ringo has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 56 by jar, posted 01-10-2007 10:57 PM Rob has replied

  
Rob 
Suspended Member (Idle past 5877 days)
Posts: 2297
Joined: 06-01-2006


Message 57 of 221 (376069)
01-10-2007 11:00 PM
Reply to: Message 56 by jar
01-10-2007 10:57 PM


Re: All Knowledge?
We have all the knowledge we have when we make decisions, and that is all we will ever have.
So, based on the knowledge you have, please make a decision to tell us if you have all knowledge please.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 56 by jar, posted 01-10-2007 10:57 PM jar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 59 by jar, posted 01-10-2007 11:06 PM Rob has replied

  
Rob 
Suspended Member (Idle past 5877 days)
Posts: 2297
Joined: 06-01-2006


Message 60 of 221 (376081)
01-10-2007 11:20 PM
Reply to: Message 59 by jar
01-10-2007 11:06 PM


Re: All Knowledge?
I have all the knowledge I have, as I said.
Is the knowledge you have equal to all the knowledge that there is? Are you omniscient?
That is as simple a question as there can be!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 59 by jar, posted 01-10-2007 11:06 PM jar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 62 by jar, posted 01-10-2007 11:24 PM Rob has replied

  
Rob 
Suspended Member (Idle past 5877 days)
Posts: 2297
Joined: 06-01-2006


Message 63 of 221 (376088)
01-10-2007 11:26 PM
Reply to: Message 62 by jar
01-10-2007 11:24 PM


Re: End of silly game playing
Play your silly games with someone else.
The only game... is you... not answering... a question... that everyone knows the answer to already.

Mark 8:33 But when Jesus turned and looked at his disciples, he rebuked Peter. "Get behind me, Satan!" he said. "You do not have in mind the things of God, but the things of men."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 62 by jar, posted 01-10-2007 11:24 PM jar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 65 by jar, posted 01-10-2007 11:33 PM Rob has replied

  
Rob 
Suspended Member (Idle past 5877 days)
Posts: 2297
Joined: 06-01-2006


Message 67 of 221 (376113)
01-11-2007 1:38 AM
Reply to: Message 65 by jar
01-10-2007 11:33 PM


Re: End of silly game playing
jar said:
Of course I do not have all knowledge.
The reason this started is because Ringo made a comment in relation to knowledge:
There is no question of "balance" or "power". It's about knowledge - and knowing what is good or evil in a specific situation is the hard part.
And cooperatively,,, I said to Ringo:
Okay, I'll accept that!
So do you have all knowledge, such as knowledge of the consequences of actions new to you?
Then, after he chased his tail a bit, you stepped in.
jar said:
Your question is silly, sophomoric and inane. Of course I do not have all knowledge.
The question is not inane. The most important questions are the simplest ones. And they are the one's least asked of ourselves in our selfrighteous priggery. Allow me to demonstrate... Allow me to serve...
And thank you for cooperating! Now I can move on with my premise...
jar said:
I do have the knowledge I have at any given moment to make decisions. That is all that I have.
And I think the most pertinent knowledge in that catagory is the fact that you do not have all knowledge.
And none of us do by the way. If anyone is an exception, you may wish to skip the rest of this...
And that is why, what I asked Ringo is so critical...:
So do you have all knowledge, such as knowledge of the consequences of actions new to you?
Not the best framed question mind you, but everyone get's the point, 'do we know the consequences of actions?'
I am moving very slowly for a reason. Not to offend, but so there is no wiggle room for our malignant duplicity (all our names are Jacob).
If we do not have knowledge of the consequences of our actions, and we know that we do not... then how can we possibly know whether or not we are going the right way?
You actually pegged it jar! You nailed it right on the head when you reminded Anastasia that we were kicked out of the GoE so that we would not be allowed to eat from the tree of life.
Only He knows everything, and only He knows the way. If He allowed us to live at our own whim forever then nothing would stop a Hitler or a Ghengis Khan. And given eternity in this place, don't think that you and I would have been any better. We cannot even imagine what chaos is. As miserable as it is in this place, we have it good!
Again, jar said:
I do have the knowledge I have at any given moment to make decisions. That is all that I have.
That is incorrect. You have another choice that avails itself beyond the mere cause and effect of your current knowledge. Your choices are not as black and white as you pretend to believe.
You cannot deny that as a fintite creature you're lost in an eternal existence without the supplies to build your Tower. But you try as we all did, but then comes the Word.
As C.S. Lewis said, '...cool intellect must not only prevail against cool intellect on the other side, but against the muddy heathen mysticisms that deny intellect altogether.'
There is a 'triune' option. And that option is to surrender our whole life to God. To admit that we have been hiding from Him, and finally give up our wealth of passions and beliefs; to give up our religions, and our ignorance; to acknowledge our bankruptcy and dishonesty; our utter inability to hide or pretend that God doesn't know exactly what we are. And to see ourselves for the first time, in desparate need of forgiveness, and with no option but to trust Him.
No beliefs; no interpretaions... Just total surrender. If for no other reason that it is the only logical option with nothing left to lose..
2 Kings 7:3 Now there were four men with leprosy at the entrance of the city gate. They said to each other, "Why stay here until we die? 4 If we say, 'We'll go into the city'--the famine is there, and we will die. And if we stay here, we will die. So let's go over to the camp of the Arameans and surrender. If they spare us, we live; if they kill us, then we die."
That is Christianity. And that is knowledge.
God will lead us into all knowledge, but only He forsees the pitfalls. He leads us in ways we could have never guessed. Saves us from traps we never perceived. If we do not trust Him, we will die.
Isaiah 40:14 Whom did the Lord consult to enlighten him, and who taught him the right way? Who was it that taught him knowledge or showed him the path of understanding?
Isaiah 43:19 See, I am doing a new thing! Now it springs up; do you not perceive it? I am making a way in the desert and streams in the wasteland.
Isaiah 48:17 This is what the Lord says-- your Redeemer, the Holy One of Israel: "I am the Lord your God, who teaches you what is best for you, who directs you in the way you should go.
John 14:6 Jesus answered, "I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me.
Edited by scottness, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 65 by jar, posted 01-10-2007 11:33 PM jar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 69 by Woodsy, posted 01-11-2007 8:55 AM Rob has not replied
 Message 70 by jar, posted 01-11-2007 10:00 AM Rob has replied
 Message 83 by Archer Opteryx, posted 01-11-2007 2:58 PM Rob has not replied
 Message 84 by iceage, posted 01-11-2007 3:12 PM Rob has replied

  
Rob 
Suspended Member (Idle past 5877 days)
Posts: 2297
Joined: 06-01-2006


Message 92 of 221 (376329)
01-11-2007 8:11 PM
Reply to: Message 84 by iceage
01-11-2007 3:12 PM


Re: End of silly game playing
Knowledge is finding the cure of leprosy!
And then you still die...
The only total cure to our ills is the resurection.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 84 by iceage, posted 01-11-2007 3:12 PM iceage has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 98 by iceage, posted 01-11-2007 11:51 PM Rob has replied
 Message 99 by AdminSchraf, posted 01-12-2007 12:04 AM Rob has not replied

  
Rob 
Suspended Member (Idle past 5877 days)
Posts: 2297
Joined: 06-01-2006


Message 93 of 221 (376331)
01-11-2007 8:15 PM
Reply to: Message 70 by jar
01-11-2007 10:00 AM


Re: End of silly game playing
I'm sorry Rob but everything after "And I think the most pertinent knowledge in that catagory is the fact that you do not have all knowledge." was just jabberwocky.
Well first of all, your not sorry about anything.
Secondly, everything I said is not jabberwocky, unless you believe in absolutes...
You think it is jabberwocky. And that is a different thing.
You already admitted you do not know everything. I know it was hard...

This message is a reply to:
 Message 70 by jar, posted 01-11-2007 10:00 AM jar has not replied

  
Rob 
Suspended Member (Idle past 5877 days)
Posts: 2297
Joined: 06-01-2006


Message 94 of 221 (376345)
01-11-2007 9:28 PM
Reply to: Message 72 by NosyNed
01-11-2007 10:28 AM


Re: knowledge and scotness' point
I think that scottness has a good point in there.
What he is saying isn't in the Bible (big surprise ) but I think he has a point.
Knowledge is power. Giving ourselves too much power that we don't have the understanding and wisdom to use well is dangerous.
Thanks Nosy, I appriciate the meeting in the middle, and your not throwing the baby out with the rest of the cliche...
But it is in the Bible... that is what the whole Bible is about! It is about power. Knowledge and power.
And the cross challenges everything we believe about power.
It challenges our right to power.
It challenges our right to use that power.
Jesus showed us how to use it properly... not for our indulgence, but for the sake of others.
Look at it this way... if you had the power that Jesus had (assuming He had all power at his diposal)... what would Nosy do with it?
I asked myself those questions long ago... and the answers stunned me.

John 14:18 I will not leave you as orphans; I will come to you.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 72 by NosyNed, posted 01-11-2007 10:28 AM NosyNed has not replied

  
Rob 
Suspended Member (Idle past 5877 days)
Posts: 2297
Joined: 06-01-2006


Message 95 of 221 (376348)
01-11-2007 9:40 PM
Reply to: Message 72 by NosyNed
01-11-2007 10:28 AM


Re: knowledge and scotness' point
We alleviate suffering with our abilities to cure illnss. In fact, from the perspecitive of the Biblical writers we ARE gods! We can perform the miracles of the Bible and then some. But we haven't controlled our use of that power and now there are some billions too many of us. We are in real danger of crushing the world under our weight.
Exactly... And that is strange no? I mean, we all know that curing illness is good. But what if the people you cure are not moral as well and controlling their own desire to procreate?
So, that was my point to jar... we may know what is good, but we are not omniscient and cannot see that in the end we exterminated ourselves for the sake of wanting to be kind.
Our house of cards has many legs that are crumbling. Some of them we do not even see yet.
Without the help of an all seeing guide, we are blind men leading the blind.
Is acknowedging that fact valuable knowledge itself? jar seems to think it is inane...
It's quite a conundrum we're in.
Check this out in recognition of the pickle:
Matthew 7:3 "Why do you look at the speck of sawdust in your brother's eye and pay no attention to the plank in your own eye? 4 How can you say to your brother, 'Let me take the speck out of your eye,' when all the time there is a plank in your own eye? 5 You hypocrite, first take the plank out of your own eye, and then you will see clearly to remove the speck from your brother's eye. 6 "Do not give dogs what is sacred; do not throw your pearls to pigs. If you do, they may trample them under their feet, and then turn and tear you to pieces.
(I have problems obeying that last line.... still more to learn)
Why would Jesus tell us to do that which we cannot do for ourselves? If we cannot take the plank out of our own eye unless we are omniscient then what shall we do?
Sit here and die like leppers?
Edited by scottness, : No reason given.

John 14:18 I will not leave you as orphans; I will come to you.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 72 by NosyNed, posted 01-11-2007 10:28 AM NosyNed has not replied

  
Rob 
Suspended Member (Idle past 5877 days)
Posts: 2297
Joined: 06-01-2006


Message 96 of 221 (376365)
01-11-2007 10:59 PM
Reply to: Message 84 by iceage
01-11-2007 3:12 PM


Knowledge anew to you and a few...
Sure, but how do you know you are surrendering to the true God and not some demigod or maybe even Satan.
Be cause when I gave my life to Him, I spoke His name... Jesus. Not to mention that this Spirit that now posesses me and gives me knowledge as He sees fit, also will not permit me to do wrong without acknowledging such. Honesty does not come from satan.
Faith and mystical beliefs cannot be trusted and that is amply demonstrated by history and 10000+ disparate religious system that exist within the realm of human thought.
Your own philosophy is a religion, you just don't realize that yet because you lack such knowledge that I try to give, and it appears that you absolutely refuse any such knowledge that might reveal that to you.
Your statement about mystical beliefs is the old Humean position (and even that is new knowledge to you. You thought it novel didn't you? Or that everybody knows that what you said is true?).
It's become one of the assumptions of our post-modern culture. it's never even questioned. It is a metaphysical statement that proposes that metaphysical statements are not trustworthy. Go figure... you killed your own absolute. It is a violent contradiction.
You exemplify G.K. Chestertons's Suicide of thought:
"But the new rebel is a Skeptic, and will not entirely trust anything. He has no loyalty; therefore he can never be a real revolutionist. And the fact that he doubts everything, really gets in his way when he wants to denounce anything. For all denunciation implies a moral doctrine of some kind, and the modern revolutionist doubts not only the institution he denounces, but also the doctrine by which he denounces it.
Thus he writes one book complaining that imperial oppression insults the purity of women, and then he writes another book (about the sex problem) in which he insults it himself. He curses the Sultan because Christian girls lose their virginity and then curses Mrs. Grundy when they keep it. As a politician, he will cry out that war is a waste of life, and then, as a philosopher, that all life is a waste of time. A man denounces marriage as a lie, and then denounces aristocratic profligates for treating it as a lie. He calls a flag a bauble, and then blames the oppressors of Poland and Ireland because they take away that bauble.
The man of this school goes first to a political meeting, where he complains that savages are treated as if they were beasts; then he takes his hat and umbrella and goes on to a scientific meeting, where he proves that they practically are beasts. In short, the modern revolutionist, being an infinite skeptic, is always engaged in undermining his own mines. In his book on politics he attacks men for trampling on morality; in his book on ethics he attacks morality for trampling on men. Therefore the modern man in revolt has become practically useless for all purposes of revolt. By rebelling against everything he has lost his right to rebel against anything."
(Orthodoxy, Chapter title - The Suicide of Thought / 1908)
As the professor in The Lion The Witch And The Wardrobe asked,
'What do they teach these kids at school today?'
And... will they let you reason with them about anything different? Or are they absolutely resoved to have it their way?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 84 by iceage, posted 01-11-2007 3:12 PM iceage has not replied

  
Rob 
Suspended Member (Idle past 5877 days)
Posts: 2297
Joined: 06-01-2006


Message 100 of 221 (376384)
01-12-2007 12:19 AM
Reply to: Message 98 by iceage
01-11-2007 11:51 PM


Re: End of silly game playing
However, I have faith , that the path to our destiny involves the continued accumulation of knowledge and extension of the capabilities of the self-aware universe (humans and other higher lifeforms are pieces of self-aware universe).
Well, we all have faith in something. I gave up on pantheism a long time ago for reasons we can get into in a different thread. But it does meld nicely with the evolutionary theory. It's going to be a big hit. An absolute craze!
It appears I've about worn my welcome. people are getting pissy. The thread is y'alls...

This message is a reply to:
 Message 98 by iceage, posted 01-11-2007 11:51 PM iceage has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 101 by iceage, posted 01-12-2007 12:38 AM Rob has replied
 Message 103 by anglagard, posted 01-12-2007 1:08 AM Rob has replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024