If you are suggesting that the Scriptures we have now are not actually the 'real' scriptures, then the burden of proof remains with the one making the assertion-- in which case, I think we'd all like to know how this esoteric knowledge has come into your possession.
how is it esoteric? this is not esoteric if you know anything about how historians do things
the answer for you is, that we have compared different versions of the bible texts and found they are not the same, later ones have things inserted, things removed, things reworded
they have carbon-dated the materals of many older bibles i believe as well, nothing has been found from first to second century that are completely like the ones we have now
™ Version 4.2
