Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
0 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,901 Year: 4,158/9,624 Month: 1,029/974 Week: 356/286 Day: 12/65 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Reasons for Creationist Persistence
jar
Member (Idle past 423 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 14 of 220 (394057)
04-09-2007 1:21 PM
Reply to: Message 13 by Percy
04-09-2007 12:45 PM


The Current Plan of the Christian Cult of Ignorance
The lessons learned in Kansas and other places, taught the Biblical Creationist, ID cult that even controlling school boards is not sufficient. The current plan is to make yet another end run, bypassing even that level. Instead, the plan is to isolate the children into thought limiting Church Schools and Home Schools. That way the children can be kept in near total ignorance.

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

This message is a reply to:
 Message 13 by Percy, posted 04-09-2007 12:45 PM Percy has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 15 by mjfloresta, posted 04-09-2007 1:47 PM jar has replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 423 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 18 of 220 (394072)
04-09-2007 2:23 PM
Reply to: Message 15 by mjfloresta
04-09-2007 1:47 PM


Re: The Current Plan of the Christian Cult of Ignorance
Jar's above statement reflects what I perceive to be the concensus opinion of this site, that is, the idea that the Christian/Creationist paradigm somehow "keeps" such students in a state of ignorance resulting in an incapability to reason and perform, especially in the sciences.
Not at all, it is not an indictment of Christian/Creationist positions at all. In fact I am a Christian Creationist. It is an indictment of the Christian Cult of Ignorance which would include all YECS, Biblical Creationists and most ID supporters.
While the high reknown of "fundamentalist christian scientists" throughout the centuries bears witness to the absurdity of such a claim, it is not to antiquity that I want to turn, but to the present.
Again, an example of the Christian Cult of Ignorance tactic of sleight of hand and misdirection. No scientific advance has ever been made based on Christian belief or theology.
As one who falls into both of Jar's favorite categories ("Fundamentalist Christian and Home-schooled student) my personal experience as well as those of countless friends and acquaintances categorically denies any such implication as a result of being raised with a pardaigm of "ignorance"...
Again, the Christian Cult of Ignorance tactic of misdirection and sleight of hand can be seen.
I do NOT discount home schooling. In fact I believe that real schooling is best done at home. What I say is that the Christian Cult of Ignorance has decided to use home schooling and church schooling as tools to promote ignorance and to isolate their children from any possibility of being exposed to truth.
It is not home schooling or even church schools that are the problem, but rather the perversion of those tools to allow the Christian Cult of Ignorance to maintain control of the children's access to information. I have no issues with either home schooling or church schools. I personally am a product of Church Schools and much of what I know is a direct result of things taught to me at home.
Although many similar claims have been leveled before - at me, at acquaintances, and at home-schoolers/christians at large..never is there any standard of measurement applied by those asserting the claim. HOWEVER, based on the traditionally-valued standards of academic success, I find these claims to be absolutely baseless and ad hominem in nature, as such claims are never empirically validated.
Well, supporting evidence is the fact that there are people who believe in a Young Earth and Biblical Creationism. Such people are either ignorant, deluded or liars.
The reason that the Christian Cult of Ignorance is turning to Church Schools and Home Schooling is that they know that their core beliefs, Biblical Creationism and or Young Earth, can not stand up to examination. They know from experience that if children are allowed to learn the truth, they will abandon such nonsense. In addition, they know that society will watch their efforts in a more open environment such as the public school system.
The only hope for the Christian Cult of Ignorance is to isolate the kids, to keep them in intellectual bondage as long as possible, to give brainwashing and indoctrinating the best chance and to keep the children from developing critical thinking skills.

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

This message is a reply to:
 Message 15 by mjfloresta, posted 04-09-2007 1:47 PM mjfloresta has not replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 423 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 32 of 220 (394229)
04-10-2007 11:26 AM
Reply to: Message 31 by AdminQuetzal
04-10-2007 9:31 AM


DorfMan demonstrates the Biblical Creationist Persistence
The posts from DorfMan in this thread are a classic example of the tactics, very successful tactics, of the Biblical Creationist.
They operate on several levels. One is to inject as many spurious and irrelevant side issues into a discussion as possible in order to disrupt any possible reasonable conversation on their targeted subject. The second is to try to manipulate the discussion so that they will force the opposing side to disproportionate response. It is the classic tactic of all terrorist throughout history.
The content of DorfMan's posts shows that the goal of the Christian Cult of Ignorance is not to increase knowledge, learning or understanding but rather to disrupt efforts at learning and promote ignorance.
If people like DorfMan are sanctioned or banned, it simply promotes their end.
There is no doubt that DorfMan can post many silly and nonsense message during his irregular hit and run attacks on EvC. But those posts cause only a small amount of damage and also create a great and good opportunity.
The record stands for all to read.
People will see DorfMan's posts. They will also see the responses of others.
But if we ban DorfMan, it simply makes him yet another Martyr which is what the terrorists want.
Biblical Creationists are Persistent because the tactic works. Like all Terrorists, they try to cause a small annoyance that results in their target over responding.

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

This message is a reply to:
 Message 31 by AdminQuetzal, posted 04-10-2007 9:31 AM AdminQuetzal has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 35 by kuresu, posted 04-10-2007 2:19 PM jar has not replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 423 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 68 of 220 (394303)
04-10-2007 4:54 PM
Reply to: Message 63 by mjfloresta
04-10-2007 4:41 PM


And so the what is a Creationist question again surfaces.
I am a Creationist.
That said, anyone who believes in a Young Earth, or a Biblical Creation, or Special Creation, or the Biblical Flood, is simply wrong.
Those folk though continue to try to con the public by misdirection. They make claims, as you have, false claims, such as the DI list of "Creation Scientists" implying that there is anyone who has done "Creation Science".
The fact is that no one has ever presented a model that explains the evidence seen using theology, beyond the simple assertion that Goddidit, which explains nothing.

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

This message is a reply to:
 Message 63 by mjfloresta, posted 04-10-2007 4:41 PM mjfloresta has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 71 by crashfrog, posted 04-10-2007 5:03 PM jar has not replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 423 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 84 of 220 (394344)
04-10-2007 7:28 PM
Reply to: Message 83 by crashfrog
04-10-2007 7:12 PM


Re: And so the what is a Creationist question again surfaces.
Well, no, you really can't. Rejecting science because it conflicts with religious dogma is a crucial part of being a creationist.
So you assert. Looks a lot like the typical Fundy assertion though.
I believe in Creation, that GOD created all that is, that will be.
Science is just a way of us learning how GOD did it.
You are free to pretend any definition you come up with is valid, but when presented with evidence that conflicts with your definition, is it time to reevaluate your assumption?

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

This message is a reply to:
 Message 83 by crashfrog, posted 04-10-2007 7:12 PM crashfrog has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 85 by crashfrog, posted 04-10-2007 8:09 PM jar has not replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 423 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 103 of 220 (394526)
04-11-2007 9:32 PM
Reply to: Message 102 by Buzsaw
04-11-2007 9:18 PM


Re: Creo Scientists
I do know that the ICR folks have done field research on the Grand Canyon and Mt St Helens et al. I have videos of those.
They also play fast and loose with the facts in those videos, not even coming close to the truth, and those videos are great examples of trying to con the gullible.
There is NO Science in those videos, only shell games. But worry not. They got their money which is all they wanted.

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

This message is a reply to:
 Message 102 by Buzsaw, posted 04-11-2007 9:18 PM Buzsaw has not replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 423 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 161 of 220 (399168)
05-04-2007 10:15 AM
Reply to: Message 155 by Pete OS
05-04-2007 1:41 AM


Re: don't be too hard on us
Welcome Home.!

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

This message is a reply to:
 Message 155 by Pete OS, posted 05-04-2007 1:41 AM Pete OS has not replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 423 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 168 of 220 (399235)
05-04-2007 3:13 PM
Reply to: Message 166 by Pete OS
05-04-2007 1:09 PM


On Ethics and the lack of ethics in Theology
One problem is that in religion there is no internal ethics policy or procedure.
That may sound contradictory and an extreme claim, that religion is without ethics, but let me try to explain.
In the world of science, you are expected to make your finding public and freely distributed throughout the community, for the purpose of criticism, testing and replication.
This means that you must publish both that data which supports your conclusion as well as the data that does not support it.
Someone in science who publishes false data or even withholds negative material, when discovered, is sanctioned. Sanctioned not for being wrong, but for being dishonest. In addition, the sanctions are extreme and far reaching.
If a scientist is discovered simply withholding data, or worse falsifying or misrepresenting data, it is very likely that not only will they be thrown out of the profession, every single piece of work they have done in the past will be called into question.
There is nothing comparable to the ethics system found in science in the realm of theology.

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

This message is a reply to:
 Message 166 by Pete OS, posted 05-04-2007 1:09 PM Pete OS has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 172 by Archer Opteryx, posted 05-06-2007 11:22 AM jar has not replied
 Message 199 by Phat, posted 06-03-2007 9:47 AM jar has replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 423 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 192 of 220 (403198)
06-01-2007 10:26 AM
Reply to: Message 190 by cavediver
06-01-2007 8:00 AM


Re: If I Was A Creationist ...
And it is the SUPERIORITY that a Christian feels that enables one to so easily dismiss 'secular' scientific views - this is especially true amongst young Christians in their school environment.
Again, only SOME Christian Schools.
I am pretty much the product of Christian Primary School education so I can speak with some reliability about at least one such school. The reality there was that there was no isolation from secular views or science.
BUT...
... there are also the Christian Avoidance Schools, many, many here in the US. They really began expanding about 1958 over here and at first were simply opened so little Johnny or little Sally wouldn't have to go to school with black kids.
As color gradually became less and less a factor for the kids themselves, some new enemy was needed to keep the schools filled and the money flowing in. Science was a great substitute even though they did not set bigotry aside, just redirected it towards other populations such as atheists and homosexuals.
What you describe though is representative of the Christian Cult of Ignorance.

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

This message is a reply to:
 Message 190 by cavediver, posted 06-01-2007 8:00 AM cavediver has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 194 by cavediver, posted 06-01-2007 11:10 AM jar has replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 423 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 196 of 220 (403220)
06-01-2007 11:38 AM
Reply to: Message 194 by cavediver
06-01-2007 11:10 AM


Re: If I Was A Creationist ...
Given a clique of two or three minimum, they will have the confidence and superiority complex to laugh at all the evolution/secular teaching - this attitude is carefully nurtured on Sundays.
Very true. Peer pressure and support is extremely important in many such cases, particularly when there is only a weak sense of self as espoused in so many Christian Cult of Ignorance Churches.
It begins with the indoctrination that all mankind is evil and born sinful and unable to control their own behavior (add a u on your side of the pond) or beliefs, that to question "Authority" is wrong.
A somewhat funny aside, speaking of cliques.
As at all schools, my class broke down into cliques. Two stand out in my memory, "The Gross Four" that had six members and the "Elite Eleven" with fifteen members.
The situation you picture though is magnified over here on this side of the pond. Here, nearly every church, particularly the Christian Cult of Ignorance Churches, has a school. They are everywhere. The sole purpose of these schools is to isolate the kids from any information that might conflict with dogma.
We also have the home school phenomena exemplified at it's worst by the curriculum from Beka Academy. The kids that are being brainwashed under systems such as ABeka Books have almost no chance of ever learning the truth about either science or Christianity and all too often, should they actually get exposed to truth the result is a total abandonment of their religious beliefs.

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

This message is a reply to:
 Message 194 by cavediver, posted 06-01-2007 11:10 AM cavediver has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 197 by Taz, posted 06-01-2007 1:01 PM jar has not replied
 Message 207 by anastasia, posted 06-03-2007 9:16 PM jar has replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 423 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 200 of 220 (403478)
06-03-2007 10:07 AM
Reply to: Message 199 by Phat
06-03-2007 9:47 AM


Re: On Ethics and the lack of ethics in Theology
An interesting collection of typical assertions and nonsense. Tell a half truth and hope the mark doesn't notice that you palmed the pea.
There is no surefire way to test theology.
But there are ways to test many of the claims. For example, a theological position that the Earth is only 6000 years old is factually wrong.
I am going to reprint an argument that I read on an orthodox blog website.
Again, what is "Orthodox?"
The article itself is simply a collection of lies. Lies couched in convenient rhetoric to try to misdirect the reader.
Some examples:
But inquiry”discussion, questions, conversation”is about finding answers, not about endlessly questioning.
False dichotomy. Endlessly questioning is does not exclude finding answers. By endlessly questioning you find the answers and then go on to find even more answers.
The writer even admits that he is lying to the audience in the very next sentence...
It is about finding a deeper understanding of both the questions and the answers, whether those answers are revealed to us in Scripture or are simply products of experience.
A deeper understanding. So you don't stop at the surface answer "Jesus is the Answer" but go on to ask "What does that mean?"
A couple paragraphs later the author once again lies to the audience whe he says...
The point is a simple one: if no final answers exist, then ultimately the best that we can do is opinion.
That again is simply false. We can do more than just "opinion" we can have "opinion backed up by fact or reason." In fact, you can have a whole series, a body of knowledge backed up by fact or reason yet still go on questioning.
The rest of the article is simply more lies based on the initial con job.

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

This message is a reply to:
 Message 199 by Phat, posted 06-03-2007 9:47 AM Phat has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 201 by Phat, posted 06-03-2007 10:33 AM jar has replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 423 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 204 of 220 (403504)
06-03-2007 2:37 PM
Reply to: Message 201 by Phat
06-03-2007 10:33 AM


Re: On Ethics and the lack of ethics in Theology
My point is that if you question everything, including whether you even exist or not, you can never have a foundational belief.
Good. Nothing should be questioned more or more often than any foundational beliefs.
The foundation is what everything else rests on so only a damn fool doesn't question and test the foundation.
But look at your example, the old Biblical Christian Cult of Ignorance fall back trick of spouting "including whether you even exist or not" as though it even made sense or had significance. They trot this old piece of dead meat out just like they trot out the dead meat of Absolute Morality andf Absolute Truth. It's just another method to misdirect folks attention while the conman palms the pea.
Whether you exist or not is irrelevant. It's the kind of thing philosophers bring up to hide the fact that they really have nothing worthwhile to contribute. Whether you exit, or you are just some figment or heartburn from eating too many tamales, your experiences are all you have to go by.
It doesn't matter if they are real or not... they are all you got. Deal with it.
Bringing up an example such as that is just part of the Christian Conman misdirecting you so you don't see him palming the pea.
It is part of his brainwashing you and in reality it means "Don't question what I tell you and ignore the man behind the curtain!"
The problem is there is no Ethics Committee in religion that will catch folk lying like that and sanction them as there is in science.

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

This message is a reply to:
 Message 201 by Phat, posted 06-03-2007 10:33 AM Phat has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 205 by Phat, posted 06-03-2007 5:07 PM jar has replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 423 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 206 of 220 (403524)
06-03-2007 6:17 PM
Reply to: Message 205 by Phat
06-03-2007 5:07 PM


Re: On Ethics and the lack of ethics in Theology
Where is this conman?
In your example that YOU presented and that YOU alleged was from some Christian source. You found the example. You supposedly provided a quote.
The person you were quoting was lying, was pulling a con, was trying to misdirect the audience.
Why is it that you portray virtually every Christian who disagrees with you as some caricature of P.T. Barnum who is sneaking out the back of the tent with all of the loot?
Sorry but that is a pretty good description of much of Christianity. You picked the example. I based my comments on the actual text YOU supplied.
All I am saying is that Theology does not always have to defer to Science when it comes to honest appraisals of the world we inhabit.
Irrelevant and absolutely unrelated to anything I've said.
Phat, you chose and presented the comment in Message 199 AND you asked me to comment on it.

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

This message is a reply to:
 Message 205 by Phat, posted 06-03-2007 5:07 PM Phat has not replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 423 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 208 of 220 (403545)
06-03-2007 9:29 PM
Reply to: Message 207 by anastasia
06-03-2007 9:16 PM


Re: If I Was A Creationist ...
Beka Books is an outgrowth money maker for Pensacola Christian College, another of the Unaccredited Christian Cult of Ignorance Schools.

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

This message is a reply to:
 Message 207 by anastasia, posted 06-03-2007 9:16 PM anastasia has not replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 423 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 213 of 220 (403604)
06-04-2007 12:45 PM
Reply to: Message 210 by Phat
06-04-2007 9:53 AM


Re: Theological philosophy is not always ignorant
But so far what you have presented has been.
No Minister, Deacon, or Texas philosopher has any monopoly on truth. Theology is not subject to the disciplines of science. It is a belief and nothing more.
Irrelevant.
The source you quoted was lying, was committing a fraud, was misdirecting the audiences attention and was asserting a falsehood.
You are totally refusing to even address the issues in the very material you presented.
You are also pulling the old Gish Gallop. Instead of addressing the issue you simply deny there was a problem and then toss out yet another pile of spaghetti.
If I were to ask whether the Gospels came from God or from human authorship and inspiration, you could find yourself in a similar dilemma that the men in this scriptural example found themselves.
Why? Only if YOU wrote what my imagined answer would be.
Let's look at your answer as YOU provided them.
The way that I interpreted this lesson from the Bible is that Jesus dealt with men who asked him questions hoping to discredit his message and his intelligence---all the while having an agenda of their own. (Perhaps they too wanted to palm a pea? )
What is it in the passages that provides any support for your position? Do you know the required qualification for a Priest or to preach in the Temple during Jesus life?
Lets look at the question that Jesus asked in modern context. Jesus answered their question with a question because the answer to His question was also the answer to their question.
No where in the passage does anyone answer his question.
I will agree with you guys that there is much ignorance in organized religion, particularly when it comes to education and science. What I won't agree with is that there is only one proper way to view Christianity and every other teaching is simply a lie and/or ignorant.
But no one has said that; I certainly have not said that. What I have done is analyze the material that YOU provided and pointed out exactly how it was either a lie or willfully ignorant, which is simply lying to oneself.
Deal with it.
If I were to ask whether the Gospels came from God or from human authorship and inspiration, you could find yourself in a similar dilemma that the men in this scriptural example found themselves.
Very unlikely and actually a really ignorant assertion. This goes back to the very first part of the quote from Matthew...
Matt 21:23-27-- Jesus entered the temple courts, and, while he was teaching, the chief priests and the elders of the people came to him. "By what authority are you doing these things?" they asked. "And who gave you this authority?"
Now let me ask you a question.
Why would the priests ask that question?
Finally you posted this jewel.
Perhaps, like them, you would be the most honest if you simply said "I don't know."
Come on Phat. Again, that is totally refuted by the very material you presented. Read it. Stop just grabbing soundbites.
From your quote.
They discussed it among themselves and said, "If we say, 'From heaven,' he will ask, 'Then why didn't you believe him?' But if we say, 'From men'-we are afraid of the people, for they all hold that John was a prophet."
There is no honesty in their response. Like today's Biblical Christian Cult of Ignorance Preachers, they based their answer not on the merit of the question itself, but rather on the perceived results of a given response.

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

This message is a reply to:
 Message 210 by Phat, posted 06-04-2007 9:53 AM Phat has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024