Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,901 Year: 4,158/9,624 Month: 1,029/974 Week: 356/286 Day: 12/65 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Omniscience, Omnipotence, the Fall & Logical Contradictions.
sidelined
Member (Idle past 5937 days)
Posts: 3435
From: Edmonton Alberta Canada
Joined: 08-30-2003


Message 74 of 354 (355543)
10-10-2006 8:22 AM
Reply to: Message 72 by iano
10-09-2006 6:54 AM


Re: Timelessness now, ladies and gents!
iano
If he is indeed outside time then knowing it happened is the means by which he knows it is going to happen.
I am curious here as to why you seem to think God being outside of time somehow means he can still access time. Being outside of time means what exactly?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 72 by iano, posted 10-09-2006 6:54 AM iano has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 76 by iano, posted 10-10-2006 11:24 AM sidelined has replied

  
sidelined
Member (Idle past 5937 days)
Posts: 3435
From: Edmonton Alberta Canada
Joined: 08-30-2003


Message 77 of 354 (355597)
10-10-2006 11:29 AM
Reply to: Message 76 by iano
10-10-2006 11:24 AM


Re: Timelessness now, ladies and gents!
iano
I am using the device of timelessness to illustrate the flawed nature of that latter argument: the one that decides what is logical must be the case in fact.
No,you cannot merely assert something without explaining the basis for taking this stance since it does nothing to bolster your position and, indeed, serves to undermine it.
My question is how a God performs an act when he is removed from the dimension of time which is necessary to perform an action in the first place.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 76 by iano, posted 10-10-2006 11:24 AM iano has not replied

  
sidelined
Member (Idle past 5937 days)
Posts: 3435
From: Edmonton Alberta Canada
Joined: 08-30-2003


Message 142 of 354 (361800)
11-05-2006 7:55 AM
Reply to: Message 127 by Christian7
11-04-2006 2:31 PM


Re: God: Just or Unjust?
iBibleNano
Forknowledge - Knowing in advance what will happen. (No effect produced)
Predistination - Bringing about a future event. (An effect is produced)
If forknowledge is certain then the event that it forsees must come to pass and thus indeed become an effect.
Edited by sidelined, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 127 by Christian7, posted 11-04-2006 2:31 PM Christian7 has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 143 by Christian7, posted 11-05-2006 10:54 AM sidelined has replied

  
sidelined
Member (Idle past 5937 days)
Posts: 3435
From: Edmonton Alberta Canada
Joined: 08-30-2003


Message 145 of 354 (361813)
11-05-2006 11:01 AM
Reply to: Message 143 by Christian7
11-05-2006 10:54 AM


Re: God: Just or Unjust?
iBibleNano
Any event that will come to pass will come to pass, therefore we can't change it. Is that not an effect in itself? Yet we still have free will.
But if the future event must come to pass in order for forknowledge to exist then we cannot avoid what that forknowledge represents and thus cannot avoid it by exercise of free will

This message is a reply to:
 Message 143 by Christian7, posted 11-05-2006 10:54 AM Christian7 has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 146 by Christian7, posted 11-05-2006 11:57 AM sidelined has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024