quote:
Actually it creates a problem. If it is true that when man gains access to the true good, he comes to an OPPOSITE conclusion than what God had been telling them (with regard to how they should live), then how can God be the transmitter of good?
From Genesis 3:5 "For God knows that when you eat of it your eyes will be opened, and you will be like God, knowing good and evil."
And the serpent seems to be correct:
Genesis 3:22 And the LORD God said, "The man has now become like one of us, knowing good and evil. He must not be allowed to reach out his hand and take also from the tree of life and eat, and live forever."
It would seem to me that man does know good from evil. However, according to theology, man lacks the knowledge to appropriately apply these concepts. Also, man still has to be guided in his relationship with God, which would seem to be separate from knowing good and evil. It is a fine line, I will grant you that, between knowing good and evil and BEING good.
Also, it is the tree of knowledge of good and evil, not the tree of all knowledge. Therefore, man would not carry away the knowledge to make themselves immortal flesh. And again, this is my understanding of christian theology, not necessarily my opinion on the reality of morals. I myself believe that basic morality, those ethics that every culture shares, are ingrained into each person. An instinctual moral code, so to speak. However, there are morals that not every culture shares and those seem to be memetic, an ethos passed down from generation to generation.