Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,902 Year: 4,159/9,624 Month: 1,030/974 Week: 357/286 Day: 13/65 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   How did animal get to isolated places after the flood?
sidelined
Member (Idle past 5937 days)
Posts: 3435
From: Edmonton Alberta Canada
Joined: 08-30-2003


Message 124 of 194 (386009)
02-18-2007 10:55 PM
Reply to: Message 108 by riVeRraT
02-15-2007 6:31 PM


Re: answer is easy.
riVeRrat
Show me one thing that is not subjective.
Allow me to refer you to Martin Gardner's Buzz saw so that you can see a piece of objective evidence in action.If you can see a way that allows for another answer by all means present it. That way we can establish that it is indeed subjective.
http://explorepdx.com/buzsaw.html

This message is a reply to:
 Message 108 by riVeRraT, posted 02-15-2007 6:31 PM riVeRraT has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 134 by riVeRraT, posted 02-19-2007 9:16 PM sidelined has replied

  
sidelined
Member (Idle past 5937 days)
Posts: 3435
From: Edmonton Alberta Canada
Joined: 08-30-2003


Message 150 of 194 (386318)
02-20-2007 9:50 PM
Reply to: Message 134 by riVeRraT
02-19-2007 9:16 PM


Re: answer is easy.
riVeRrat
Good link, and a very good attempt at trying to prove that something is objective. But it all relys on measurement, which can never be 100% acurrate
Plus, if you start with a cube that is 3 inches, and make a cut, you lose the width of the blade in the cut, and will wind up with pieces less than one inch. Another poorly written attempt.
The accuracy of the cut has no bearing on the question posed which is
stated thus
A carpenter, working with a buzz saw, wishes to cut a wooden cube, three inches on a side, into 27 one-inch cubes. He can do this job easily by making six cuts through the cube, keeping the pieces together in the cube shape. Can he reduce the number of necessary cuts by rearranging the pieces after each cut?
The number of sides of a cube are not dependent on the accuracy of the cut itself. Since the cube must have 6 sides then the number of cuts cannot be reduced and this is an objective result independent of a persons desire otherwise.
Edited by sidelined, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 134 by riVeRraT, posted 02-19-2007 9:16 PM riVeRraT has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 154 by riVeRraT, posted 02-21-2007 9:02 AM sidelined has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024