Were there Dinosaurs in the Bible?

Perhaps the Biblical answer lies in the details of the curse upon the serpents in Genesis 3: 15, "And I will put enmity between you and the woman, and between your seed and her seed; he shall bruise your head and you shall bruise his heel."The serpent was radically changed at the fall, according to the Genesis account. The clear implication is that the prefallen ones had longer legs and were walking and possibly flying creatures. Imo, the prefallen serpents were the dinosaurs whose offspring became snakes, lizzards, allegators, etc. They are all of the serpent family. Likely two not mentioned results were diminished intelligence and poisonous venom. The serpents were the most intelligent of the animal kingdom at creation according to the account. A lot happened at this catastrophy of the fall, including thorny plants and so forth. I believe some plants became poisonous as well.I do not agree with most creationists such as ICR who believe and teach that dinosaurs were in Noah's ark. I do believe however, that the parent prefallen dinosaurs lived very long lives and many survived until the flood which would have been about 1500 years since many humans lived nearly a thousand years.

Thanks for the welcome. But... what about scientists' way of dating the fossils of dinosaurs? Scientists say that there were mass extinctions of dinosaur species around 65-70 million years ago. Have we really found human bones that date as far back as that? If the answer would be that some of them could have died off before Adam and Eve were "created", it would still pose a problem since none of "God's" creations can die yet before Adam and Eve disobeyed "God".

There's a good chance that the smaller ones did not becoming extinct. They are called birds.

They didn't all become extinct. Stop by your zoo's aviary and you can see what's left of the dinosaurs.

Shave a gorilla and you'd have something that looks like a human. Does that prove that Adam was an ape to you? Somehow I doubt it.

There are significant differences between crocodiles and dinosaurs, not the least of which is the fact that dinosaurs were warm-blooded while crocs are not; as well, crocs predate dinosaurs by millions of years.

Plenty of mammals lay eggs, as do birds. Egg-laying is not unique to reptiles.

Dinosaurs aren't reptiles, Buz. For one thing, no reptile is warm-blooded.

Humans and chimpanzees, for example, are considerably more similar than any dinosaur is to a reptile.

As I said, not all dinoaurs were wiped out. The small ones survived. Ultimately, as their environments were encroached by the much more successful mammals, the only dinosaurs who survived were the ones who enjoyed the advantages of feathers and flight.

Because it's not fallacious, it's true. Dinosaurs are not reptiles. Reptiles are cold-blooded; dinosaurs are not.

As I recall, you abandonded the thread where we were "going over this".

Ned, to my knowledge, has not disagreed.

Dinosaurs are certainly members of class Reptilia, but they are not, to my knowledge, reptiles. They're dinosaurs.

Irrelevant question. I make no secret that I'm no biologist, and I've cited all my sources.

Dinosaurs inhabited the Earth for several hundred million years. The fuel in your auto is a distalant of the crude oil that made up the plant material of they're time. Man was NOT contemporary with dinosaurs. The time line is very clear. Now there are creatures extant today that were contemporary with Dinosaurs such as turtles, some insects, sharks, etc.. but bipedal homonids did not ever lay eyes on a T.rex until the first bones of T. rex where uncovered millions of years post theyre demise. Now your beliefs are beliefs but lets not confuse the facts. The whole of science disagrees with man being conterporary with Dinosaurs Buzz. Your hypothesis is totally flies in the face of what is born out in current supported theories.

, I understand you believe that Dinosaurs were around during the antediluvian time, but has there really been any genuine hard evidence that supprorts the notion of man and Dinosaurs existence?

You can check out this site to get a good overview of the understanding of dinosaurs and the evidence used to argue the points.FossilNews.com – A Blog On All Things Fossil And More…

Well, the sources I provided - two textbooks of undergraduate and graduate level - did counter, and were more authoritative, than anything you provided, which were:
1) Your own assertion
2) An unnamed dictionary
3) Google