Egyptology Sets Up A Straw Man

Suggest you know what the definition of fallacies are before you through the words around.

It sounds Garrett like you have some doubts about dating methods. There is a whole forum for those. If you have any doubts perhaps you'd like to bring them up there.

I'm not sure Ifen, that you're attempt to help Hep on being more careful about his sources is going to work.After being shown, conclusively (even he agreed) that one clear claim of a source was wrong and utterly stupid. He carries on accepting all else. He has a very, very weak BS detector.

But Ray, me boy, the only point of agreement here is that it is a book. Everything else is the subject of discussion and no one is "insulting" anyone by simply disagreeing with there views.You don't insult RAZD by disagreeing with the explanatory power of the ToE. You simple have to expect to be challenged on it. If you want RAZD to think the Bible is somehow "more" (whatever the heck that means) than a book you'll have to back it up. That is the point of threads in this forum. It is crystal clear that the declarations are not crystal clear to everyone. This is something else you have to support. It is, I repeat, NOT an insult to disagree with someone. Now this is getting a bit closer to insulting. You aren't discussing the issue, the evidence or the logic; you are simple making wild assertions about the motives of others. A bad habit of yours Ray.