Egyptology Sets Up A Straw Man

A question for you ray, if david was a big deal, a person who ruled vast lands, how come there isn't any record outside the bible about him? why is it that no writers of that time gave him space?the bible is as much evidence as the history of the greek ocupation of greece was, ie: myths to give the people racial unity
troy has more evidence than king david, atlantis does tooI love how you revert to taking pot shots at evolutionists when you can't find answers, bravo!where is evidence of saul, the evidence has to be outside the bibleThis message has been edited by ReverendDG, 01-06-2006 02:57 AM

Amazing you have nothing so you attack my user name, who says i'm a reverend of your bible? so I am a false witness because i chose this name? Try reading about rome, greece, england,lreland,scotland, hey anything on history so greece and rome don't count then? or do you just ignore alexander the great? thats just silly do you really think historians care about some defeat? now if the history of the bible was 100% true they could back it up how about rome,greece, hey heres a link to a list of defeats List of Mesopotamian dynasties - Wikipedia
recording where the kingship switched cities would be a defeat, unless you streach logicwhy is the evolution stuff even relevent? could you stay on topic? so what you are saying is there couldn't be another reason? isn't that a bit unreasonable? maybe I don't know.. it didn't happen? strange that you ignore that *many* people back then recorded things on scrolls! the egyptians used scrolls, so did many of the people around the hebrews, like the greeks, the persians,etc - you are claiming that the people except the hebrews were primitive you would do well to stop claiming this nonsense, or my ancesters may very well kill you out of annoyance, i find it insulting, in a way, and we arn't very ruddy at all, you need to stop recycling baseless gene scott tripe so i'm anti-biblical because i don't agree with you then?, what a leap of logic, how do you know they are historical, there is no evidence for anything, unless you can show it so asking you to back up what you say as opposed to swallowing it shows bias?, whether I agree with evolution is irrelevent ray!
you are just evading everything
post something other than tired old arguements and accusations pleaseas I said why would they not record david ruling most of the middle east? if you are going to claim this back it up, because someone ruling major lands wouldn't be unrecorded

you really don't understand logical fallicies.. it has nothing to do with theology, being theist or atheist is besides the point

thank you

what is false about it?
what fact? what are you talking about, can you please be even less clear

so, instead of coming up with a good answer, you just quote me?
come on ray you can do better than this, i'm asking a simple question, what does theology have to do with logic or logical falliciesunless you do not understand thier usesage

well i was hoping to get an answer i could challenge but i guess thats too much for ray

sure nope problem, i just wanted to debate sad that ray doesn't want to

http://EvC Forum: Egyptology Sets Up A Straw Man -->EvC Forum: Egyptology Sets Up A Straw Manbeing that you claim eveything i asked you as a strawman in my first post, and percy asked you to learn what a strawman is, and you bring theology into it, when it was irrelevent, points to you diverting the topicbut anyway how about my post?
why would a large area ruled over by david for a peaceful period go unrecordedwhy do you discount romes records of being defeated? why do you ignore historic evidence of defeats in that area?This message has been edited by ReverendDG, 01-08-2006 07:28 PMThis message has been edited by ReverendDG, 01-08-2006 09:05 PM

so, we can't see the truth because god doesn't want us to see it?, then whats the point? no i think its because you just keep saying the same things over and over again, when people show you are wrong..

the point is that you are claiming you can read gods mind, and/or he is a sadistic bastard who, does illogical things such as blinding people to the truth instead of showing them the truth, which sounds more likely? so do oyou have any evidence of this other than claims?, other than that why bring this up at all?

useless post, rayand ramoss is right, all your proof is not from the bible, but from someone who has an agenda to make it look so
by the way can you explain your reasoning for saying people are struck blind when they do not agree with the bible? i find nothing that says that god strikes those who do not give him credit blind, other wise its is a baseless claimThis message has been edited by ReverendDG, 01-21-2006 11:18 PM

hmm i must have missed that, over all the other text, i wouldn't say pauls writings are wrong (i understand his meaning) but i don't agree that god would do such a terrible thing, why would a loving god do such a thing, this is pretty much off topic anyway

i was wrong, good going but you need to be more civil about it,have you read any of his threads?, he never claims hes wrong, only its someone else being blinded, or no god sensewhen i said it was offtopic i think you missed understood me, i meant asking why god would bline people it would be offtopic, i wasn't saying you were off topic in the context of a all forgiving god who loves everyone, namely the common understanding of the christian god, not the jewish god when has he really ever done this?, people told him something he agreed with it, then 5 posts down he says the same nonsense again no he wouldn't be booted instantly!, he might be told he's wrong a few times, but just like a lot of people who want thier view unquestioned he ignores things even after he agrees with thembut whatever works, all i can say is its a debate and people can be wrong, i was wrong, get over it

i wish i had thought out my posts a bit better myself the problem is doctor scott follows some nonsensical beliefs, such as the junk about ireland, sorry but ireland has no realation to isreal, except maybe the same basis that all most all societies have, namely the spread of languages from africa through the middle east to europe, and trading between them.
as for ray, he ends up attacking people so much the admins don't bother anymore because he just seems to meltdown way to fast into insults well sometimes he does drop things, mostly because he doesn't know enough about the subject, which is a normal course, but others..
i'm not sure but one of the gp threads in free for all - http://EvC Forum: PROOF OF GOD -->EvC Forum: PROOF OF GODhe says asgara is right that the gp isn't in the center of egypt i believe then a few pages later he starts saying it is again, even though he agreed it wasn't, i'm not sure which posts it was its hard to argee with someone who uses people on the fringe, and people whos expertese lies not in the subject at hand - amatures that use the information to push beliefs rather than constuct the pastThis message has been edited by ReverendDG, 01-23-2006 04:59 AM