Defeats are not recorded. Why would anyone record the Plagues/Exodus when the Bible says Egypt was destroyed ?
I'll admit upfront I know next to nothing about this period of time (whenever it was
) in terms of biblical or non-biblical history, but it seems to me an obvious question needs to be asked. Maybe it has an obvious or well-known answer - I apologise in advance if that is the case.
Egypt surely didn't exist in a vacuum? If it was 'destroyed' or even just suffered the Biblical plagues combined with the loss of a large number of slaves (at least according to some - I think from previous postings you subscribe to this view) and then the death of the Pharoah and the annihilation of his army it must have been very weakened.
If so doesn't this create a big (and I mean
huge) opportunity for neighbouring Empires and Kingdoms to grab some terrority or for subjugated areas and/or peoples to rise up and try for freedom?
Now
if this happened there are two possible outcomes in each case:
- The Egyptians win
- The other side win
In either case somebody is going to have victories to record - do we see a burst of victories recorded by the Egyptians or their defeats recorded by the victors following on from the period of the plagues and Exodus?
I know it is possible that Egypt went through all these problems with no subsequent problems of the kind I've described, but through history it very often seems that turmoil or disaster in a country provides opportunity which others are willing to exploit.
Edit: I see from the very next post jar asked this sort of thing eight months ago - well I never was the quickest on the block
This message has been edited by MangyTiger, 01-11-2006 07:30 PM
I wish I didn't know now what I didn't know then