Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,916 Year: 4,173/9,624 Month: 1,044/974 Week: 3/368 Day: 3/11 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Why This Belief?
Phat
Member
Posts: 18351
From: Denver,Colorado USA
Joined: 12-30-2003
Member Rating: 1.0


Message 2 of 111 (212878)
05-31-2005 4:25 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by BostonD
05-31-2005 4:22 PM


Relative truth or absolute truth?
It all depends on whether you believe that truth is a relative concept to each individual or each faith versus believing that truth is an absolute value or reality. Jesus said that He was the Truth..the way...and the Life. No man came to the Father except through Him. If He was in fact God incarnate, it would not matter if there were a hundred other religions. It would not matter if there were a hundred other prophets. If Jesus was and is God incarnate, He truly is the only way!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by BostonD, posted 05-31-2005 4:22 PM BostonD has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 3 by BostonD, posted 05-31-2005 4:37 PM Phat has not replied
 Message 4 by ringo, posted 05-31-2005 4:57 PM Phat has not replied
 Message 5 by mikehager, posted 05-31-2005 5:28 PM Phat has not replied

  
Phat
Member
Posts: 18351
From: Denver,Colorado USA
Joined: 12-30-2003
Member Rating: 1.0


Message 24 of 111 (213400)
06-02-2005 3:30 AM
Reply to: Message 18 by crashfrog
06-01-2005 9:16 PM


We have yet to quantify the measure or essence of a thought...or two.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 18 by crashfrog, posted 06-01-2005 9:16 PM crashfrog has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 48 by lfen, posted 06-04-2005 12:04 PM Phat has replied

  
Phat
Member
Posts: 18351
From: Denver,Colorado USA
Joined: 12-30-2003
Member Rating: 1.0


Message 51 of 111 (214179)
06-04-2005 12:55 PM
Reply to: Message 48 by lfen
06-04-2005 12:04 PM


One hand clapping
BostonD writes:
as a scientist, and a novice philosopher, I often steer myself away from spiritual things.
GDR writes:
That is true of just about everyone. We read what we want to into everything. Accepting or rejecting a religious faith requires a paradigm shift in our thinking. That has certainly been true for me both as a Christian and as a non-Christian. ...The human mind has in my view made incredible leaps in understanding the natural world but in my view the human mind hasn't made little if any progress in understanding the world that is outside of the natural in 2000 years
Crashfrog writes:
Doesn't it ever occur to you that the reason this is the case is because there's nothing there to understand - that the natural is all that there is?
We have yet to quantify the measure or essence of a thought...or two.
Ifen writes:
meaning? are you talking about language? symbolic systems? consciousness?
If one is cryptic enough they become irrefutable simply because no one has a clue as to what they are talking about! You know, the sound of one hand clapping.
I mean that there is a source of wisdom. There is an origin of thought,and of consciousness, and of life. As a theologian, and through personal experience, I have found the origin to be God.
Human philosophy did not merely evolve. Intelligence has a designer, and His essence is captured in our best moments. I suppose that the mystery is our worst moments....what essence is THAT?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 48 by lfen, posted 06-04-2005 12:04 PM lfen has not replied

  
Phat
Member
Posts: 18351
From: Denver,Colorado USA
Joined: 12-30-2003
Member Rating: 1.0


Message 53 of 111 (214183)
06-04-2005 1:10 PM
Reply to: Message 50 by Max Power
06-04-2005 12:36 PM


Why THIS belief?
Crashfrog writes:
You found what you wished to find, not what was accurate.
Not everything can be judged by accuracy if human intellect is the limit of the definition of accuracy. In one light, the Bible is highly "innaccurate." This does not mean that all of the philosophers and theologians who espouse its wisdom are mere dummies. Anyone who believes that may as well go worship the human "wisdom" of Dawkins or Sagan!
MAX POWER writes:
is the bible self credible or does society dictate that it is credible?
Which is another way of asking if human wisdom is the origin and standard of credibility or whether the expression and definition of God as defined in a religious book is the description of a belief and an origin NOT of human will. It can be said that theology is more of a faith issue rather than a logic issue. The credibility of Faith can be questioned yet never logically refuted.
NIV writes:
2 Peter 1:21-- For prophecy never had its origin in the will of man, but men spoke from God as they were carried along by the Holy Spirit.
The Bible can be easily criticized and refuted based upon human wisdom as an origin of truth but this book can NEVER be refuted based upon the definition and belief in the God contained within.
As an example, if one believes that the Bible had human wisdom as its origin, one then believes that human wisdom is the origin of all written knowledge or expression.
If one believes that the Bible was authored by humans under the unction and impartation of the Holy Spirit, then one has a belief in a higher power as the origin.
This message has been edited by Phatboy, 06-04-2005 11:14 AM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 50 by Max Power, posted 06-04-2005 12:36 PM Max Power has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 61 by Max Power, posted 06-04-2005 3:11 PM Phat has replied

  
Phat
Member
Posts: 18351
From: Denver,Colorado USA
Joined: 12-30-2003
Member Rating: 1.0


Message 57 of 111 (214190)
06-04-2005 1:26 PM
Reply to: Message 54 by GDR
06-04-2005 1:12 PM


Turning aside to myths.
GDR writes:
Christianity is growing more quickly in Asia, Africa, and S. America than it is in the western world. In this post modern world there appears to be a new appetite for things spiritual, whether it be in the traditional faiths or in something else.
This can be a good thing. People are tired of the same old religious tradition void of any power. Tired of T.V. hucksters who insult human intelligence. It worrys me that people such as Benny Hinn can teach thousands of people overseas their own brand of spirituality. The Bible warns of danger from Post Modern anything goes spirituality.
NIV writes:
2 Tim 4:3-5--For the time will come when men will not put up with sound doctrine. Instead, to suit their own desires, they will gather around them a great number of teachers to say what their itching ears want to hear. They will turn their ears away from the truth and turn aside to myths. But you, keep your head in all situations, endure hardship, do the work of an evangelist, discharge all the duties of your ministry.
This admonition does not refer to any particular belief. In fact, this scripture could apply to men who abuse the Bible itself.
The Bible can be a sound book if it is not abused through human misuse.
This message has been edited by Phatboy, 06-04-2005 11:33 AM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 54 by GDR, posted 06-04-2005 1:12 PM GDR has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 69 by GDR, posted 06-04-2005 5:07 PM Phat has not replied

  
Phat
Member
Posts: 18351
From: Denver,Colorado USA
Joined: 12-30-2003
Member Rating: 1.0


Message 59 of 111 (214195)
06-04-2005 1:36 PM
Reply to: Message 58 by crashfrog
06-04-2005 1:28 PM


Crashfrog writes:
ID is the position that it can be determined scientifically, and has been.
Neither is evolution the position that the hand of God was definately not involved; it is simply the position that all life on Earth can best be explained by the interaction of natural laws.
Good clarification! Spirituality is used to accentuate spiritual matters. Science is used to accentuate natural phenomena.
Dawkins is no more a spiritual person than Ken Ham is a scientist.
If anyone disagrees, than we now have a spirit vs spirit argument.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 58 by crashfrog, posted 06-04-2005 1:28 PM crashfrog has not replied

  
Phat
Member
Posts: 18351
From: Denver,Colorado USA
Joined: 12-30-2003
Member Rating: 1.0


Message 62 of 111 (214222)
06-04-2005 3:28 PM
Reply to: Message 61 by Max Power
06-04-2005 3:11 PM


Re: Why THIS belief?
MAX POWER writes:
I guess my next question is then, how does one "decide" what to have faith in? Don't you still use logic in that decision?
By all means, Yes! Some of us have had intense religious experiences in which we were so affected as to have no logical alternative. Others of us have examined religion and found it deficient in the logic that they needed. Faith has to personally affect you.
I believe that we as humans never "find" God. He "finds" us. It is then up to our logic to accept Him or to reject Him.
Never choose a belief based on blind faith. Blind faith is only used once yiou have already found your belief. Blind faith is really unseeing the outcome yet trusting that it will be a good outcome.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 61 by Max Power, posted 06-04-2005 3:11 PM Max Power has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 63 by Max Power, posted 06-04-2005 3:59 PM Phat has not replied
 Message 64 by ringo, posted 06-04-2005 4:04 PM Phat has not replied
 Message 65 by lfen, posted 06-04-2005 4:10 PM Phat has not replied

  
Phat
Member
Posts: 18351
From: Denver,Colorado USA
Joined: 12-30-2003
Member Rating: 1.0


Message 75 of 111 (214415)
06-05-2005 3:32 AM
Reply to: Message 73 by GDR
06-04-2005 9:51 PM


Original Topic starter writes:
I've read a lot of posts where people describe their belief and how they've had such a moving experience. I understand that people have had a strong experience with Christianity and Jesus, but that doesn't mean you can logically feel that it is right or true.
Many people of other religions have had equally powerful experiences and connections with their holy books, priests, or Gods... if you believe the bible literally or if you truly believe that Jesus was the son of God, then you are in direct contradiction with other religions who have an equal claim on "truth" as you do.
Given that, how do you go on believing what you do? Faith? How can one version of faith be better than another??
GDR writes:
It is just possible that we have wandered off topic here.
I don't think that the metaphysical is necessarily off topic.
Is this a method of defining truth?
To me, the supernatural by definition is an unexplainable phenomena that could be entirely un-natural yet entirely experienced.
One time I distinctly heard several voices at once coming from a person who had no idea that it was happening. Were it a prank, I would have eventually known. Unexplainable? Definitely! Superbnatural? Maybe.
This message has been edited by Phatboy, 06-05-2005 01:34 AM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 73 by GDR, posted 06-04-2005 9:51 PM GDR has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 82 by lfen, posted 06-05-2005 12:07 PM Phat has not replied

  
Phat
Member
Posts: 18351
From: Denver,Colorado USA
Joined: 12-30-2003
Member Rating: 1.0


Message 80 of 111 (214471)
06-05-2005 9:45 AM
Reply to: Message 77 by riVeRraT
06-05-2005 8:04 AM


Re: Jesus
RiverRat writes:
The day that I first really felt and noticed the Holy Spirit in me, is either the day I got baptized in the spirit (which Jesus tells us to do) or the day I went crazy.
I wanna hear about the day that you went crazy!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 77 by riVeRraT, posted 06-05-2005 8:04 AM riVeRraT has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 85 by riVeRraT, posted 06-05-2005 8:54 PM Phat has not replied

  
Phat
Member
Posts: 18351
From: Denver,Colorado USA
Joined: 12-30-2003
Member Rating: 1.0


Message 81 of 111 (214474)
06-05-2005 9:55 AM
Reply to: Message 79 by nator
06-05-2005 8:44 AM


I the Lord do all these things?
Rat writes:
The way I see it now, is that nothing happens without the will of the father.
Scraff writes:
Ouch! There's a lot of bad stuff that is God's will, then.
We have discussed this before. Some say that the Devil was not Gods will. Others quote Isaiah:
NIV writes:
Isa 45:7-I form the light and create darkness,
I bring prosperity and create disaster; I, the LORD, do all these things.
I have brought up the point that God never actually created Satan. Rather, He created a freewill Lucifer who chose to become Satan. God never created fallen angels as fallen. He never created fallen humanity as fallen. He did create the possibility of disobedience which led to the Fall in both angelic and human realms.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 79 by nator, posted 06-05-2005 8:44 AM nator has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 92 by nator, posted 06-06-2005 10:51 PM Phat has replied

  
Phat
Member
Posts: 18351
From: Denver,Colorado USA
Joined: 12-30-2003
Member Rating: 1.0


Message 96 of 111 (214895)
06-07-2005 2:28 AM
Reply to: Message 92 by nator
06-06-2005 10:51 PM


Re: I the Lord do all these things?
Schraff writes:
So, Satan is just as powerful, and probably more powerful than God?
Where did you ever deduce and conclude this?? Satan only has the power that people give him. Unfortunately, that is a lot of power. All of you who smugly think that human reasoning and wisdom has gone beyond the "god myth" are actually playing right into satans hands. I won't argue the point, however. It is best for you to do your best with what you believe.

"It is as impossible for man to demonstrate the existence of God as it would be for even Sherlock Holmes to demonstrate the existence of Arthur Conan Doyle."
---
"Religion points to that area of human experience where in one way or another man comes upon mystery as a summons to pilgrimage."
---
"People are prepared for everything except for the fact that beyond the darkness of their blindness there is a great light. They are prepared to go on breaking their backs plowing the same old field until the cows come home without seeing, until they stub their toes on it, that there is a treasure buried in that field rich enough to buy Texas. They are prepared for a God who strikes hard bargains but not for a God who gives as much for an hour's work as for a day's. They are prepared for a mustard-seed kingdom of God no bigger than the eye of a newt but not for the great banyan it becomes with birds in its branches singing Mozart. They are prepared for the potluck supper at First Presbyterian but not for the marriage supper of the lamb".
Frederick Buechner

This message is a reply to:
 Message 92 by nator, posted 06-06-2005 10:51 PM nator has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 99 by nator, posted 06-07-2005 8:59 AM Phat has replied

  
Phat
Member
Posts: 18351
From: Denver,Colorado USA
Joined: 12-30-2003
Member Rating: 1.0


Message 100 of 111 (214972)
06-07-2005 10:10 AM
Reply to: Message 99 by nator
06-07-2005 8:59 AM


Re: I the Lord do all these things?
Scraff writes:
Wouldn't the parent of even the most ungrateful, bratty, poorly-behaved child still pull that child out of the path of a car if the child wandered into the street?
Yes. However, free will as a concept is much the same as letting your child go off into the night trusting that they will avoid drunk drivers, lecherous perps, and seedy drug dealers. If they O.D. at 1 a.m., that is on them and not on the parents. (Hey--you raise them as best as you can, right?)
You are going to claim that God has the power to foreknow and thus stop all evil from occurring. I will counter that with the premise that God allowed a created society to
1) Be free to choose...leading to evil as a bad choice.
This caused evil to exist in the human realm.(Not our fault personally..but our responsibility collectively)
2) Gave us a way out of it through Christ. Another choice which you personally do not have to make. (Why rebel?)
You have considered the "God" concept and found it lacking. You have thus adapted a human wisdom concept of collective responsibility.
I will agree with human wisdom. We are individually responsible for our decisions in life as well as our choices.
I will also agree that many Christians are none too bright.
We need to learn to grow up and think for ourselves.
I still believe that God is alive, however. My choice to commune with Him as often as possible may be seen by outsiders as a contrived crutch.
I often wonder why these outsiders think that by taking all responsibility upon themselves that they can reasonably take on a universe of uncertainty with nothing more to have faith in than their own evolutionary potential.
I prefer worship of a Creator over mere biological adaptations within
(an evolving) creation. (conclusion: We both have a point. Humans need responsibility yet they also need communion with a living Creator.)
This message has been edited by Phatboy, 06-07-2005 08:11 AM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 99 by nator, posted 06-07-2005 8:59 AM nator has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 101 by nator, posted 06-07-2005 10:41 AM Phat has replied

  
Phat
Member
Posts: 18351
From: Denver,Colorado USA
Joined: 12-30-2003
Member Rating: 1.0


Message 102 of 111 (215096)
06-07-2005 4:55 PM
Reply to: Message 101 by nator
06-07-2005 10:41 AM


Re: I the Lord do all these things?
The flaw in your analogy is that God is an all-powerful, all loving parent while humans are limited by being human.
maybe... However the flaw in YOUR analogy is that if we are the 5 year olds, we have the ability to "wish" our parents away...as if they did not exist.
God...our loving parent...stands near and watches His rebellious 5 year old who wants a world without omnipotant parental authority. He is letting you attempt to grow up without Him. Lets see how far humanity gets with this one! Don't think He won't step back in again when we as a species fall flat on our frontal lobes!
This message has been edited by Phatboy, 06-07-2005 02:57 PM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 101 by nator, posted 06-07-2005 10:41 AM nator has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 103 by nator, posted 06-07-2005 5:57 PM Phat has replied

  
Phat
Member
Posts: 18351
From: Denver,Colorado USA
Joined: 12-30-2003
Member Rating: 1.0


Message 104 of 111 (215238)
06-08-2005 2:27 AM
Reply to: Message 103 by nator
06-07-2005 5:57 PM


Re: I the Lord do all these things?
Schraff writes:
Or, God, our neglectful absentee parent, appears to not exist at all when his child really thinks about the state of the world, and begins to understand how humans think.
I theorize that God knows that some of His kids need to grow on their own...such as you have, Schraff. He is not neglecting anything...He is merely allowing you to ride the bike without His crutch training wheels....if my theory is right He will make Himself evident in your life at a later date. Until then, neither of us can comment except as to our feelings for Him or our indifference to Him.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 103 by nator, posted 06-07-2005 5:57 PM nator has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024