I wonder if someone was requesting a Biblical source from someone other than Faith, and Faith stepped in and supplied the source. Then is was inferred that Faith was taking a position based on that source when she had no such intent. Of course, considering what seems to be Faiths absolute faith in the Bibles content, one might be justified in jumping to the conclussion the passage represented her position.
Yes that is what happened. I supplied the source for Buzsaw in response to a query from Crashfrog. The problem isn't that it doesn't represent my own position, it was the implication that if it does I am denying another part of the Bible. Trixie had set it up so that it was just about impossible to get out of that box, and even hard to recognize that's what was happening. And her way of characterizing the either/or certainly cast me in a pretty negative light -- I'm this person who is glad that people suffer was the implication. Again, I doubt she had any idea she was implying all this, but that is how it read to me, very crazy-making and almost impossible to answer.
{I've tracked down the message in question. It's
EvC Forum: Man raised back to life in Jesus' name.
Now I guess it's best we put it all behind us. - Adminnemooseus}
This message has been edited by Adminnemooseus, 01-09-2006 06:46 PM