Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,903 Year: 4,160/9,624 Month: 1,031/974 Week: 358/286 Day: 1/13 Hour: 1/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   General discussion of moderation procedures: The Consequtive Consecution
MangyTiger
Member (Idle past 6383 days)
Posts: 989
From: Leicester, UK
Joined: 07-30-2004


Message 194 of 302 (277773)
01-10-2006 2:35 PM
Reply to: Message 193 by arachnophilia
01-10-2006 2:08 PM


Re: bring back randman
In my best Johm McEnroe impression:
YOU CANNOT BE SERIOUS!
The problem with randman is that we appear to have seen everything he's got. He doesn't have any real arguments that he can suppport, he's just:
  • shifting the goalposts
  • playing rope-a-dope
  • playing the shell game
  • stringing people along
  • Insert description of your choice here
I agree we need creationists to discuss with but I think randman is just all played out.
However based on the recent track record of bannings permanent seems to mean a couple of months, so I don't doubt he'll be back before long.

I wish I didn't know now what I didn't know then

This message is a reply to:
 Message 193 by arachnophilia, posted 01-10-2006 2:08 PM arachnophilia has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024