Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 59 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,924 Year: 4,181/9,624 Month: 1,052/974 Week: 11/368 Day: 11/11 Hour: 0/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   anti-abortion folks still get abortions
riVeRraT
Member (Idle past 447 days)
Posts: 5788
From: NY USA
Joined: 05-09-2004


Message 162 of 301 (299366)
03-29-2006 1:48 PM
Reply to: Message 156 by macaroniandcheese
03-29-2006 8:17 AM


Re: what's the difference between a pile of dead babies and a ferarri?
The risk is yours, not mine or the life you create.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 156 by macaroniandcheese, posted 03-29-2006 8:17 AM macaroniandcheese has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 164 by macaroniandcheese, posted 03-29-2006 2:11 PM riVeRraT has not replied

riVeRraT
Member (Idle past 447 days)
Posts: 5788
From: NY USA
Joined: 05-09-2004


Message 167 of 301 (299554)
03-30-2006 8:26 AM
Reply to: Message 163 by macaroniandcheese
03-29-2006 2:08 PM


there is no life until it can survive on it's own.
You made it.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 163 by macaroniandcheese, posted 03-29-2006 2:08 PM macaroniandcheese has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 168 by macaroniandcheese, posted 03-30-2006 8:33 AM riVeRraT has replied

riVeRraT
Member (Idle past 447 days)
Posts: 5788
From: NY USA
Joined: 05-09-2004


Message 169 of 301 (299556)
03-30-2006 8:35 AM
Reply to: Message 165 by Firebird
03-29-2006 10:38 PM


Re: How could they?
If there is “life before life”, I would feel bad for disappointing a soul that wanted to be born.
I understand this concept.
If I light up a joint, and smoke it, I ain't high yet, will I be high in a few?
If a diseased limb could talk, would it ask to be amputated? Are you a vegetarian?
A deseased limb would scream to its owner for him to do something about it.
If an abortion is the same as murdering a baby, shouldn’ t the mother be prepared to risk her health to let it live?
This is where we are going to have to trust medicine. They aren't always right, but it is the best we can do. The intentions are good. If a woman is in danger of losing her life, then she should be the first priority, not the child. While some will argue that all pregnancy carry a risk, some are riskier than others.
But the health reasons may not be limited to just the mother.
It's a very tough call. My freinds daughter just had a baby with down syndrome. The doctors wanted to abort, but they said no. They aren't even really heavy believers. The baby was born with down syndrome, but it wasn't as severe as the doctors had predicted. The baby is beautiful.
MY own step child, was born premature. The doctors said to pull the plug, said he would be nothing more than a vegatable.
He's 22 now, and he the best kid I ever meet in my life. I call him the walking truth. He is handicap with hearing, speech, learning and some minor health issues. But he managed to pass a life guard test, and be a life guard. He is a great person.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 165 by Firebird, posted 03-29-2006 10:38 PM Firebird has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 191 by Firebird, posted 03-30-2006 9:04 PM riVeRraT has replied

riVeRraT
Member (Idle past 447 days)
Posts: 5788
From: NY USA
Joined: 05-09-2004


Message 170 of 301 (299557)
03-30-2006 8:36 AM
Reply to: Message 166 by nator
03-30-2006 8:23 AM


Re: have you gone?
Ok, I could be wrong, I'll check it out.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 166 by nator, posted 03-30-2006 8:23 AM nator has not replied

riVeRraT
Member (Idle past 447 days)
Posts: 5788
From: NY USA
Joined: 05-09-2004


Message 171 of 301 (299558)
03-30-2006 8:37 AM
Reply to: Message 168 by macaroniandcheese
03-30-2006 8:33 AM


Don't even bring the bible into it.
Cause we can back up into virginity again.
Be fruitful....
My views on abortion are not from the bible. I do not want to force my religious views on people.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 168 by macaroniandcheese, posted 03-30-2006 8:33 AM macaroniandcheese has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 172 by Silent H, posted 03-30-2006 10:00 AM riVeRraT has replied

riVeRraT
Member (Idle past 447 days)
Posts: 5788
From: NY USA
Joined: 05-09-2004


Message 173 of 301 (299570)
03-30-2006 10:39 AM
Reply to: Message 172 by Silent H
03-30-2006 10:00 AM


What do you want to impose on people?
We live in a free country, but what does that mean? Isn't it just a state of mind? Are we really free? What gives us our freedom?
It's what we think as a people that determines our freedom. We decide as a country what is right and wrong, not science, not religion, not some silly idea that as long as there is consent, then it is ok. It's our own personal subjective view that determines what we are as a people. Of course our views are based on many things, but it is our interpretation of those things.
I do not want to live in a society, or raise my kids in one where the respect of the sanctity of life, and the process that starts it is nothing more than trash and selfish feelings. We as humans are born with desires. If it's evolution, then our desires stem from our natural instincts to carry on as a race. If it's God, then it's a gift from Him. Either way, there is no respect for the whole thing when we can just rip babies from wombs as a form of birth control.
I like the taste of pot. If I could just taste it and not get high, I would. But that's not the case, if I light up, I will be getting high, and all the effects that go along with it. The same can be said about intercourse. It's just the way things are. It's a basic form of living. It's how we got here. It's how we evolved, it's how we were designed, whatever. We are forgeting were we come from when we belittle the whole process to turning the womb into a food blender. If we say it's ok, then what is next? How much more respect will we let go?
I know I am probably not expressing this as cleary as I should, but it is what it is. Having been through it, I do speak from experience. Yes it is my view, and I am entitled to it.
Maybe people should be more concerned about "keeping it in their pants" and having a society that thinks that way, than telling me what to do with my views. It's a free society, and we can choose how it works. we choose what is morally right and wrong.
Teens should be being peer pressured into staying a virgin, not losing their virginity.
Parents should be treating their kids well, and with love.
Monogamy is better than promiscuity.
These kind of things, while you make think I am forcing them on you, are things learned the hard way. If we were truely free, and could do anything we want, this world could get ugly. Should we live like cavemen?
If the goal was to have a world that followed these ideas, then VD would be decreases, unwanted pregnacies would decrease, phsycological problems would decrease. And it wouldn't cost a penny.
Abortion is a band-aid for much deeper problems, there is no denying it. Giving people an out, does not cure the problems, it only promotes it. It plays games with life.
It's funny, when I asked someone who was for abortion, and into science about living things, like ants, and other lesser life forms, there response was to have respect for all living things. But not life in the womb.
People say it isn't life until it can support itself. That is the biggest bunch of BS ever!
If I took a tropical bird, and let it go in the north pole, what would happen to it?
You might say, well normally that bird would never be there in the north pole.
Well I say normally, and baby would not try to get out of its womb, unless you interfered.
Saying it is not life is not a logical arguement, and I won't accept it.
I think I am done with this thread, I stick by my first statement about the original article, and that is turning people into hypocrites, without knowing the reasons why they did what they did, is not a logical arguement for abortion, it's a smear tatic, that's all.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 172 by Silent H, posted 03-30-2006 10:00 AM Silent H has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 174 by FliesOnly, posted 03-30-2006 11:25 AM riVeRraT has replied
 Message 175 by Silent H, posted 03-30-2006 12:10 PM riVeRraT has replied

riVeRraT
Member (Idle past 447 days)
Posts: 5788
From: NY USA
Joined: 05-09-2004


Message 176 of 301 (299603)
03-30-2006 2:31 PM
Reply to: Message 174 by FliesOnly
03-30-2006 11:25 AM


Re: But you still haven't answered
I was hoping to read your reply to his question about what punishment you and your gf should be given. I see, however, that once again you avoided the question.
I don't know if you have really been following then. Maybe read again everything I wrote?
What punishment? We didn't do anything wrong. We did what was legally allowable. It was like 15 years ago. We did it, because of the society we live in, and because it was legal, it tends to make it morally acceptable. I was about 25, and still really young, so I don't think I really knew better. But I learned quickly, because immediatly afterwards, I felt guilt, and I was origianlly for it! She was my fiancee at the time, and things were starting to get a little shakey, so I didn't want to have a kid, unless I was going to be with him/her and raise him/her. I did not want to have to deal with this woman in the future, and tie myself to her for a long time. It was all selfish reasons. The fact remains, I had sex, and she got pregnant. I feel pain from it, isn't that punishment enough? There are still times today that I cry about it.
I had to learn the hard way, becuase I did something stupid and selfish, and maybe I wasn't educated enough?
Now, in all honesty, I have lost track of your position. You oppose ALL abortions? Some abortions? What about teaching a thorough course in sex education in our Jr High and High Schools? I mean come on...you can't be against that...can you? Wouldn't that likely solve many of the "problems" you mentioned in your rant? Unwanted pregnancies, STDs, abortions, etc?
At the end of my last post, I mentioned my position.
I am against abortion as a form of birth control.
I am not against condoms, sex ed, whatever.
But if you stick it in, your taking a risk, nothing is 100%, not even birth control pills. My first one was on birth control, and she got pregnant.
so the real problem is intercourse then. isn't it?
I currently have a vasectomy now, so I would be a hypocrite if I was against all that. I am not sure God would approve of it, but I did it before I really believed in God, and I hope He will understand if I am wrong.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 174 by FliesOnly, posted 03-30-2006 11:25 AM FliesOnly has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 179 by macaroniandcheese, posted 03-30-2006 2:49 PM riVeRraT has replied

riVeRraT
Member (Idle past 447 days)
Posts: 5788
From: NY USA
Joined: 05-09-2004


Message 177 of 301 (299604)
03-30-2006 2:35 PM
Reply to: Message 175 by Silent H
03-30-2006 12:10 PM


There are certainly no factual bases for your suggestions.
That's what they taught in sex-ed. monogamy is best.
virginity clearly lessens the risk of getting VD, and totally eliminates the chance that you will get pregnant, that's factual.
The rest is there, you can pick and choose what you want to accept from my posts. This would go on forever.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 175 by Silent H, posted 03-30-2006 12:10 PM Silent H has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 178 by macaroniandcheese, posted 03-30-2006 2:46 PM riVeRraT has replied
 Message 185 by Silent H, posted 03-30-2006 4:38 PM riVeRraT has not replied

riVeRraT
Member (Idle past 447 days)
Posts: 5788
From: NY USA
Joined: 05-09-2004


Message 183 of 301 (299623)
03-30-2006 4:10 PM
Reply to: Message 178 by macaroniandcheese
03-30-2006 2:46 PM


there is absolutely no evidence that monogamy is best. lots of people around the world practice both polyandry and polygyny. there is no evidence that this has a negative effect on their cultures. there are men in cultures that still have bride-prices who will share a wife with a brother or close friend until they can each afford their own. having a wife in their culture enables them to have someone to assist them by feeding them while they work. this improves their output and their income. this is beneficial to them in spite of not being able to afford separate wives. in cultures that practice polygyny, there is often a high pregnancy mortality rate. so it is easier for a man to have enough children if he has many wives. these tend to be sheephearding peoples who need lots of people to watch the flocks. further, in these cultures, there is less feeling of ownership of the spouse and so jealousy isn't a problem. monogamy leads to jealousy which is very destructive.
Oh, maybe you should sell yourself off and live that way then.
This message has been edited by riVeRraT, 03-30-2006 04:10 PM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 178 by macaroniandcheese, posted 03-30-2006 2:46 PM macaroniandcheese has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 186 by macaroniandcheese, posted 03-30-2006 5:32 PM riVeRraT has not replied

riVeRraT
Member (Idle past 447 days)
Posts: 5788
From: NY USA
Joined: 05-09-2004


Message 184 of 301 (299624)
03-30-2006 4:15 PM
Reply to: Message 179 by macaroniandcheese
03-30-2006 2:49 PM


Re: But you still haven't answered
What punishment? We didn't do anything wrong.
that's all i'm saying. so if you didn't do anything wrong, stop telling the rest of us that we are.
This BS of taking things our of context must come to an end.
Finish the story, and find out what happen afterwards.
no, because then you shouldn't be having non-procreative sex with your wife.
huh?
the only thing that might support that is that weird verse about god killing the guy who pulled out. and that was because he sinned against his brother by not providing his brother an heir. not because he used the rhythm method.
I am not sure, but isn't there a verse that explains what sex is for in the bible?
Shows you how much I care about it biblically. It's only after learning the lessons in life that I started to understand why the bible says what it says. Which is the complete opposite from you.
Good luck with your boyfriend, he's gonna need it, j/k

This message is a reply to:
 Message 179 by macaroniandcheese, posted 03-30-2006 2:49 PM macaroniandcheese has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 188 by macaroniandcheese, posted 03-30-2006 5:37 PM riVeRraT has replied

riVeRraT
Member (Idle past 447 days)
Posts: 5788
From: NY USA
Joined: 05-09-2004


Message 190 of 301 (299680)
03-30-2006 8:06 PM
Reply to: Message 188 by macaroniandcheese
03-30-2006 5:37 PM


Re: But you still haven't answered
I never said it wasn't a beatiful awesome thing.
I think thats how all life should start, with a bang!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 188 by macaroniandcheese, posted 03-30-2006 5:37 PM macaroniandcheese has not replied

riVeRraT
Member (Idle past 447 days)
Posts: 5788
From: NY USA
Joined: 05-09-2004


Message 192 of 301 (299746)
03-31-2006 7:37 AM
Reply to: Message 191 by Firebird
03-30-2006 9:04 PM


Re: Responsibility
Wanting to keep living doesn’t relate to the issue, until there is agreement on what living means.
The fact that a fetus keeps growing, unless you disturb it, is proof positive that it has a will to survive.
The interesting thing is that you followed this statement with two examples where the medical advice was, at best, questionable! I know of others, too. Therefore I would take responsibility for such a decision, taking into account medical advice. Just “trusting medicine” is to me an irresponsible cop-out.
I only said that to be realistic. I really do not trust medicine, or the doctors. They have screwed me up too many times. But they have also saved me. It's the best we got, and we have to go with it.
See, from your own account, I could become pregnant, shop around for a doctor who agreed that a depression could result from bearing the child
depression is not life threatening, and treatable.
This is why I can see only two consistent positions - either no abortions under any circumstances at all (after all, our judgement and medical opinion could both be wrong and then it would be equivalent to murder). . .
Your confusing to ideas there. If you make an honest mistake it is not murder. The fact remains that some pregnancies pose a risk to the mother, or the baby. We do our best at trying to prevent those bad things from happening.
What your saying is that medicine has no right to get involved at all. I do not agree with that. We have brains. Whether it's from God or not, we should be using them.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 191 by Firebird, posted 03-30-2006 9:04 PM Firebird has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 193 by nator, posted 03-31-2006 8:21 AM riVeRraT has replied
 Message 194 by crashfrog, posted 03-31-2006 9:09 AM riVeRraT has replied
 Message 195 by nator, posted 03-31-2006 9:15 AM riVeRraT has replied
 Message 244 by Firebird, posted 04-02-2006 11:41 PM riVeRraT has not replied

riVeRraT
Member (Idle past 447 days)
Posts: 5788
From: NY USA
Joined: 05-09-2004


Message 197 of 301 (300040)
04-01-2006 10:56 AM
Reply to: Message 193 by nator
03-31-2006 8:21 AM


Re: Responsibility
What if you didn't make a mistake, but got pregnant anyway?
Consentual sex or non-consentual?
Oh, and by the way, if I make an "honest mistake" while driving my car and unintentionally kill someone, I can still be prosecuted for manslaughter, which is a serious crime.
Mansaulter is not murder.
Prosecutred or convicted?
If a person knowingly drives a car drunk, he is responsible for the damage he does, it is no longer an accident.
If a person knowingly has sex, then they are responsible for the life that may begin afterwards. It is not an accident.
If I caused an accident while drunk, and there was a mother and child in the car, and I killed the mother, abortion would be the equivelent of killing the child as punishment, instead of prosecuting me.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 193 by nator, posted 03-31-2006 8:21 AM nator has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 226 by nator, posted 04-02-2006 9:27 AM riVeRraT has replied

riVeRraT
Member (Idle past 447 days)
Posts: 5788
From: NY USA
Joined: 05-09-2004


Message 198 of 301 (300042)
04-01-2006 10:58 AM
Reply to: Message 194 by crashfrog
03-31-2006 9:09 AM


Re: Responsibility
Clearly physical growth is completely unrelated to any "will to survive."
You are taking things out of context again.
We are talking about the physical, not the mental.
The objective, not the subjective.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 194 by crashfrog, posted 03-31-2006 9:09 AM crashfrog has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 200 by crashfrog, posted 04-01-2006 11:14 AM riVeRraT has replied

riVeRraT
Member (Idle past 447 days)
Posts: 5788
From: NY USA
Joined: 05-09-2004


Message 199 of 301 (300044)
04-01-2006 11:14 AM
Reply to: Message 195 by nator
03-31-2006 9:15 AM


Re: Responsibility
So, do tumors that keep growing unless we disturb them have a will to survive?
That is a terrible comparison.
So fetus's are tumors now?
You guys are sick. You and brenna.
Tumor is a threat to the life of it's host. They happen by accident, not because they got banged or popped.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 195 by nator, posted 03-31-2006 9:15 AM nator has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 201 by crashfrog, posted 04-01-2006 11:15 AM riVeRraT has replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024