Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
6 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,906 Year: 4,163/9,624 Month: 1,034/974 Week: 361/286 Day: 4/13 Hour: 1/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   God is cruel
New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 100 of 301 (300856)
04-04-2006 11:55 AM
Reply to: Message 98 by Brian
04-04-2006 11:52 AM


Re: Metas
Do you take Jesus' execution and resurrection metaphorically?
Like how?, man.
I believe that they happened. I believe that Jesus was the son of god.
What parts are you setting me up for if I just say no, I don't take them metaphorically?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 98 by Brian, posted 04-04-2006 11:52 AM Brian has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 101 by Brian, posted 04-04-2006 12:00 PM New Cat's Eye has replied

New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 103 of 301 (300862)
04-04-2006 12:15 PM
Reply to: Message 101 by Brian
04-04-2006 12:00 PM


Re: Metas
I just wondering why you take Jesus' shenannigans literally, yet take Genesis metaphorically when they are both equally unsupported and implausible.
Because I don't find them equally implausible.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 101 by Brian, posted 04-04-2006 12:00 PM Brian has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 106 by ramoss, posted 04-04-2006 12:57 PM New Cat's Eye has not replied
 Message 107 by Brian, posted 04-04-2006 1:01 PM New Cat's Eye has replied

New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 108 of 301 (300873)
04-04-2006 1:22 PM
Reply to: Message 107 by Brian
04-04-2006 1:01 PM


Re: Metas
Well this isn't the thread for and I don't really feel like, or have time for, a rationalization of my faith but I will quickly answer the question.
How did you come to this conclusion given that they are equally unsupported by evidence?
Lack of evidence doesn't bother me.
Evidence against can be a problem.
I think its obvious that humans did not emerge as described by Genesis. A simple lack of evidence for Jesus' divinity isn't going to end my faith.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 107 by Brian, posted 04-04-2006 1:01 PM Brian has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 109 by Brian, posted 04-04-2006 1:26 PM New Cat's Eye has replied

New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 110 of 301 (300876)
04-04-2006 1:35 PM
Reply to: Message 109 by Brian
04-04-2006 1:26 PM


Re: Metas
There's evidence against Jesus' exploits as well.
I think the evidence against Genesis is much stronger than the evidence against Jesus' exploits divinity.
With a little more faith you could believe in Genesis too?
Probably not, I can accept it as a possibility but I don't think it actually happened.
I think it is obvious that men do not die and then come back to life three days later.
But is it obvious that they never have?
Plus, if you believe in god, anything is possible. Why is Genesis not possible, you ask?, because of the strength of the evidence against it. The evidence agianst Jesus' isn't strong enough for me. Can I conceive of enough evidence to end my faith in Jesus? Yes, I can. What is it? I don't know, haven't thought about it much.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 109 by Brian, posted 04-04-2006 1:26 PM Brian has not replied

New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 114 of 301 (300907)
04-04-2006 3:05 PM
Reply to: Message 113 by Protomenace
04-04-2006 2:54 PM


The only option besides determinism, is complete randomness
I disagree with this assertion. Perhaps you could explain to me why this is true.
they don't understand the concept I'm trying to get across
well you can put me in that boat

This message is a reply to:
 Message 113 by Protomenace, posted 04-04-2006 2:54 PM Protomenace has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 115 by Protomenace, posted 04-04-2006 4:30 PM New Cat's Eye has replied

New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 116 of 301 (300935)
04-04-2006 4:38 PM
Reply to: Message 115 by Protomenace
04-04-2006 4:30 PM


You act as though people somehow choose their own personality.
I'm not acting as anything. I keep it real, wody.
Your personality does not make your decisions for you. You make the decision, consciously, your personality is just a part of you. You can't blame your choices on something else.
Do we have an infinite chain of personalities choosing other personalities???
I don't know what the hell you are typing about.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 115 by Protomenace, posted 04-04-2006 4:30 PM Protomenace has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 117 by Protomenace, posted 04-04-2006 4:43 PM New Cat's Eye has replied

New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 118 of 301 (300940)
04-04-2006 4:47 PM
Reply to: Message 117 by Protomenace
04-04-2006 4:43 PM


Did I choose to be me? No.
and that wasn't a conscious decision, nor a sin.
but some of the things you do are.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 117 by Protomenace, posted 04-04-2006 4:43 PM Protomenace has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 119 by Protomenace, posted 04-04-2006 4:53 PM New Cat's Eye has replied

New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 120 of 301 (300959)
04-04-2006 5:22 PM
Reply to: Message 119 by Protomenace
04-04-2006 4:53 PM


Let's start over.
No thanks.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 119 by Protomenace, posted 04-04-2006 4:53 PM Protomenace has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 121 by Protomenace, posted 04-04-2006 5:27 PM New Cat's Eye has replied

New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 122 of 301 (300963)
04-04-2006 5:34 PM
Reply to: Message 121 by Protomenace
04-04-2006 5:27 PM


Do not try to avoid answering my questions please.
Do or do not, there is no try.
What do you think makes up a person, and more specifically, what do you think are all of the factors on his decision making?
I don't feel like answering that question, the answer is too long and would take too much effort. I'm in the last half of my eighth hour at work today and I'm kinda tired.
Besides, this discussion isn't getting anywhere.
Why don't you make a point....
gimme something worth replying too.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 121 by Protomenace, posted 04-04-2006 5:27 PM Protomenace has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 124 by Protomenace, posted 04-04-2006 5:46 PM New Cat's Eye has replied

New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 131 of 301 (301074)
04-05-2006 9:55 AM
Reply to: Message 124 by Protomenace
04-04-2006 5:46 PM


What is this mysterious factor in decision making that is not attributed to your environment or personality that you speak of when you say "you"?
Not attributed too? I don't know. But if you don't know what "you" are, I'm gonna have a hard time explaining it.
Think about your conscience. Before you do something that is either right or wrong, your conscience tells you which one it is. You then choose to do it or not, whether or not it is right or wrong. I don't suscribe to determinism, I don't think the choice has been made for you before you assess the situation, and I think you are responsible for choice that you do end up making.
What makes you think that this is not the case?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 124 by Protomenace, posted 04-04-2006 5:46 PM Protomenace has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 134 by LinearAq, posted 04-05-2006 10:28 AM New Cat's Eye has replied

New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 140 of 301 (301110)
04-05-2006 11:47 AM
Reply to: Message 134 by LinearAq
04-05-2006 10:28 AM


Re: Conscience?
Because our limitations do not allow us to "simply believe", God will punish us for all eternity (AOG POV). Is this version of God cruel or loving?
IMO this version of god is cruel but I could be wrong.
quote:
yet He does not provide enough evidence of His existance to overcome those limitations for people who require more than unsupported assertions.
I just wanted to make a personal statement, no need to reply.
I think that God wants us to believe in him because of faith, not because of proof. If he were proved, then we'd be like robots. We are god's children and I think he prefers real children over robot children. I think god wants children who are not forced to believe in him by proof, but choose to believe in him through faith. I may be wrong, but that’s the impression that I get.
With this developed (vice inborn) sense of right and wrong, are we completely responsible for our violations of particular rules in the Bible when we were not brought up to believe that those particular rules were valid?
No, you are not completely responsible.
If we were brought up to require evidence before accepting statements as true, are we completely responsible for our disbelief of something that has scant or no evidence to support it?
No, you are not completely responsible.
Your statement about conscience appears to assume that we are somehow born with a sense of what is right and what is wrong.
Yes, I think we are born with some sense of right and wrong.
However, protomenace is saying that your environment is the very thing that develops your understanding of right and wrong (conscience).
I agree that the environment develops it but not solely. You are born with a basic moral structure onto which your environment builds. I don’t think that conscience developed strictly from social interaction. I think there is something that starts the ball rolling, so to speak, and I think intelligence comes into play, along with social interaction, to realize that the moral structure that you are born with is beneficial and should be expanded as the group sees fit.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 134 by LinearAq, posted 04-05-2006 10:28 AM LinearAq has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 161 by LinearAq, posted 04-05-2006 6:00 PM New Cat's Eye has not replied

New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 147 of 301 (301189)
04-05-2006 2:39 PM
Reply to: Message 146 by Dan Carroll
04-05-2006 1:25 PM


Re: Not to worry
Oh. So the teachings of Christ had an effect on you, and led you to your belief. You didn't just sit down and choose to believe something.
I think that was obvious from his initial statement. You are purposefully being obtuse so you can be a smart-ass. I think being a smart-ass is funny, but when you go that far out of your way to do it, it can be annoying.
If belief was your choice, you could easily believe it right now.
Unless it’s a difficult decision.
Lets say someone believes in god, for whatever reason (no choice necessary). So they research the various religions of the world and find one that they find the most truthful and most applicable to their life. Then they choose to believe in that religion. Why is it so hard for you to accept belief as a choice?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 146 by Dan Carroll, posted 04-05-2006 1:25 PM Dan Carroll has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 154 by Dan Carroll, posted 04-05-2006 3:56 PM New Cat's Eye has replied

New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 156 of 301 (301255)
04-05-2006 4:32 PM
Reply to: Message 154 by Dan Carroll
04-05-2006 3:56 PM


Re: Not to worry
Then he should come out and say it.
But that is what he did, you just decided to apply and out-of-context meaning to a word to make being a smart-ass easier.
Okay then, he should, with some difficulty, be able to believe in the butt monkeys, with all his heart.
For that matter, so should you. Give it a whirl!
Does not being able to choose to believe in butt monkeys mean that there isn't anything that I can choose to believe in?
Does being able to choose to believe in something mean that you can choose to believe in anything?
I would say no to both of these, you seem to think otherwise. care to explain?
Believing it what you think is true isn't a choice.
You thinking its true is the reason you choose to believe it. If it isn't a choice then what is it?
you missed this part:
quote:
Why is it so hard for you to accept belief as a choice?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 154 by Dan Carroll, posted 04-05-2006 3:56 PM Dan Carroll has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 160 by Dan Carroll, posted 04-05-2006 4:48 PM New Cat's Eye has replied
 Message 167 by mike the wiz, posted 04-06-2006 8:52 AM New Cat's Eye has not replied

New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 158 of 301 (301263)
04-05-2006 4:41 PM
Reply to: Message 155 by Heathen
04-05-2006 4:25 PM


I view this as pure self delusion
There are some people who realise that it could be a dilusion and then rationally conclude that it is not, and that it is in fact real. Now, it could just be a really good dilusion, but anything could be that, even the computer in front of you. So, I've come to trust myself in deciding what I determine is a delusion and what is not. I just wanted to let you know that there are people who realize the possibility of being deluded and conclude that it is not a delusion.
To believe in something, it has to present itself(or be presented) as something believable, possible, and likely. Otherwise I fear i do not have the capability to believe in it.
Thats understandable. Faith is a weird thing but it does exist and can be beneficial.
What about when you're faced with a challenge that seems unlikely for you to complete...do you just give up or do you have faith in yourself and try?
Faith can be a very stong influece on the outcome. I think faith can be very powerful and I think that you are missing out on something if you lack it.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 155 by Heathen, posted 04-05-2006 4:25 PM Heathen has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 159 by Heathen, posted 04-05-2006 4:48 PM New Cat's Eye has not replied

New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 171 of 301 (301508)
04-06-2006 11:15 AM
Reply to: Message 160 by Dan Carroll
04-05-2006 4:48 PM


Re: Not to worry
Can you envision any situation in which you would say, "Hm... religion A and religion B are mutually exclusive. If one is true, the other is false. I think religion A is true, but I'll go ahead and believe in religion B!"
What if both religions were equally plausible, couldn't you just pick one and believe in that? That would be choosing to believe in something.
You just believe what you believe.
I get what your saying and agree with you for most situations. In real world applications its true, but WRT god et al it is different.
"I can jump 10 feet high." I don't believe it and I can't just choose to believe that, me disbelieving it isn't something I choose, it just is.
But, when it comes to god, I have to say that I do choose to believe in him. There is no evidence either way and no automatic belief either way, I access the situation and conclude that I do believe in god. That conclusion is a choice, its up to me whether or not I believe.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 160 by Dan Carroll, posted 04-05-2006 4:48 PM Dan Carroll has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 174 by Dan Carroll, posted 04-06-2006 11:39 AM New Cat's Eye has replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024