Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
6 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,909 Year: 4,166/9,624 Month: 1,037/974 Week: 364/286 Day: 7/13 Hour: 2/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Oh my how things have changed!!!
riVeRraT
Member (Idle past 445 days)
Posts: 5788
From: NY USA
Joined: 05-09-2004


Message 64 of 125 (349129)
09-14-2006 6:52 PM
Reply to: Message 57 by ringo
09-14-2006 5:03 PM


So, I think on both counts riVeRraT is definitely a homophobe.
I also have a fear of heights, but I wouldn't call that a phobia either.
That's amazing, it's a phobia for me, but not for you. What's good for the goose is.....
It's often a fear that same-sex marriage will "make a mockery of the institution of marriage" - which is a very real fear.
Which has nothing to do with being afraid of homosexuals, in my point of view.
I am just as afraid of the current status of marraige, as I am of the unkown status of same sex marraige, and where this is all going to lead us. But my fear is extremely limited, and probably microscopic compared to your fear of heights, as I do put my trust in the Lord regarding both these subjects.
but it's mostly because of his own ham-fisted approach.
Bend over, and I will let you experience the "ham fisted approach" up close and personal. just kidding....
Your are right, I do come across that way, but what to you expect from a NYC kid? It's the way we talk up here, no BS, and to the point. I actually have toned down a thousand percent over the years. I am still learning.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 57 by ringo, posted 09-14-2006 5:03 PM ringo has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 66 by ringo, posted 09-14-2006 7:08 PM riVeRraT has replied
 Message 68 by nator, posted 09-14-2006 8:32 PM riVeRraT has not replied

  
riVeRraT
Member (Idle past 445 days)
Posts: 5788
From: NY USA
Joined: 05-09-2004


Message 65 of 125 (349134)
09-14-2006 7:05 PM
Reply to: Message 60 by Taz
09-14-2006 6:17 PM


is that RR still refuses to recognize that it isn't any of his bussiness, or mine, to say what's what about it or to pass judgement.
It is truely beyond me how you could have got that from anything I said. I have said just the opposite.
RR started out trying to demonize homosexuals and homosexuality with his bible thumping rants.
You need help.
The bible is clearly against homosexuality, that is clear. Why is it, if I post that fact, then I am the same exact way? I am not a literalist.
he even tried to make the argument against giving legal recognition for gay relationship on the account that they don't reproduce (should my wife and I be tarred and feathered for not having any children yet?).
A very good point to consider. But has little to do with reality, as I pointed out.
Very recently, he has admitted that he could no longer pass such judgement on the issue but would still teach his children that it's wrong. He even went as far as saying that he would not tolerate it if one of his kids is gay.
Until you start paying my bills around here, then I will continue to teach my kids those things, and why. You make it out to be something wrong, and it's not. I can raise my kids how ever I choose. Once they are on their own, then they can live however they choose. That's life.
You are starting to sound like a liberal, the kind I don't particularly like. All one sided.
but his irrational side still wants to hang onto him very tightly.
I look at the whole thing from many different angles. Each one I try to make as unbiased as possible. You have no clue about my experience with homosexuals, or to what extent I know about them, and their "life style". Of course you will immediately take that statement as being bad, discriminatory, and bigoted.
I will go ahead and admit this much. I am picking on him because even after all of this time and 6 freakin' thousand years of civilization someone like riverrat still manages to hang onto some of the darkest primal hate out there. What's worse, he's not the worst of them.
That is only an opinion, not a fact. In 6 thousand year from now, people will look at your thoughts the same way.
but is it any of my bussiness to try to legislate what goes in in someone else's bedroom?
It's not the bedroom I am concerned about. People are free to do with their bodies whatever they want.
God forbids, what if one of his children turns out to be gay?
Then I will accept him just like I do all other gays.
I will not pretend to be something I am not, just to please others. If I am wrong, I either have to be shown why, or find out for myself why. I am not absolute in any of my decisions.
And unless someone can effectively find a way to turn me gay, I will stand by the fact that you can't cure homosexuality anymore than you can cure heterosexuality.
Ask the pentagon. They have listed homosexuality as a mental disorder. Aren't there cures for disorders?
Edited by riVeRraT, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 60 by Taz, posted 09-14-2006 6:17 PM Taz has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 69 by nator, posted 09-14-2006 8:36 PM riVeRraT has not replied
 Message 70 by nator, posted 09-14-2006 8:37 PM riVeRraT has not replied
 Message 75 by Taz, posted 09-14-2006 9:41 PM riVeRraT has not replied

  
riVeRraT
Member (Idle past 445 days)
Posts: 5788
From: NY USA
Joined: 05-09-2004


Message 71 of 125 (349172)
09-14-2006 9:02 PM
Reply to: Message 66 by ringo
09-14-2006 7:08 PM


What can a gay person do to hurt you that any other human being couldn't do?
I guess that is why I am not afraid of gay people.
It was your clamation of me being homophobic that I was refering to.
I don't think that's true. Have we seen you express as much concern about marriage in general as you do about same-sex marriage?
What does you seeing me express anything have to do with how I feel about it.
Most of these gay topics are brought up by other people.
This wasn't even supposed to be a gay thread.
Now if you could learn to overcome the fear of fear itself
You want to know the truth of my fear?
My fear is that one of my narrowminded views of the world could possibly interfere with someone getting to know Jesus Christ, and experiencing the Holy Spirit.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 66 by ringo, posted 09-14-2006 7:08 PM ringo has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 76 by ringo, posted 09-14-2006 10:16 PM riVeRraT has not replied

  
riVeRraT
Member (Idle past 445 days)
Posts: 5788
From: NY USA
Joined: 05-09-2004


Message 72 of 125 (349178)
09-14-2006 9:12 PM
Reply to: Message 67 by nator
09-14-2006 8:29 PM


Re: The possible
The reason Bush and the Republicans won the last election is because many of the people who voted for them were terrified that gay people might be given equal rights to marry the person of their choice in America.
Being terrified of gay marrying, and being terrified of gay people are, to me, two different things.
If you don't see black as being white, then fear has nothing to do with it. Some people feel that gays have as much right to marry as 2 monkeys.
Doesn't mean they are afraid of it.
What are you worried about?
The subtly of the gradual.
It is wrong to teach your children to be homophobic.
If you have a gay child, they will suffer because you are prejudiced against people of a different sexual preference that you.
You do know that the suicide rate of gay teenagers is quite high, don't you?
I am not teaching them to be homophobic, I am not predjudice, and the suicide rate of all teenagers is quite high, because parents just don't care enough.
Why should we listen to the pentagon regarding psychology?
No, we should wonder, and examine why they reached that conclusion. Because if it is false, then that will only further encourage people to treat gay people differently.
If it is not false, then.....
I think we should all examine why gasby, and the rest of you have turned this into the gay thread, when it was supposed to be a funny about how men treat woman back in the day.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 67 by nator, posted 09-14-2006 8:29 PM nator has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 73 by nator, posted 09-14-2006 9:35 PM riVeRraT has replied

  
riVeRraT
Member (Idle past 445 days)
Posts: 5788
From: NY USA
Joined: 05-09-2004


Message 93 of 125 (349560)
09-16-2006 7:34 AM
Reply to: Message 73 by nator
09-14-2006 9:35 PM


Re: The possible
The attempted suicide rate for gay teens is four times higher than that of hetero teens. We don't have a good idea of the completed suicide rate because they don't ask about sexual orientation on the death certificate.
But I am not convinced that the gay suicide rate is higher, purely on the basis that they get treated differently. Most teenagers do not get treated the way they think they should, and have a hard time adjusting to growing up. Could it be that these "gay" teenagers were already screwd up more than the average teenager, and they are already at a place where they just need one more thing to go wrong?
Until we fully understand the reasons why people are gay, then we can't answer that question with any authority.
quote:If you don't see black as being white, then fear has nothing to do with it.
Thais makes no sense to me.
Ok then, I will reword it.
If I don't like the color white, but I like the color black, I do not fear white.
quote:The subtly of the gradual.
This sentence no verb.
Sorry, I have no idea what this is supposed to mean.
That things change so gradual, that we don't even notice the change. Things that lead to our demise become acceptable. Just look at TV, is the perfect example.
When I was a child, I did not see a gun on TV until I was at least 7 or 8. Now kids by the time they are 8 have seen mass murders, and blood and guts, people blowing up, everything.
What does all this do to our minds?
Isn't this all about our morals?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 73 by nator, posted 09-14-2006 9:35 PM nator has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 94 by ringo, posted 09-16-2006 12:19 PM riVeRraT has replied
 Message 95 by Taz, posted 09-16-2006 1:52 PM riVeRraT has replied
 Message 97 by nator, posted 09-18-2006 8:35 PM riVeRraT has replied
 Message 119 by Jaderis, posted 09-23-2006 4:49 AM riVeRraT has not replied

  
riVeRraT
Member (Idle past 445 days)
Posts: 5788
From: NY USA
Joined: 05-09-2004


Message 98 of 125 (350203)
09-19-2006 7:39 AM
Reply to: Message 94 by ringo
09-16-2006 12:19 PM


Re: The possible
And yet the title of the thread is "Oh my how things have changed!!!" (and in only a few short years).
Yes, and no.
It has been long enough for certain people to not remember how things were, and yet short enough in the overall scheme of time.
That is mostly due to technology, and which the speed of information travels now. Also how our lives are dependant on different things now.
Reports of "our demise" are greatly exaggerated.
Until we actually do demise, it's premature to diagnose the cause.
Good, then screw it, who gives a f#$k about global warming.
Let's remove all emissions from vehicles, and dump our raw sewage right into the ocean, what the heck, let's dump all our garbage in the ocean.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 94 by ringo, posted 09-16-2006 12:19 PM ringo has not replied

  
riVeRraT
Member (Idle past 445 days)
Posts: 5788
From: NY USA
Joined: 05-09-2004


Message 99 of 125 (350205)
09-19-2006 7:40 AM
Reply to: Message 95 by Taz
09-16-2006 1:52 PM


Re: The possible
I am still waiting for fire and brimstone to rain down on Earth after gay marriage was legalized in certain parts of the States. Heck, I'm still waiting for the earth to open up where Satan will come up to rule the Earth after interracial marriage became widely accepted by society.
Yup, still waiting...
What does that have to do with anything I said?
The BS your talking about comes from the minds of people, not God, or me. Cool it.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 95 by Taz, posted 09-16-2006 1:52 PM Taz has not replied

  
riVeRraT
Member (Idle past 445 days)
Posts: 5788
From: NY USA
Joined: 05-09-2004


Message 100 of 125 (350207)
09-19-2006 7:48 AM
Reply to: Message 97 by nator
09-18-2006 8:35 PM


Re: The possible
What do you forsee about letting adult gay people who are in love make legal marriage contracts with each other that will lead to detrimental effects to straight marriage?
Nothing. Straight marraige has already gone to the dogs, all by itself. The demise of straight marraige was the stepping stone to gay marraige.
Marraige is only what is on the surface. The actual causes are much deeper than just marraige, and relate to our morals.
But what should we do? Allow gay marraige because we need to at least have some good kind of marraige. Or is that even a reason?
What is amazing to me, is that you are still hung up on arguing about gay marraige with me, even though I have decided not to go against it.
You need to drop the subject.
There is a very easy solution to this.
Turn off the television. Or get rid of it entirely.
Nobody is forcing you to have it in your house. I don't.
I like TV, and will not get rid of it. I pay for it, so I have a say in what is on it. There are many more who won't get rid of it, and are stupid enough(or not mature enough) to actually confuse TV, with real life.
Since we live in a world now that wants to protect us from ourselves, why isn't TV more regulated? (this is a great topic)
It's the gradual at work.
No, it's about the Constitution.
It is also about the fact that you don't get to deny people's Constitutional rights because you are afraid of change.
Just amazing.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 97 by nator, posted 09-18-2006 8:35 PM nator has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 101 by nator, posted 09-19-2006 9:17 AM riVeRraT has replied

  
riVeRraT
Member (Idle past 445 days)
Posts: 5788
From: NY USA
Joined: 05-09-2004


Message 102 of 125 (350602)
09-20-2006 8:18 AM
Reply to: Message 101 by nator
09-19-2006 9:17 AM


Re: The possible
How has straight marriage "gone to the dogs"? It seems to me that marriage is still pretty popular.
You mean to tell me you couldn't gather I was talking about the divorce rate?
It's the point that constantly gets brought up whenever we talk about gay marraige in here.
What is immoral about people wanting to make the strongest legally-binding commitment to each other that they can?
I should think you would want to encourage such commitments.
Making the commitment is one thing, sticking to it is another.
We should allow gay marriage because it's none of your business if gay people want to make a secular legal contract with each other.
Every law that goes into effect in this country IS my business.
"We the People"
And, if you are right and straight people really have screwed up marriage, how does it follow that you should deny gays the right to marry because the straights can't get it right?
I am not denying anybody anything.
If you want to marry a monkey schraf, be my guest.
Now you say you like it and refuse to get rid of it.
It must not be so bad, then, eh?
There are good qualities, and bad qualities abotu it.
Because there is a great deal of money to be made by appealing to the lowest common denominator in the American population.
You got that right.
From your statement, and your decision to not watch TV, I would say you don't really agree with what is on TV either. Yet we allow it.
We allow lies, and encourage all sorts of bad behavior. Ever see the movie Jackass?
All that is ok, but if I want to build a bedroom in my basement, it is required to put in a second exit, in case of a fire. This and many other laws that cost you thousands of dollars to protect you from yourself, is all ok. But TV can show whatever it wants, practically.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 101 by nator, posted 09-19-2006 9:17 AM nator has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 103 by ringo, posted 09-20-2006 11:37 AM riVeRraT has replied
 Message 104 by Taz, posted 09-20-2006 1:45 PM riVeRraT has replied
 Message 105 by nator, posted 09-20-2006 9:40 PM riVeRraT has replied

  
riVeRraT
Member (Idle past 445 days)
Posts: 5788
From: NY USA
Joined: 05-09-2004


Message 106 of 125 (350961)
09-21-2006 9:18 AM
Reply to: Message 103 by ringo
09-20-2006 11:37 AM


Re: The possible
But can it be a same-sex monkey?
Anythig goes, just not in the church I go to, otherwise I will have to find another one.
It's on God, not on me. I have prayed to God, and asked Him to settle the situation. I have complete faith that whether gays marry or not, the situation is under control.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 103 by ringo, posted 09-20-2006 11:37 AM ringo has not replied

  
riVeRraT
Member (Idle past 445 days)
Posts: 5788
From: NY USA
Joined: 05-09-2004


Message 107 of 125 (350967)
09-21-2006 9:42 AM
Reply to: Message 104 by Taz
09-20-2006 1:45 PM


Re: The possible
Unlike you, I actually exercise my right to not watch such crap.
I admire that in you, and in schraf too. It's not a bad thing at all. I think about doing that quite often. (giving up TV altogether)
BTW, I consider simpsons crap, and I do not watch it.
But, one day in Puerto Rico, I was watching a basketball game (the knicks) and there was a commercial break that showed scenes from a movie. There was 5 kids under the age of 8 watching the game with us, and in one of the scenes, they decide to show someone get their head blown off. Full graphics. I don't find that acceptable at all.
I honestly don't understand why people nowadays like to watch those reality bullshit, especially when the show is basically about people being mean to each other.
Because it is there, and people can make money off them watching it. It doesn't matter if it a bad influence on anybody, money talks. We only protect ourselves from ourselves whenever it is convienent.
But beside the tv, you also have another option, which I have been using for the last 6 years or so. The radio seems to work fine for me. In fact, I listen to npr about half my day everyday. I have it on right now.
We don't know where your from, but here in NY, talk radio is horrible. It's worse than TV in some aspects.
What's the moral of the story, riverrat? If you don't like the movie jackass, don't watch it. If you don't like all the bullcrap on tv, watch something else or don't watch at all.
I don't but others do, and it changes them, which in fact may one day cause harm to me, or one of my kids. Just look at the attitude of kids these days, and you'll understand why.
It is beyond me just not looking, it affects me, whether I watch it or not. It affects my children whether they watch it or not.
If you don't like to see boys kissing, don't look.
I need a warning device, so I don't catch that 1/100th of a second it takes to turn away. lol'
If you don't want to recognize gay marriage, then don't
But I do.
Heck, if you think masturbation is work of the devil, then don't masturbate.
If you can not masturbate, which I tried for 5 months once, it is a good thing. There are benifits to that. But if you can't contain yourself, then better to masturbate. For the most part, I do not masturbate that often, it has grown tiresome, and my hand is like an old hag now. I desire love, and companionship with my beautiful wife.
But for the sake of your creator, don't impose your opinion on other people.
For the most part, yes. Everyone has an opinion, and it is our combined opinions that make up our society. Science does not rule our opinions, because science does not have all the answers.
I don't choose a religious view, because I actually love to sin. I see the value in all the things that Jesus was teaching us, including judging others. That's why I find it ok for gays to marry.
It says right in the Declaration of Independence that all persons are entitled to life, liberty, and pursuit of happiness.
And those rights are bestowed upon us by whom?
Liberty means not be blocked of certain rights because people like you don't like to see two boys kissing. Pursuit of happiness means be able to live a life style that makes one happy as long as it doesn't hurt you or get in your face.
I understand that. Some people do not like to see me fly my radio control planes. I guess we all have to compromise.
You do realize that the states with the most divorces are republican states, right? As a matter of fact, the top 7 or so states that have the highest divorce rates are also the states in the union that have banned gay marriage.
That is exactly what I am talking about.
How come nobody protested or demanded a law to ban straight marriage after Brit Spears got married for fun for 55 hours? How come nobody is demanding that Rush Limbaugh be tarred and feathered? Between him and his wife, they have 6 marriages and divorces, and last I heard they are going through a divorce... but that could be old news.
But this is exactly what I just said a few posts back. You cannot use the failure of straight marraige as a reason for gay marraige. There must be a word for that. Strawman maybe?
Riverrat, I think you responded there in a little bit of anger. After having read some of your previous posts, which still tell me that you are a homophobe that is afraid of being a called a homophobe and also someone that have concluded unwillingly that what you said there in reference to what was quoted doesn't make any sense. Therefore, I'm going to let this slide for now.
Listen dude, I am not a homophobe. I am not afraid of gays, or gay marraige, or what it will do to our society. When I die, I know where I am going.
I have stated many times, that I do not understand same sex attraction, or how it develops in a person. That is perfectly normal. I do find the act of gay sex disgusting, just like snot hanging from your nose. That is also perfectly normal.
I also do not appreciate being called something I am not. I have nothing to fear, as I put my trust in a higher authority. Even before I knew God the way I do now, I was not afraid of it.
I can remember times when people would attack this kid in school because he was gay, and I stood up for him. I love my gay friends, they are awesome people.
Would you like to attend the reception?
I'll be there, camcorder in hand.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 104 by Taz, posted 09-20-2006 1:45 PM Taz has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 109 by nator, posted 09-21-2006 11:01 AM riVeRraT has replied

  
riVeRraT
Member (Idle past 445 days)
Posts: 5788
From: NY USA
Joined: 05-09-2004


Message 108 of 125 (350974)
09-21-2006 9:56 AM
Reply to: Message 105 by nator
09-20-2006 9:40 PM


Re: The possible
The divorce rate is around 20% in the US. That means that four out of five marriages are intact.
Last I heard, and last we argued, it was down to 50%.
But some of those divorces are people who get more than one divorce.
quote:
3. PROJECTION/PREDICTION. This is the Census Bureau's often-cited "50%" rate, the proportion of marriages taking place right now that will eventually divorce, which has since been revised downward to roughly 43% by the National Center for Health Statistics but was moved back up to around 50% by the Census Bureau in 2002, with even more ifs ands and buts than usual. Most recently, according to the New York Times, it has been revised downward to just over 40%.
http://www.divorcereform.org/rates.html
why would you deny them to people who want them?
For the last time, I am not denying anyone, anything.
Boy your thick.
Are you saying you wish to change the US constitution to keep gays from marrying?
You need Jesus.
You noted that straights have screwed up marriage as if that was some justification for denying it to gays.
No, I pointed out that, the success rate of straight marriage has nothing to do with whether gay get married or not.
It is a strawman arguement.
There isn't much on TV that is worth the time I waste sitting on the couch.
But, why wouldn't I allow the existence of TV? It doesn't bother me.
Keep in mind schraf, and I say this to you and your husband with much love. If you guys ever decide to have kids, and you keep them from the TV, that all the kids they hang out with at school will be watching TV, and learning from it, then teaching it to your kids. So your decision to not watch TV, or let your kids watch TV, will be irrelevant. It affects all the people around you, people you have to deal with every day.
You find it ok that TV reports invalid scientific facts?
That the news, is nothing more than propaganda, and encourages bad things in our society sometimes?
That infomercials can claim whatever they want, regardless if it is true or not?
That drug companies advertise their drugs to the general public, that does not have licsense to get the drugs?
The list goes on and on.
I am not saying all TV is bad. I mostly stick to sports, news, science channel, and discovery, and history, with a few movies here and there.
But even history channel will brodcast things about the history of religion that may not be true. Things that would discourage people from seeking God. But they also brodcast things that would encourage you seeking God. So at least they are fair, provided you catch both programs.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 105 by nator, posted 09-20-2006 9:40 PM nator has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 110 by nator, posted 09-21-2006 11:37 AM riVeRraT has replied

  
riVeRraT
Member (Idle past 445 days)
Posts: 5788
From: NY USA
Joined: 05-09-2004


Message 111 of 125 (351136)
09-21-2006 5:25 PM
Reply to: Message 109 by nator
09-21-2006 11:01 AM


Re: The possible
The Simpson's is one of the best, most intelligent shows to ever be broadcast over the airwaves.
National Public Radio isn't "talk radio" as you refer to it.
I didn't refer to NPR as talk radio.
Well, then, we should abolish all religion, because it changes people and makes them believe all sorts of crazy stuff, and some of those who believe may decide they need to abuse or kill others because they don't believe the same as them.
I am kind of for that.
Such is life, rat. You cannot control everyone else's life just because you are afraid of what might happen.
But that's my point. I am not looking to control others lives, just my own. Everything that happens around me, affects me, and my children. It's called society. The Declaration does not start off by saying I the people. We are not a nation of individuals, or are we a world of individuals as much as we are one human race. Science should have showed you that. The world is a small place now. Turning your head and not looking is NOT the answer.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 109 by nator, posted 09-21-2006 11:01 AM nator has not replied

  
riVeRraT
Member (Idle past 445 days)
Posts: 5788
From: NY USA
Joined: 05-09-2004


Message 112 of 125 (351138)
09-21-2006 5:31 PM
Reply to: Message 110 by nator
09-21-2006 11:37 AM


Re: The possible
The divorce rate in the US has never exceeded 41%, and among some groups (such as college-educated women, and also people marrying over the age of 20) it is much lower.
Is that because the marraige rate is lower?
I'd rather have them play video games, honesly, and if there are DVD's appropriate for them, then they could watch those.
Watch the video games as well. Without me knowing it, my kids started playing a game that was inappropiate and soon their attitudes and tempers were rising. Even innocent fantasy fighting games like street fighter cause an aggression in the children that otherwise wouldn't be as pronounced.
Keep in mind that you cannot take the kid out of a kid, but you have to watch the levels, and the "world" seems to sneek things in there on you.
Hardly.
It's a lot like food.
Hey, I am not asking you to believe me, shit you never believe me anyway. But just keep it in mind, and have an open mind about it, should you ever have kids.
Trying to control everyone else's life is fruitless, rat. If I find that someone is behaving badly to me or mine, I will deal with it with that individual, but other than that I have no reason to meddle in anothers' life.
Which brings me back to original point, that they control certain aspects, and not others. There is no consistency, only a world driven by money.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 110 by nator, posted 09-21-2006 11:37 AM nator has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 113 by mike the wiz, posted 09-21-2006 6:07 PM riVeRraT has replied

  
riVeRraT
Member (Idle past 445 days)
Posts: 5788
From: NY USA
Joined: 05-09-2004


Message 115 of 125 (351242)
09-22-2006 7:56 AM
Reply to: Message 113 by mike the wiz
09-21-2006 6:07 PM


Re: Your babas baffles are botched
Shraff will just think that's post-hoc knowing her.
The whole dam earth is post-hoc
Perhaps you'll have to decoke your babas. Remove the baffles and if there's too much world-carbon, wash off with two-parts bible scripture, and one part church attendance.
(............forget it, Americans have never understood my sense of humour.)
But there is truth in what you say.
My kids are much more peaceful when we take away the TV from them, and read them bible verses.
But I found it funny.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 113 by mike the wiz, posted 09-21-2006 6:07 PM mike the wiz has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 116 by mike the wiz, posted 09-22-2006 9:51 AM riVeRraT has not replied
 Message 118 by Taz, posted 09-22-2006 1:24 PM riVeRraT has replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024