Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
1 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,879 Year: 4,136/9,624 Month: 1,007/974 Week: 334/286 Day: 55/40 Hour: 0/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Problems with the Big Bang theory
jar
Member (Idle past 422 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 209 of 303 (369611)
12-13-2006 6:59 PM
Reply to: Message 203 by Rob
12-13-2006 6:35 PM


Re: as usual, no reply.
So please give me a link to the top theories as to it's cause. I am well aware that the bang in big bang is for descriptive purposes only. A way for the unwashed masses to be able to grasp the deep and intriguing realities that only the elect can perceive with any clarity.
Again, you have come to the right place. We are fortunate enough to actually have some cosmologists here. Look for posts by Son Goku and cavediver. They will be more than happy to explain current thinking on origins and the BB.
It would have been better that you were ordained as a minister.
Really? So if I was ordained the relevance of what I said would change? If so, you might just want to check even further. Or even read what I write and actually think about it.
We are certainly blessed as a society to have these high priests to interpret these things for us, and at the same time assure us that there is no new birth to embrace (pure fantasy they say) so that we can see for ourselves. We cannot know... just ask you!
How silly. Please show where I said or claimed any such thing.
Again, perhaps you should not misrepresent what I say.

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

This message is a reply to:
 Message 203 by Rob, posted 12-13-2006 6:35 PM Rob has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 212 by Rob, posted 12-13-2006 7:06 PM jar has replied

Rob 
Suspended Member (Idle past 5877 days)
Posts: 2297
Joined: 06-01-2006


Message 210 of 303 (369612)
12-13-2006 7:00 PM
Reply to: Message 207 by Chiroptera
12-13-2006 6:55 PM


Re: This isn't hard.
Actually, I don't think we do need a cause
Is that a scientific process you invoke?
That's why we theists like to remind everyone that it's all faith in the greater scheme.
Unless God reveals Himself, we just don't know 'Jack'.
The good news is... He has! And everybody's welcome.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 207 by Chiroptera, posted 12-13-2006 6:55 PM Chiroptera has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 216 by Chiroptera, posted 12-13-2006 7:16 PM Rob has replied

DivineBeginning
Member (Idle past 6055 days)
Posts: 100
Joined: 11-16-2006


Message 211 of 303 (369613)
12-13-2006 7:01 PM
Reply to: Message 197 by Rob
12-13-2006 6:06 PM


Re: Guesses?
just out of curiosity... are you a born again Christian?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 197 by Rob, posted 12-13-2006 6:06 PM Rob has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 213 by Rob, posted 12-13-2006 7:07 PM DivineBeginning has not replied

Rob 
Suspended Member (Idle past 5877 days)
Posts: 2297
Joined: 06-01-2006


Message 212 of 303 (369614)
12-13-2006 7:06 PM
Reply to: Message 209 by jar
12-13-2006 6:59 PM


Re: as usual, no reply.
Again, perhaps you should not misrepresent what I say.
Kind of hard when you keep changing the meaning. Do you know what you mean?
I'm sorry brother jar, I didnt' know you were 'born again'. I didn't ever see you mention it. Even if you had, you obviously don't understand it. It's all right there in the Bible... but you knew that right?... only you didn't mean that!
This whole he said she said thing is really quite boring. Like tolerating a kid who is being defiant and manipulative.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 209 by jar, posted 12-13-2006 6:59 PM jar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 218 by jar, posted 12-13-2006 7:20 PM Rob has replied

Rob 
Suspended Member (Idle past 5877 days)
Posts: 2297
Joined: 06-01-2006


Message 213 of 303 (369615)
12-13-2006 7:07 PM
Reply to: Message 211 by DivineBeginning
12-13-2006 7:01 PM


Re: Guesses?
just out of curiosity... are you a born again Christian?
By the grace of God!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 211 by DivineBeginning, posted 12-13-2006 7:01 PM DivineBeginning has not replied

jar
Member (Idle past 422 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 214 of 303 (369616)
12-13-2006 7:08 PM
Reply to: Message 208 by DivineBeginning
12-13-2006 6:56 PM


Re: actually considering evidence
They explained that the Grand Canyon didn't take millions of years to form, but rather hundreds.
I do not doubt that you might for some reason believe that, but it is simply beyond reason unless you can provide some compelling evidence. When you find links to such material please be sure to post them here.
I lived along Turkey Run for awhile. One of my favorite places was a small pond where the stream ran over several granite boulders and spilled down a small waterfall into a pool. The stream had been running over those same boulders and spilling into the same pond for many hundreds of years. In fact the house we lived in had been built before the Revolutionary War.
There was negligible wear.

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

This message is a reply to:
 Message 208 by DivineBeginning, posted 12-13-2006 6:56 PM DivineBeginning has not replied

crashfrog
Member (Idle past 1495 days)
Posts: 19762
From: Silver Spring, MD
Joined: 03-20-2003


Message 215 of 303 (369617)
12-13-2006 7:10 PM
Reply to: Message 204 by Rob
12-13-2006 6:44 PM


Re: A delicate reply... and then back to the topic
You've done enough coke havn't you? (just kidding... speaking for my own past there).
Huh. Why are Christians so often drug addicts, I wonder? I've never known an atheist who did anything more serious than a couple of beers on a Friday night.
In fact, my favorite part of scientific discovery is the laws. Yes those glorious laws of physics.
Right. Those laws are the laws that prove the Big Bang.
You'll freak out when you meet Him.
I doubt it, somehow.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 204 by Rob, posted 12-13-2006 6:44 PM Rob has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 224 by Rob, posted 12-13-2006 7:39 PM crashfrog has replied

Chiroptera
Inactive Member


Message 216 of 303 (369619)
12-13-2006 7:16 PM
Reply to: Message 210 by Rob
12-13-2006 7:00 PM


Re: This isn't hard.
quote:
Is that a scientific process you invoke?
No. It is beyond science. Science basically describes what happens in the universe. I doubt it will ever be able to answer a question like why the universe exists.
Think about strange the question is. The "beginning of the universe" is the beginning of time itself. Before the beginning, there was no time. It is like asking what is north of the North Pole. It is a nonsense question; by definition, the North Pole is the northern most point.
In the same way, the ultimate beginning of the universe is the very first instant of time. There is no "before". So what does one mean by a "cause" for the universe? When people say "A causes B", they mean that they see A precede B in time. But nothing can precede the universe in time, because there is no time before the universe itself. Therefore, when people talk about a "cause" for the universe, I don't really know what they mean.

Never believe anything in politics until it has been officially denied. -- Otto von Bismarck

This message is a reply to:
 Message 210 by Rob, posted 12-13-2006 7:00 PM Rob has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 220 by Rob, posted 12-13-2006 7:27 PM Chiroptera has replied
 Message 255 by Fabric, posted 12-15-2006 2:16 PM Chiroptera has not replied

crashfrog
Member (Idle past 1495 days)
Posts: 19762
From: Silver Spring, MD
Joined: 03-20-2003


Message 217 of 303 (369620)
12-13-2006 7:16 PM
Reply to: Message 208 by DivineBeginning
12-13-2006 6:56 PM


Re: actually considering evidence
They explained that the Grand Canyon didn't take millions of years to form, but rather hundreds.
Well, the Grand Canyon is a mile deep, and we (that is to say, white people) discovered it in 1540, when it was as deep as it is now. If you think a river can cut a mile-deep channel in hundreds of years, why isn't the Grand Canyon twice as deep after another couple hundred years?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 208 by DivineBeginning, posted 12-13-2006 6:56 PM DivineBeginning has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 219 by DivineBeginning, posted 12-13-2006 7:21 PM crashfrog has replied

jar
Member (Idle past 422 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 218 of 303 (369622)
12-13-2006 7:20 PM
Reply to: Message 212 by Rob
12-13-2006 7:06 PM


Re: as usual, no reply.
I'm sorry brother jar, I didnt' know you were 'born again'. I didn't ever see you mention it. Even if you had, you obviously don't understand it. It's all right there in the Bible... but you knew that right?... only you didn't mean that!
LOL yet again. I did not say I was 'born again' and what the hell does that have to do with anything? In fact I said I was a "Cradle Creedal Christian".
Try reading what I say and stop misrepresenting. And the topic is "Problems with the Big Bang theory", whether someone is Christian, atheist or anything else has NOTHING to do with the BB Theory.
Please, stop with the irrelevancies.

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

This message is a reply to:
 Message 212 by Rob, posted 12-13-2006 7:06 PM Rob has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 221 by Rob, posted 12-13-2006 7:31 PM jar has replied

DivineBeginning
Member (Idle past 6055 days)
Posts: 100
Joined: 11-16-2006


Message 219 of 303 (369623)
12-13-2006 7:21 PM
Reply to: Message 217 by crashfrog
12-13-2006 7:16 PM


Re: actually considering evidence
I don't know...why don't you tell me...you're the one with all the answers here. Maybe the layers that were easily eroded have done so. Maybe the river was wider and more swift then. Maybe it happened during the flood, as there was a lot of water around then ya know.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 217 by crashfrog, posted 12-13-2006 7:16 PM crashfrog has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 222 by crashfrog, posted 12-13-2006 7:31 PM DivineBeginning has replied

Rob 
Suspended Member (Idle past 5877 days)
Posts: 2297
Joined: 06-01-2006


Message 220 of 303 (369624)
12-13-2006 7:27 PM
Reply to: Message 216 by Chiroptera
12-13-2006 7:16 PM


Re: This isn't hard.
But nothing can precede the universe in time, because there is no time before the universe itself. Therefore, when people talk about a "cause" for the universe, I don't really know what they mean.
I love the way you think... We could spend hours talking about things like this over coffee, and it would confirm for my co-workers that I am nuts. A waste of time to most folks, and irrelevant. They are probably right. I sometimes think it is just pride that causes us to engage in this way. I know that is too true for me (Crashfrog will be shocked because he is sinless).
Your thinking is very sound and very logical. It makes me glad to report that the Bible doesn't say that God (the creator) lives in time, but that He lives eternally. So you are correct. Nothing in time caused the universe. Something outside of time did. Do you find it a coincidence that the Bible could have avoided that trap?
Maybe it is simply circumstantial to you.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 216 by Chiroptera, posted 12-13-2006 7:16 PM Chiroptera has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 233 by Chiroptera, posted 12-13-2006 9:39 PM Rob has replied

Rob 
Suspended Member (Idle past 5877 days)
Posts: 2297
Joined: 06-01-2006


Message 221 of 303 (369625)
12-13-2006 7:31 PM
Reply to: Message 218 by jar
12-13-2006 7:20 PM


Re: as usual, no reply.
Please, stop with the irrelevancies.
You sir are no monkey. You are a pompous ass! A bad combination by any measure.
Since when do you presume to tell others what is relevant. There is more to life than your own opinion.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 218 by jar, posted 12-13-2006 7:20 PM jar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 223 by AdminAsgara, posted 12-13-2006 7:37 PM Rob has not replied
 Message 232 by jar, posted 12-13-2006 8:48 PM Rob has replied

crashfrog
Member (Idle past 1495 days)
Posts: 19762
From: Silver Spring, MD
Joined: 03-20-2003


Message 222 of 303 (369626)
12-13-2006 7:31 PM
Reply to: Message 219 by DivineBeginning
12-13-2006 7:21 PM


Re: actually considering evidence
I don't know...why don't you tell me...you're the one with all the answers here.
Well, ok, since you asked, here's the answer - the Grand Canyon took millions of years to erode.
That's the answer - it's impossible for it to have formed in "hundreds of years."
Maybe the layers that were easily eroded have done so.
Some of those layers are granite. You've seen granite, right? Does it seem like granite erodes easily?
We're not talking about a river making a little channel through the mud. We're talking about the Colorado river eroding a mile-deep channel through solid rock. Several different kinds of really hard solid rock.
Hundreds of years? Is that really something that seems likely to you?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 219 by DivineBeginning, posted 12-13-2006 7:21 PM DivineBeginning has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 225 by DivineBeginning, posted 12-13-2006 7:41 PM crashfrog has not replied
 Message 227 by DivineBeginning, posted 12-13-2006 7:45 PM crashfrog has not replied

AdminAsgara
Administrator (Idle past 2330 days)
Posts: 2073
From: The Universe
Joined: 10-11-2003


Message 223 of 303 (369629)
12-13-2006 7:37 PM
Reply to: Message 221 by Rob
12-13-2006 7:31 PM


Re: as usual, no reply.
I'll presume to tell you this is irrelevant. This thread is "Problems with the Big Bang theory" in the forum "Big Bang and Cosmology" in the "Science Forums" section. Theology is NOT relevant, jar's Christianity is NOT relevant and your name calling is against Forum Guidelines.
Any more of this and you will be taking a short vacation from posting here.
Please take any complaints or questions to the appropriate thread listed in my signature box.

AdminAsgara Queen of the Universe

Comments on moderation procedures (or wish to respond to admin messages)? - Go to:
  • General discussion of moderation procedures

  • Thread Reopen Requests

  • Considerations of topic promotions from the "Proposed New Topics" forum
  • New Members: to get an understanding of what makes great posts, check out:
  • "Post of the Month Forum"

  • "Columnist's Corner" Forum
  • See also Forum Guidelines, [thread=-19,-112], and [thread=-17,-45]
    http://perditionsgate.bravepages.com

    This message is a reply to:
     Message 221 by Rob, posted 12-13-2006 7:31 PM Rob has not replied

    Newer Topic | Older Topic
    Jump to:


    Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

    ™ Version 4.2
    Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024