Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,911 Year: 4,168/9,624 Month: 1,039/974 Week: 366/286 Day: 9/13 Hour: 1/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Surrendering to Jesus/God is Not Biblical
Rob 
Suspended Member (Idle past 5878 days)
Posts: 2297
Joined: 06-01-2006


Message 196 of 300 (394968)
04-14-2007 11:35 AM
Reply to: Message 195 by Phat
04-14-2007 8:37 AM


Re: POWs
Phat:
I prefer the word submit rather than the word surrender as submit implies that I am choosing my obedience rather than being dangled in life as a puppet on a string.
Yeah, I see your point. I would like to comment and then add just a small dose of personal observation about this whole canvass.
It is definitely not a Master- puppet relationship. I did not mean to suggest such. It is very rightly a Father-Son relationship.
I suppose that it really boils down to just looking up to dad and understanding that He has a few more laps around the block. And then respecting that wisdom and saying, 'ok, since I really don't know what I'm doing... I'm going to trust you'.
Those of us who come from broken homes (which is almost everyone these days) have a difficult time with that analogy. That is one reason why the family is so critical to understanding Christ.
When I gave my life to Him it was more dramatic than that, but that really was the essence of it. I held nothing back; 'No Strings... I'm yours'. I was shocked to find out He intended to teach me to walk on my own. It would be much easier if He just did it for me. And I have seen this issue raised but twisted from it's true meaning.
So it strikes me as difficult to communicate, especially with someone like Ringo... When they say it is do they are partially correct. Works are important. And Lord knows (as well as you and others here) that mine are a bit rough around the edges still. But He is changing me as I remember the goal and forget myself. And then the works come. So I am doing more and more, but only because He leads me.
Trust me when I tell you I had no power to overcome myself before Christ. Not in the applicable sense of humility and grace. I had plenty of discipline for daily life in this world. I invest and work and all of that sort of stuff. Whistle clean driving record. I vote... etc. Just a regular 'Jim-Dandy' Citizen of Rome.
But I found out I was just a Pharisee. Looking down on the failures that others were as I compared them to myself. I digress...
On the flip side, I don't think some of these folks really care what words we use or how we attempt to reach out to them. Their only intention is to discourage us. They do help the Lord to reveal what pride is left in us, so that we do not forget we are still broken and in need of grace and humility. I think that is why He continues to push me to throw myself at them. I really thought it was to evangelize. But I think I am being taught a more difficult lesson. To love them in spite of themselves. And to deny myself in spite of injustice.
They bite our hands off. But we still will reach out huh? And more patiently and honestly and lovingly each day.
And not at the expense of truth mind you. As John said, Jesus came full of grace and truth, not just grace...
The more I hear you Phat, the more I realize that you have a better balance than I in the big scheme. You are just balanced from the other angle. I lack grace... you lack truth. But you are closer to the proper position than myself and I appriciate your grace to me as I have said some awful things.
I do try with all of my heart and mind and strength. And the picture keeps growing more vast than I could ever have imagined.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 195 by Phat, posted 04-14-2007 8:37 AM Phat has not replied

anastasia
Member (Idle past 5982 days)
Posts: 1857
From: Bucks County, PA
Joined: 11-05-2006


Message 197 of 300 (395039)
04-14-2007 5:57 PM
Reply to: Message 194 by purpledawn
04-14-2007 8:34 AM


Re: Surrendering Control
PD writes:
Your comment that Jesus did not say "I will try to follow you" is what sparked my comment. If you believe the nativity stories, then Jesus was conceived for the coming purpose. IOW, he was predisposed to doing God's will and supposedly had a direct connection. It's like comparing a natural athlete to someone who has to work to reach the same goal.
Sorry if I was being rude PD. Whenever I try to bring in a little 'angst' I feel guilty. I know this is not a discussion that involves 'copping out' and that you are not a person who would do that anyway.
So...well. First, if I were to take your point here, I would have to argue whether or not Jesus was predisposed to doing God's will, and what this means. I would also question whether we as humans have a direct connection to God via the Spirit.
When Jesus prayed that 'this cup be taken from Me' was He showing a predisposition to God's will? Would you say that doing good was easier for Him, or that He was merely predisposed to try harder?
If that doesn't make sense, I am thinking about two things. One is the complete humanity of Jesus, and the other, the doctrine of His being born without original sin. Probably any discussions like this will go too broad.
I could also argue this from the opposite side. It is becuase men are not so inclined to follow God that they must 'surrender', whereas Jesus could trust in Himself more. This however I don't believe in light of His humanity.
We need self-control to be able to do what we should be doing and not do what we shouldn't be doing. So your response doesn't really answer the question of what we are giving up (surrendering) control of.
PD, this is the heart of the problem. On one hand there is spiritual terminology, on the other more psychological phrases. What the world calls 'self-control' is more or less the same virtue that surrenderists are claiming as the work of God in their lives. I would say 'we' believe that God is the origin of self-control. A paradox, he who loses himself will find himself type thing.
No one (that I have noticed) in this thread has advocated that Christians are not to follow God's will/commands.
So can we get past that and to the point of the discussion?
Message 1: It is a discussion on what is written in the Bible that does or does not support that Jesus or God requires us to give up control of our lives. Surrendering control!
I can't really get past this point because getting over the desire to do what I want is what surrendering control means to me! I am not sure what other things could be considered to be given over to God.
If you want to get sticky about the 'requirement' part of it, I would say it's not a direct command but that it follows nicely?
But is Paul addressing plain text meanings or is he combining text to create a third meaning, IOW, sermonizing? This would make an excellent new topic, since answering this question would take this topic off course.
Yes, it could be interesting, if laid out well...start with some of what Paul said regarding this and work backwards. I am willing to bet Paul does some combining, but then this is what we are sorting out as far as what combining Christians have done.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 194 by purpledawn, posted 04-14-2007 8:34 AM purpledawn has not replied

CTD
Member (Idle past 5899 days)
Posts: 253
Joined: 03-11-2007


Message 198 of 300 (395121)
04-15-2007 2:45 AM
Reply to: Message 170 by ringo
04-12-2007 1:47 PM


Ringo wrote:
We're not talking about life with or without Him. We're talking about life as a son/daughter or life as a servant. It may be that God wants servants as well as sons, but it's pretty clear (from the parable) that He doesn't want His sons to go backward and become mere servants.
I'll try to hold my tongue and let scripture speak for itself on this assertion. Wish me luck.
Rev. 1:1
The Revelation of Jesus Christ, which God gave unto him, to shew unto his servants things which must shortly come to pass; and he sent and signified it by his angel unto his servant John:
The whole book would seem to be addressed to God's servants.
Josh. 1:1
Now after the death of Moses the servant of the LORD it came to pass, that the LORD spake unto Joshua the son of Nun, Moses' minister, saying,
There are other places where Moses is called "the servant of God"; I stuck with the 1:1 pattern for simplicity.
Josh 24:29
And it came to pass after these things, that Joshua the son of Nun, the servant of the LORD, died, being an hundred and ten years old.
Joshua too? We seem to be developing a pattern here.
1 Sam. 3: 9-10
Therefore Eli said unto Samuel, Go, lie down: and it shall be, if he call thee, that thou shalt say, Speak, LORD; for thy servant heareth. So Samuel went and lay down in his place.
# [10] And the LORD came, and stood, and called as at other times, Samuel, Samuel. Then Samuel answered, Speak; for thy servant heareth.
Eli's advice differs from Ringo's unless I'm misinterpreting something.
1 Sam 23: 10-11
Then said David, O LORD God of Israel, thy servant hath certainly heard that Saul seeketh to come to Keilah, to destroy the city for my sake.
# [11] Will the men of Keilah deliver me up into his hand? will Saul come down, as thy servant hath heard? O LORD God of Israel, I beseech thee, tell thy servant. And the LORD said, He will come down.
This is getting too long. I'd better ff to the New Testament.
Matt 24: 44-51
[44] Therefore be ye also ready: for in such an hour as ye think not the Son of man cometh.
[45] Who then is a faithful and wise servant, whom his lord hath made ruler over his household, to give them meat in due season?
[46] Blessed is that servant, whom his lord when he cometh shall find so doing.
[47] Verily I say unto you, That he shall make him ruler over all his goods.
[48] But and if that evil servant shall say in his heart, My lord delayeth his coming;
[49] And shall begin to smite his fellowservants, and to eat and drink with the drunken;
[50] The lord of that servant shall come in a day when he looketh not for him, and in an hour that he is not aware of,
[51] And shall cut him asunder, and appoint him his portion with the hypocrites: there shall be weeping and gnashing of teeth.
A parable of a lord and his servants. As it is a parable, I suppose one could argue who the "lord" of this parable is, and who the "servants" are. I shan't offer my own interpretation, but leave it to each individual reader.
Luke 2: 25-32
[25] And, behold, there was a man in Jerusalem, whose name was Simeon; and the same man was just and devout, waiting for the consolation of Israel: and the Holy Ghost was upon him.
[26] And it was revealed unto him by the Holy Ghost, that he should not see death, before he had seen the Lord's Christ.
[27] And he came by the Spirit into the temple: and when the parents brought in the child Jesus, to do for him after the custom of the law,
[28] Then took he him up in his arms, and blessed God, and said,
[29] Lord, now lettest thou thy servant depart in peace, according to thy word:
[30] For mine eyes have seen thy salvation,
[31] Which thou hast prepared before the face of all people;
[32] A light to lighten the Gentiles, and the glory of thy people Israel.
Being under the direct influence of the Holy Spirit, Simeon calls himself a servant. I would suggest he surrendered to this influence, but by now it would seem to be a lost cause to argue the point.
John 15: 14-23
[14] Ye are my friends, if ye do whatsoever I command you.
[15] Henceforth I call you not servants; for the servant knoweth not what his lord doeth: but I have called you friends; for all things that I have heard of my Father I have made known unto you.
[16] Ye have not chosen me, but I have chosen you, and ordained you, that ye should go and bring forth fruit, and that your fruit should remain: that whatsoever ye shall ask of the Father in my name, he may give it you.
[17] These things I command you, that ye love one another.
[18] If the world hate you, ye know that it hated me before it hated you.
[19] If ye were of the world, the world would love his own: but because ye are not of the world, but I have chosen you out of the world, therefore the world hateth you.
[20] Remember the word that I said unto you, The servant is not greater than his lord. If they have persecuted me, they will also persecute you; if they have kept my saying, they will keep yours also.
[21] But all these things will they do unto you for my name's sake, because they know not him that sent me.
[22] If I had not come and spoken unto them, they had not had sin: but now they have no cloke for their sin.
[23] He that hateth me hateth my Father also.
Here's the best case for the assertions of both Ringo and purpledawn. The apostles are called "friends" in relation to Jesus, and specifically "not servants" because they knew what was going on.
Acts 4: 18-30
[18] And they called them, and commanded them not to speak at all nor teach in the name of Jesus.
[19] But Peter and John answered and said unto them, Whether it be right in the sight of God to hearken unto you more than unto God, judge ye.
[20] For we cannot but speak the things which we have seen and heard.
[21] So when they had further threatened them, they let them go, finding nothing how they might punish them, because of the people: for all men glorified God for that which was done.
[22] For the man was above forty years old, on whom this miracle of healing was shewed.
[23] And being let go, they went to their own company, and reported all that the chief priests and elders had said unto them.
[24] And when they heard that, they lifted up their voice to God with one accord, and said, Lord, thou art God, which hast made heaven, and earth, and the sea, and all that in them is:
[25] Who by the mouth of thy servant David hast said, Why did the heathen rage, and the people imagine vain things?
[26] The kings of the earth stood up, and the rulers were gathered together against the Lord, and against his Christ.
[27] For of a truth against thy holy child Jesus, whom thou hast anointed, both Herod, and Pontius Pilate, with the Gentiles, and the people of Israel, were gathered together,
[28] For to do whatsoever thy hand and thy counsel determined before to be done.
[29] And now, Lord, behold their threatenings: and grant unto thy servants, that with all boldness they may speak thy word,
[30] By stretching forth thine hand to heal; and that signs and wonders may be done by the name of thy holy child Jesus.
Peter and John are both the servants of God here (verse 29). Perhaps friends of Jesus still serve the Father. Or am I mistaken?
Luke 22: 24-30
[24] And there was also a strife among them, which of them should be accounted the greatest.
[25] And he said unto them, The kings of the Gentiles exercise lordship over them; and they that exercise authority upon them are called benefactors.
[26] But ye shall not be so: but he that is greatest among you, let him be as the younger; and he that is chief, as he that doth serve.
[27] For whether is greater, he that sitteth at meat, or he that serveth? is not he that sitteth at meat? but I am among you as he that serveth.
[28] Ye are they which have continued with me in my temptations.
[29] And I appoint unto you a kingdom, as my Father hath appointed unto me;
[30] That ye may eat and drink at my table in my kingdom, and sit on thrones judging the twelve tribes of Israel.
So what are we to make of Jesus' opinion of "mere servants"?
Life as a child or life as a servant? I submit this may be a false dichotomy. And I just might be a redneck...

This message is a reply to:
 Message 170 by ringo, posted 04-12-2007 1:47 PM ringo has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 199 by ringo, posted 04-15-2007 11:36 AM CTD has replied
 Message 200 by purpledawn, posted 04-15-2007 11:37 AM CTD has replied

ringo
Member (Idle past 442 days)
Posts: 20940
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005


Message 199 of 300 (395146)
04-15-2007 11:36 AM
Reply to: Message 198 by CTD
04-15-2007 2:45 AM


CTD writes:
So what are we to make of Jesus' opinion of "mere servants"?
Well, you quoted me:
quote:
It may be that God wants servants as well as sons....
and your Bible quotes all confirm what I said.
But you completely ignored the rest of what I said:
quote:
... it's pretty clear (from the parable) that He doesn't want His sons to go backward and become mere servants.
Address that point, please.
Show us where a son gets demoted to servant.
Edited by Ringo, : Rewordes for clarification.

Help scientific research in your spare time. No cost. No obligation.
Join the World Community Grid with Team EvC

This message is a reply to:
 Message 198 by CTD, posted 04-15-2007 2:45 AM CTD has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 201 by CTD, posted 04-15-2007 4:44 PM ringo has replied

purpledawn
Member (Idle past 3487 days)
Posts: 4453
From: Indiana
Joined: 04-25-2004


Message 200 of 300 (395147)
04-15-2007 11:37 AM
Reply to: Message 198 by CTD
04-15-2007 2:45 AM


Metaphorical Servant
I know that some find my way of viewing the Bible disconcerting, but to truly understand what is expected of us, I don't see how one can do otherwise.
In the age of the Bible writer's slavery is very real. Whether born into slavery, made a slave after a war, or sold into slavery. Today we (U.S.) are too far removed from the realities of slavery. We differentiate between slave and servant. As I understand it, in the Bible age there wasn't such a distinction.
Given that, we look at who is calling who a slave and what word they are using.
We have the Greek word doulos
metaph., one who gives himself up to another's will those whose service is used by Christ in extending and advancing his cause among men
If we look closely the word isn't used in reference to the general population of believers. It is like what I said in Message 86. When someone supports a presidential candidate, there is a difference between those of use who just vote and those who deal with the campaign itself. Those working in the campaign deny (lose sight of one's own interests) themselves to further their candidate.
The prodigal son parable refers more to the general population, not those called for special duties.
Everyone wasn't called to be Moses, The Twelve, or Paul.
What was expected of the average housewife or local dung dealer?
Even today everyone is not called to be a Martin Luther King or a preacher.
Again what is expected of the average housewife, farmer, or executive?
We are still dealing with being required to surrender control of ...

"Peshat is what I say and derash is what you say." --Nehama Leibowitz

This message is a reply to:
 Message 198 by CTD, posted 04-15-2007 2:45 AM CTD has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 203 by CTD, posted 04-15-2007 5:13 PM purpledawn has replied

CTD
Member (Idle past 5899 days)
Posts: 253
Joined: 03-11-2007


Message 201 of 300 (395214)
04-15-2007 4:44 PM
Reply to: Message 199 by ringo
04-15-2007 11:36 AM


Ringo writes:
and your Bible quotes all confirm what I said.
I can't dispute that, taking into account your unique interpreting skills.
Show us where a son gets demoted to servant.
I'm sure in your view, it is a demotion to become a servant of God; but there are no scriptures to support that opinion.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 199 by ringo, posted 04-15-2007 11:36 AM ringo has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 202 by ringo, posted 04-15-2007 4:59 PM CTD has replied

ringo
Member (Idle past 442 days)
Posts: 20940
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005


Message 202 of 300 (395219)
04-15-2007 4:59 PM
Reply to: Message 201 by CTD
04-15-2007 4:44 PM


CTD writes:
I'm sure in your view, it is a demotion to become a servant of God....
I think I was pretty clear: I was talking about a transition from son to servant. I don't see how anybody could see that as anything but a demotion.
If your son let you down, would you take him back as your son or would you only deign to hire him back as an employee?
I'll ask again: if you have any scripture to show that God wants us to be His servants instead of His children, please show it.

Help scientific research in your spare time. No cost. No obligation.
Join the World Community Grid with Team EvC

This message is a reply to:
 Message 201 by CTD, posted 04-15-2007 4:44 PM CTD has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 204 by CTD, posted 04-15-2007 5:27 PM ringo has replied

CTD
Member (Idle past 5899 days)
Posts: 253
Joined: 03-11-2007


Message 203 of 300 (395221)
04-15-2007 5:13 PM
Reply to: Message 200 by purpledawn
04-15-2007 11:37 AM


Re: Metaphorical Servant
purpledawn writes:
I know that some find my way of viewing the Bible disconcerting, but to truly understand what is expected of us, I don't see how one can do otherwise.
What's expected? That's the whole point. The bottom line is that God expects us to understand that we have no right to refuse Him. None. Never ever.
What does that make us? Is the word "slave" or "servant" hurtful to one's pride?
Now what I don't understand is how it can be maintained that God expects us to think we have any right to refuse Him in any way. A man might think this, but not God himself. Any disobedience whatsoever is a failing. So how could God advocate disobedience? That's what does not make any sense at all.
That nonsense is not found in the bible. The spirit of rebellion is only found in men and fallen angels, and very few of them try to say "God wants us to be disobedient".
Again what is expected of the average housewife, farmer, or executive?
Obedience.
Just for grins, would anyone care to make a case that Jonah didn't surrender and serve God, or that God didn't want him to? I gotta see this.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 200 by purpledawn, posted 04-15-2007 11:37 AM purpledawn has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 212 by purpledawn, posted 04-15-2007 9:09 PM CTD has replied

CTD
Member (Idle past 5899 days)
Posts: 253
Joined: 03-11-2007


Message 204 of 300 (395222)
04-15-2007 5:27 PM
Reply to: Message 202 by ringo
04-15-2007 4:59 PM


I think I was pretty clear: I was talking about a transition from son to servant. I don't see how anybody could see that as anything but a demotion.
If your son let you down, would you take him back as your son or would you only deign to hire him back as an employee?
I'll ask again: if you have any scripture to show that God wants us to be His servants instead of His children, please show it.
Without exception, all children of God serve Him. The transition is your own invention, and isn't found in scripture.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 202 by ringo, posted 04-15-2007 4:59 PM ringo has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 205 by ringo, posted 04-15-2007 5:36 PM CTD has replied

ringo
Member (Idle past 442 days)
Posts: 20940
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005


Message 205 of 300 (395225)
04-15-2007 5:36 PM
Reply to: Message 204 by CTD
04-15-2007 5:27 PM


CTD writes:
Without exception, all children of God serve Him.
There's a big difference between serving as a servant/slave and serving as a son/heir.
The transition is your own invention....
You're not paying attention. I've been saying throughout the entire thread that God does not want us to change from His children to His slaves. I'm the one who's saying there is no transition.

Help scientific research in your spare time. No cost. No obligation.
Join the World Community Grid with Team EvC

This message is a reply to:
 Message 204 by CTD, posted 04-15-2007 5:27 PM CTD has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 208 by CTD, posted 04-15-2007 6:55 PM ringo has replied

CTD
Member (Idle past 5899 days)
Posts: 253
Joined: 03-11-2007


Message 206 of 300 (395230)
04-15-2007 6:26 PM
Reply to: Message 175 by purpledawn
04-12-2007 3:35 PM


Re: Mushing It All Together
b_b wrote:
The bible teaches that if you could fix it yourself you would have no need for God.
purpledawn replied:
So show me where God or Jesus say that.
b_b hasn't gotten around to it; but I don't think he'll mind if I pitch in.
Rom. 5: 1-6 {mostly verses 1 and 6 for this question}
[1] Therefore being justified by faith, we have peace with God through our Lord Jesus Christ:
[2] By whom also we have access by faith into this grace wherein we stand, and rejoice in hope of the glory of God.
[3] And not only so, but we glory in tribulations also: knowing that tribulation worketh patience;
[4] And patience, experience; and experience, hope:
[5] And hope maketh not ashamed; because the love of God is shed abroad in our hearts by the Holy Ghost which is given unto us.
[6] For when we were yet without strength, in due time Christ died for the ungodly.
A simpler response would be: why did Jesus have to die? If we're capable of becoming righteous on our own, there's no way God would have put His only begotten Son through that horrible experience.
What manner of "Christians" are these here at EvC who don't know this? What manner of "Christians" don't understand what sin is, and why men need to be forgiven? Have you people started your own cult? The honest thing would be to say so, if you have. It would also be more honest not to refer to yourselves as "Christians" if you're independent of Christ, and don't intend to obey and follow Him.
Luke 24: 45-47
[45] Then opened he their understanding, that they might understand the scriptures,
[46] And said unto them, Thus it is written, and thus it behoved Christ to suffer, and to rise from the dead the third day:
[47] And that repentance and remission of sins should be preached in his name among all nations, beginning at Jerusalem.
Is this a secret?
John 6: 47-53
[47] Verily, verily, I say unto you, He that believeth on me hath everlasting life.
[48] I am that bread of life.
[49] Your fathers did eat manna in the wilderness, and are dead.
[50] This is the bread which cometh down from heaven, that a man may eat thereof, and not die.
[51] I am the living bread which came down from heaven: if any man eat of this bread, he shall live for ever: and the bread that I will give is my flesh, which I will give for the life of the world.
[52] The Jews therefore strove among themselves, saying, How can this man give us his flesh to eat?
[53] Then Jesus said unto them, Verily, verily, I say unto you, Except ye eat the flesh of the Son of man, and drink his blood, ye have no life in you.
Is this so hard to understand?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 175 by purpledawn, posted 04-12-2007 3:35 PM purpledawn has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 207 by jar, posted 04-15-2007 6:52 PM CTD has replied

jar
Member (Idle past 424 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 207 of 300 (395233)
04-15-2007 6:52 PM
Reply to: Message 206 by CTD
04-15-2007 6:26 PM


Re: Mushing It All Together
A simpler response would be: why did Jesus have to die?
Jesus had to die because he was born. Sorry, but everyone born has to die.
What manner of "Christians" are these here at EvC who don't know this?
Ones that understand that God becoming man to get killed to pay God for what God could simply forgive is really stupid and silly and just makes that God seem stupid and silly.

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

This message is a reply to:
 Message 206 by CTD, posted 04-15-2007 6:26 PM CTD has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 209 by CTD, posted 04-15-2007 7:01 PM jar has replied

CTD
Member (Idle past 5899 days)
Posts: 253
Joined: 03-11-2007


Message 208 of 300 (395234)
04-15-2007 6:55 PM
Reply to: Message 205 by ringo
04-15-2007 5:36 PM


Ringo wrote:
There's a big difference between serving as a servant/slave and serving as a son/heir.
According to Ringo there is. According to the bible there isn't.
You're not paying attention. I've been saying throughout the entire thread that God does not want us to change from His children to His slaves. I'm the one who's saying there is no transition.
You're welcome to wish me inattentive. You're whole basis for this is what you imagine happened after the return of the prodigal son. We only know there was a party. The story ends before we find out whether the father stole his other son's rightful inheritance in order to reward the one which returned and allow him to live a life of leisure. A more realistic expectation would be for the father to hire the boy on, and maintain his other son's inheritance. But either way, what happened later is a matter of speculation.
And you imagine Christians to be too proud to call themselves servants if they can get around it. Serving God is a privilege in our eyes. We count each opportunity as a blessing (sometimes after the work is done, to be truthful). And asserting that God Himself desires this to be the case when He says exactly the opposite! You're not going to convince any of us.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 205 by ringo, posted 04-15-2007 5:36 PM ringo has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 210 by ringo, posted 04-15-2007 7:11 PM CTD has not replied

CTD
Member (Idle past 5899 days)
Posts: 253
Joined: 03-11-2007


Message 209 of 300 (395236)
04-15-2007 7:01 PM
Reply to: Message 207 by jar
04-15-2007 6:52 PM


Re: Mushing It All Together
Thanks for the clarification. As you appear to speak for the cult, what say you guys stop calling yourselves "Christians"?
Or is deception an indispensable element of your religion?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 207 by jar, posted 04-15-2007 6:52 PM jar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 211 by jar, posted 04-15-2007 7:27 PM CTD has not replied

ringo
Member (Idle past 442 days)
Posts: 20940
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005


Message 210 of 300 (395238)
04-15-2007 7:11 PM
Reply to: Message 208 by CTD
04-15-2007 6:55 PM


CTD writes:
There's a big difference between serving as a servant/slave and serving as a son/heir.
According to Ringo there is. According to the bible there isn't.
You haven't shown that.
I'm only asking you to step away from the dogma for a moment and think. Kindly show us where the Bible says that being God's servant is "better" than being His son. Until you can do so, you haven't come to grips with the father/son relationship.
Have you asked yourself yet what you would do in the same situation? If your son let you down, would you disown him? Would you say, "I have no son"? Would you make him beg you for a job?
You're whole basis for this is what you imagine happened after the return of the prodigal son.
Not at all. I haven't said a word about what happened after. I've shown that the son planned to ask for a job only - not to ask to be taken in as a son. I have also shown that before he could do that, his father came to him and welcomed him as a son.
Your talk about the "rightful heir" is indeed speculation. The story is very plain about the father's attitude toward the son.
And you imagine Christians to be too proud to call themselves servants if they can get around it.
I don't know where you get that. I haven't said anything about pride.
The prodigal son was willing to humble himself, to beg for a job - but his father didn't want that. He only wanted his son.
You're not going to convince any of us.
I'm not trying to convince the dogmatists who are too blind to see what the Bible says. I hope that people will read for themselves and see that there is more to our relationship with God than just surrender.

Help scientific research in your spare time. No cost. No obligation.
Join the World Community Grid with Team EvC

This message is a reply to:
 Message 208 by CTD, posted 04-15-2007 6:55 PM CTD has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 213 by anastasia, posted 04-15-2007 9:19 PM ringo has replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024