Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,908 Year: 4,165/9,624 Month: 1,036/974 Week: 363/286 Day: 6/13 Hour: 1/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   On this day, let us all be proud of America
Taz
Member (Idle past 3321 days)
Posts: 5069
From: Zerus
Joined: 07-18-2006


Message 121 of 280 (495591)
01-23-2009 2:26 PM
Reply to: Message 104 by Buzsaw
01-22-2009 8:01 PM


Re: Over the years, Taz?
I should have been more clear. It's not just the candidates that are the targets of christian slanders. There was a case in the 90s where a gay man's home was burned down by some bigots. His dog died in the fire. The homophobic mayor of that town, in defense of those who burned this man's house down, said on the news that the man was doing some satanic rituals with his dog. Buz, it's not uncommon that you religious right come up with weird lies to slander people you don't like. Accusing Obama of being a muslim secret agent out to destroy America is just one example out of many.
But if you must, have you already forgotten the accusations from the religious right that Kerry and Edward were gay?
Added by edit.
I'll try to dig out the documentary about the various homophobic comments made by christians like you on the news over the years. If I find it, I'll post some of it on youtube. Been a while and my basement is getting a little chaotic.
Edited by Taz, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 104 by Buzsaw, posted 01-22-2009 8:01 PM Buzsaw has not replied

Artemis Entreri 
Suspended Member (Idle past 4258 days)
Posts: 1194
From: Northern Virginia
Joined: 07-08-2008


Message 122 of 280 (495621)
01-23-2009 5:18 PM
Reply to: Message 85 by subbie
01-21-2009 10:21 PM


Re: Black or white, How do you know?
IMO any democrat that won the party's ticket would have won this election. I dont think its such a great stride that a half-white guy raised by white people in white culture, to succeed in white american society, has succeeded. Its not being pedantic to call out the facts. In any forum here (EVC) you could not get by with saying "but its not my OP to point out the facts here, my OP is to state something based on very vague generalizations, and I want you all to debate my generalizations as if they are the same generalizations of the whole country". If that were the case the creationsts would run amok every where around here.
Creationist A: but but but science was not in my OP at all so you cannot use that data against me or you are being pedantic. I am argueing on vague generalizations of a society which is not really defined, and I want everyone else to do the same thing.
like always i think you post here for comedic value, because taking your double standards seriously is impossible for me. no one ever gets it, beacuse there isn't much to get, when the premise is false.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 85 by subbie, posted 01-21-2009 10:21 PM subbie has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 123 by subbie, posted 01-23-2009 5:28 PM Artemis Entreri has not replied

subbie
Member (Idle past 1284 days)
Posts: 3509
Joined: 02-26-2006


Message 123 of 280 (495622)
01-23-2009 5:28 PM
Reply to: Message 122 by Artemis Entreri
01-23-2009 5:18 PM


Re: Black or white, How do you know?
quote:
IMO any democrat that won the party's ticket would have won this election.
Possibly, but irrelevant. In 1956, no Black could ever have even made it to a major party ticket, and if he had, he would have lost to Carabell the Clown. Thus, we have progressed.
quote:
I dont think its such a great stride that a half-white guy raised by white people in white culture, to succeed in white american society, has succeeded.
And you're entitled to your opinion. I strongly suspect your opinion is heavily influenced by the fact that a Dimwitcrat won, and if it had been Clarence "Uncle" Thomas you'd be singing a different tune, but that's just me.
quote:
like always i think you post here for comedic value, because taking your double standards seriously is impossible for me.
Fortunately for me, as always, I couldn't care less what you take seriously or what you consider a double standard, particularly since you can't be bothered to say exactly what double standard you are referring to.

For we know that our patchwork heritage is a strength, not a weakness. We are a nation of Christians and Muslims, Jews and Hindus -- and non-believers. -- Barack Obama
We see monsters where science shows us windmills. -- Phat

This message is a reply to:
 Message 122 by Artemis Entreri, posted 01-23-2009 5:18 PM Artemis Entreri has not replied

New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 124 of 280 (495625)
01-23-2009 5:33 PM
Reply to: Message 67 by Artemis Entreri
01-21-2009 4:08 PM


Ho....Ly.....Shit.
That couldn't be more spot on.
For those who think that people didn't vote for him because he's black, listen to this hilarity:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b5p3OB6roAg
or what about this retard:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P36x8rTb3jI

This message is a reply to:
 Message 67 by Artemis Entreri, posted 01-21-2009 4:08 PM Artemis Entreri has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 125 by DevilsAdvocate, posted 01-23-2009 5:57 PM New Cat's Eye has not replied
 Message 126 by Rahvin, posted 01-23-2009 7:31 PM New Cat's Eye has not replied

DevilsAdvocate
Member (Idle past 3131 days)
Posts: 1548
Joined: 06-05-2008


Message 125 of 280 (495629)
01-23-2009 5:57 PM
Reply to: Message 124 by New Cat's Eye
01-23-2009 5:33 PM


I am sure we can find stupid, racist people on both sides of the political divide. I have talked to quite a few pro-McCain people who had no clue what McCain stood for and who only voted for him because he is white.
Case in point:
BTW, I am an Independent who voted for Obama.

For me, it is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring.
Dr. Carl Sagan

This message is a reply to:
 Message 124 by New Cat's Eye, posted 01-23-2009 5:33 PM New Cat's Eye has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 129 by RAZD, posted 01-23-2009 8:50 PM DevilsAdvocate has not replied

Rahvin
Member
Posts: 4046
Joined: 07-01-2005
Member Rating: 7.6


Message 126 of 280 (495651)
01-23-2009 7:31 PM
Reply to: Message 124 by New Cat's Eye
01-23-2009 5:33 PM


Of course some people voted for Obama because of race.
You don't have to be white to be racist. There are black supremacist organizations out there (among other races).
It's no different from saying that KKK members would have voted for McCain because McCain is white.
Why is that even interesting enough to post about? I thought everyone knew that racist idiots will typically vote for racist reasons given a racially divided decision.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 124 by New Cat's Eye, posted 01-23-2009 5:33 PM New Cat's Eye has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 128 by Buzsaw, posted 01-23-2009 8:21 PM Rahvin has not replied

Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 127 of 280 (495656)
01-23-2009 7:48 PM
Reply to: Message 26 by Taz
01-20-2009 1:58 PM


Taz writes:
Of course, like every racist I've known in my life, my father doesn't admit to being a racist.
Hi Taz. If you base the alleged racist charge relative to your good parents as I've been rated here, perhaps you're dealing them a bad rap. I don't know. As I've stated I would celebrate over an Allan Keys or Clarence Thomas presidency. Would your parents have any problem with a Clarence Thomas or Allan Keyes president?
Tell you're good parents that Buzsaw is joining them in prayers for their prodical son. Be careful, son of praying parents. If their god, Jehovah, the Biblical god is real, he hears their prayers and works in manifold ways to effect their concerns.
Edited by Buzsaw, : change word

BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW.
The immeasurable present eternally extends the infinite past and infinitely consumes the eternal future.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 26 by Taz, posted 01-20-2009 1:58 PM Taz has not replied

Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 128 of 280 (495661)
01-23-2009 8:21 PM
Reply to: Message 126 by Rahvin
01-23-2009 7:31 PM


Rahvin writes:
Of course some people voted for Obama because of race.
You don't have to be white to be racist. There are black supremacist organizations out there (among other races).
1. In fact a whole lot of black racists did so. It reminds me of OJ's black jury. The only thing that mattered to the majority of black (racist) voters, including conservatives like Armstrong Williams and former Congressman, J C Watts. Colin Powell was not a conservative but he switched parties to vote black. Unlike the alleged racism of Buzsaw, the racism of these blacks is for real.
2. Speaking of the black supremacists: You mean like the church of choice for our stealth president, Obama and his family, where he hung out, their mentors, and which President Obama supported liberally with his money for 20 long years. The church in bed with black supremacists and awarded their black supremacist leader, Farrakhan the highest honors.

BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW.
The immeasurable present eternally extends the infinite past and infinitely consumes the eternal future.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 126 by Rahvin, posted 01-23-2009 7:31 PM Rahvin has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 132 by DevilsAdvocate, posted 01-23-2009 9:48 PM Buzsaw has not replied

RAZD
Member (Idle past 1435 days)
Posts: 20714
From: the other end of the sidewalk
Joined: 03-14-2004


Message 129 of 280 (495665)
01-23-2009 8:50 PM
Reply to: Message 125 by DevilsAdvocate
01-23-2009 5:57 PM


Why Barak? several good reasons.
... interesting stuff.
I am sure we can find stupid, racist people on both sides of the political divide. I have talked to quite a few pro-McCain people who had no clue what McCain stood for and who only voted for him because he is white.
Yes, it is amazing how much false information is put out in politics and how many people swallow some without even thinking about it. Interesting that most of it is so emotional.
As noted in Most people vote based on false information most people do not determine if what they are told is true. They base their choice on emotion.
We also see false issues made out of things like wearing a flag pin, and whether a junior senator has "accomplished" anything.
One thing he accomplished that to me is important is that he saw through the false information of the bush administration and voted against invading Iraq.
That level judgment, imho, is more important than making little laws about bridges in alaska, especially when we are talking about someone who will make that kind of decision. This is where I chose Barak over Hillary.
I voted for Barak in the primary here because I thought he had the judgment necessary to be president, something sorely lacking in the white house for the last 8 years.
Yes, I worried about bias and the racist intolerance seen in those videos, and still am - I remember Kennedy, saw him speak, know where I was when he was killed - but the same also applies to Hillary, not just the sexist misogynists, but the bumper-sticker mentality people and the history of clinton hating republicans. I've also lived in the south and seen first hand the thin veneer of pretend tolerance over old prejudice.
But I decided that I could not let my concerns about other people's racism color my choice.
Barak also said he would close Gitmo, an issue that is critical to regaining America's heart and soul.
Barak also said he would end the war in Iraq, an issue that is critical to the US regaining credibility in world politics.
These are issues of character and judgment that are critical to the office of president.
Then there is the issue of the economy. What we saw was the failure of the economy from the bottom up. The absolute and complete refutation of the false republican economic "theory" of trickle down economics. We've seen the Botch Administration throw more money at the top of the economy, clueless as usual, and we see that this has accomplished nothing.
Where McCain stood on all these issues was, in my opinion, on the wrong side. I've also seen him equivocate on his earlier positions, and I lost respect for him.
I've seen the election process skip over good people and pick some that are less, imho, suited for the task of president, but this time I think it worked.
I've seen the "oh poor me" criticism that it is all fakery a popularity cult and the silly comparisons (Gandhi is bad?), but what I see is a lot of recognition of the qualities of a good leader.
And this day I am proud to call Mr Obama President.
Because of Gitmo
Because of Iraq
Because of demonstrated good judgment
And because he also speaks in complete sentences.
Enjoy.

we are limited in our ability to understand
by our ability to understand
Rebel American Zen Deist
... to learn ... to think ... to live ... to laugh ...
to share.


• • • Join the effort to solve medical problems, AIDS/HIV, Cancer and more with Team EvC! (click) • • •

This message is a reply to:
 Message 125 by DevilsAdvocate, posted 01-23-2009 5:57 PM DevilsAdvocate has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 131 by Buzsaw, posted 01-23-2009 9:33 PM RAZD has replied

Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 130 of 280 (495669)
01-23-2009 9:08 PM


Be Reminded
Be reminded that way back during the primaries I warned that Obama would undermine the War On Terror. I had no idea he would blatantly and suddenly end warring with terrorists as one of his first actions as Commander In Chief of the War On Terror. Of course, my thinking was that Obama is still in bed with his religion of birth, Islam.
No surprise to me. Ye koolaid drinking lubbers of Obama, can't you connect the dots as to why Hammas and the other Jihadists supported stealth Obama.
Edited by Buzsaw, : embolden for emphasis

BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW.
The immeasurable present eternally extends the infinite past and infinitely consumes the eternal future.

Replies to this message:
 Message 133 by DrJones*, posted 01-23-2009 10:01 PM Buzsaw has not replied
 Message 137 by anglagard, posted 01-24-2009 1:27 AM Buzsaw has not replied

Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 131 of 280 (495671)
01-23-2009 9:33 PM
Reply to: Message 129 by RAZD
01-23-2009 8:50 PM


Re: Anti-Gitmo BO
RAZD writes:
Because of Gitmo
When the Gitmo terrorist's eventually are released by BO, I hope they make good neighbors if one like the one who's now Ben Laden's right hand terrorist becomes your neighbor?

BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW.
The immeasurable present eternally extends the infinite past and infinitely consumes the eternal future.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 129 by RAZD, posted 01-23-2009 8:50 PM RAZD has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 134 by RAZD, posted 01-23-2009 10:38 PM Buzsaw has not replied
 Message 135 by Taz, posted 01-24-2009 12:52 AM Buzsaw has replied
 Message 138 by monkey boy, posted 01-24-2009 2:36 AM Buzsaw has replied
 Message 139 by Shield, posted 01-24-2009 6:54 AM Buzsaw has replied

DevilsAdvocate
Member (Idle past 3131 days)
Posts: 1548
Joined: 06-05-2008


Message 132 of 280 (495675)
01-23-2009 9:48 PM
Reply to: Message 128 by Buzsaw
01-23-2009 8:21 PM


1. In fact a whole lot of black racists did so.
And a ton of white racists also voted for McCain. Your point?
It reminds me of OJ's black jury. The only thing that mattered to the majority of black (racist) voters, including conservatives like Armstrong Williams and former Congressman, J C Watts.
I think the OJ trial was a trajady of justice as well, but let's be realistic who has the longest record of racial prejudice and injustice? I would venture it would be the white population of America. Should I bring up the 100+ years that blacks couldn't even vote because of legislation by white America. And how many blacks who were tortured and lynched by all white juries, mobbs and posses? Should we bring this up as well?
Colin Powell was not a conservative but he switched parties to vote black. Unlike the alleged racism of Buzsaw, the racism of these blacks is for real.
He didn't switch parties, I would venture that he voted who he though would be a better candidate for President and leading America than McCain. Are you God that you can see into his soul and KNOW why he voted for Barak Obama. I think a 4 star general, former Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff during the Gulf War (the highest military office in the United States), National Security Advisor, and Secretary of State is above being a racist. Here are his words on the subject:
Colin Powell writes:
Because of (Obama's) ability to inspire, because of the inclusive nature of this campaign, because he is reaching out all across America, because of who he is and his rhetorical abilities - we have to take that into account - as well as his substance - he has both style and substance - he has met the standard of being a successful president, being an exceptional president.
Here is are some other reasons that influenced his decisions:
Powell writes:
I have some concerns about the direction that the party has taken in recent years. It has moved more to the right than I would like to see it. But that’s a choice the party makes.
and
Powell writes:
In the case of Mr. McCain, I found that he was a little unsure as to how to deal with the economic problems we're having.
and in reference to Sarah Palin:
Powell writes:
She's a very distinguished woman and she's to be admired, but at the same time now that we have had a chance to watch her for some seven weeks, I don’t believe she's ready to be President of the United States, which is the job of the Vice President. And so, that raised some question in my mind as to the judgment that Senator McCain made.
So are you calling Mr. Powell a liar as well as a racist?
2. Speaking of the black supremacists: You mean like the church of choice for our stealth president, Obama and his family, where he hung out, their mentors, and which President Obama supported liberally with his money for 20 long years. The church in bed with black supremacists and awarded their black supremacist leader, Farrakhan the highest honors.
This concerned me as well and was one of my concerns for voting for Obama as well. However, after much research I found out that McCain is not innocent on this issue as well i.e. close association with white supremist Richard Quinn as a political advisor during his 2000 Presidential campaign. Unfortunately sometimes we as human beings associate ourselves with people that will later down the road, bite us in the ass as in the case of both Obama and McCain. That does not mean you necessarily adopt those same views.
I don't think either McCain or Obama are racists. I have much respect for McCain, I just think that Obama was a better pick for President at this time. If McCain had not run such a negative campaign and stuck to his original maverick idealogy (and picked some one besides Sarah Palin as VP) I would have voted for him (BTW my wife did vote for McCain).
Edited by DevilsAdvocate, : No reason given.

For me, it is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring.
Dr. Carl Sagan

This message is a reply to:
 Message 128 by Buzsaw, posted 01-23-2009 8:21 PM Buzsaw has not replied

DrJones*
Member
Posts: 2290
From: Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Joined: 08-19-2004
Member Rating: 6.9


Message 133 of 280 (495678)
01-23-2009 10:01 PM
Reply to: Message 130 by Buzsaw
01-23-2009 9:08 PM


Re: Be Reminded
I had no idea he would blatantly and suddenly end warring with terrorists as one of his first actions as Commander In Chief of the War On Terror.
When has this happened Buz? Since when does closing down a detention center and stopping torture equate to ending the war on terror? Or are you just full of shit yet again?

soon I discovered that this rock thing was true
Jerry Lee Lewis was the devil
Jesus was an architect previous to his career as a prophet
All of a sudden i found myself in love with the world
And so there was only one thing I could do
Was ding a ding dang my dang along ling long - Jesus Built my Hotrod Ministry

Live every week like it's Shark Week! - Tracey Jordan
Just a monkey in a long line of kings. - Matthew Good
If "elitist" just means "not the dumbest motherfucker in the room", I'll be an elitist! - Get Your War On
*not an actual doctor

This message is a reply to:
 Message 130 by Buzsaw, posted 01-23-2009 9:08 PM Buzsaw has not replied

RAZD
Member (Idle past 1435 days)
Posts: 20714
From: the other end of the sidewalk
Joined: 03-14-2004


Message 134 of 280 (495686)
01-23-2009 10:38 PM
Reply to: Message 131 by Buzsaw
01-23-2009 9:33 PM


Re: Anti-Gitmo BO & irrational Buzz Words
Buz ol buddy, you need to let go.
When the Gitmo terrorist's eventually are released by BO, I hope they make good neighbors if one like the one who's now Ben Laden's right hand terrorist becomes your neighbor?
Those are buzzwords, Buz.
Curiously, I had a neighbor back in Michigan that was muslim, who fled from Bosnia with wife and kids, from Slobodan Miloevi and the "ethnic cleansing" hooligans. He used to be a successful lawyer, about to retire, but now he works nights in a factory, with a bad back, yet he has no complaints. He is happy to be in America because of what Clinton and the US had done. He was also the kindest man in the neighborhood, always willing to help or lend things.
I've also had neighbors that were the meanest in the neighborhood, always complaining, never helpful. Christians.
The problem Buz, is that not all the people put in Gitmo were terrorists. Many were sold for rewards because they just happened to be in the wrong place. No attempt was made to actually prove that they were terrorists. No court of law has been presented the evidence that would tell if they are terrorists - and I have to conclude that this is because the evidence does not exist.
The reason I conclude this is three-fold:
(1) the Botch misAdministration could have used the propaganda value of convicting a terrorist of terrorism to parade to the world in general and skeptical Americans in specific. Not one such case exists.
(2) they resorted to torture to try to fabricate evidence for terrorism, evidence that they would not need if they had other evidence.
(3) the Botch misAdministration had the opportunity to show a conservative dominated Supreme Court that they had sufficient cause to detain these people without trial to preserve the security of the country, and the conservative dominated Supreme Court was singularly unimpressed, and demanded that the prisoners get proper justice.
Not one of these reasons is consistent with having reason to keep these people, these human beings, caged like dogs, beaten and tortured.
So were they real bonafide bloodsucking bomb-their-mothers terrorists when they were incarcerated? The evidence says no.
Were they all fighting against the US invasions? Maybe some, perhaps to defend their homes.
Are they dangerous now? Possibly. They may also be very angry about being mistreated.
Are there some that we should be worried about? Likely, but without evidence, evidence sufficient to get a conviction in a court of law, where they get their day in court to answer to the charges that can be brought against them, that is not enough reason to subvert the principles of justice.
But notice please, that Obama is not talking about a blanket release of all the prisoners, what he is talking about is applying the rules of justice to these cases, to provide them with their day in court to answer to the charges that can be brought against them, and to find a place for them if they are convicted, and a country willing to take them if they are not convicted.
The likelihood of one becoming my neighbor is very very very slim, but if this comes to be, then I will welcome him to America, apologize for the criminal behavior of the Botch misAdministration, and express hope that he will find America to be a better experience than either Gitmo or Afghanistan\Iraq wherever he originally came from.
One thing is clear though, the Botch misAdministration has made more terrorists than the number of people kept in Gitmo, and I would worry a LOT more about those people than the ones in Gitmo.
Enjoy.

we are limited in our ability to understand
by our ability to understand
Rebel American Zen Deist
... to learn ... to think ... to live ... to laugh ...
to share.


• • • Join the effort to solve medical problems, AIDS/HIV, Cancer and more with Team EvC! (click) • • •

This message is a reply to:
 Message 131 by Buzsaw, posted 01-23-2009 9:33 PM Buzsaw has not replied

Taz
Member (Idle past 3321 days)
Posts: 5069
From: Zerus
Joined: 07-18-2006


Message 135 of 280 (495700)
01-24-2009 12:52 AM
Reply to: Message 131 by Buzsaw
01-23-2009 9:33 PM


Re: Anti-Gitmo BO
Buzsaw writes:
When the Gitmo terrorist's eventually are released by BO, I hope they make good neighbors if one like the one who's now Ben Laden's right hand terrorist becomes your neighbor?
Just shut up, sit back, and imagine this for a moment.
You've been arrested by a foreign power and shipped to a detention facility on an thousands of miles away from your homeland. You are tortured from time to time for information that you may or may not know. Every once in a while, you get a lawyer who is suppose to represent you. But the catch is the lawyer isn't permitted to see any "evidence" regarding your guilt because, so they claim, the evidence is top secret stuff. In other words, you are held in a detention facility on a foreign land indefinitely without ever being charged of any wrong doing. As far as you and the rest of the world know, you are there because some people you've never met have claimed to have proof of your guilt but such proof can never be viewed by anyone, even your lawyer.
Ask yourself this. Does it really matter what you have done in the past?
I don't care if you've slaughtered millions and eaten babies for breakfast. You deserve representation and an explanation to why you are held. Even the nazi bastards had representation, and we're talking about the most evil people to have ever walked the face of the Earth.
Nobody deserves to be held indefinitely without ever being charged of a crime or given a chance to defend himself. Heck, nobody deserves being held indefinitely without ever be told why he's being held indefinitely.
Buz, people like myself aren't that naive. Nobody wants to simply release these people. But at least give them some kind of representation. Didn't your jesus say something like treat others as you would have others treat you?
I dare you to tell me straight up that you would want to be captured by a foreign power, shipped to a foreign land thousands of miles away, and held captive indefinitely without ever knowing why you were held captive. Be a good christian and don't try to weasel out of this one.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 131 by Buzsaw, posted 01-23-2009 9:33 PM Buzsaw has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 141 by Buzsaw, posted 01-24-2009 3:03 PM Taz has replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024