Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,908 Year: 4,165/9,624 Month: 1,036/974 Week: 363/286 Day: 6/13 Hour: 1/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Faith and belief - The Almighty God revealed through his grandness
Peg
Member (Idle past 4959 days)
Posts: 2703
From: melbourne, australia
Joined: 11-22-2008


Message 31 of 224 (497768)
02-06-2009 5:12 AM
Reply to: Message 21 by Theodoric
02-04-2009 12:43 PM


Re: Prophesies? Not
Theodoric writes:
I will give you the benefit of the doubt and would like you to provide some of this prophetic wisdom from the bible. Please provide some specific prophecies.
The destruction of Jerusalem by Babylon
“Then Isaiah said to Hezekiah, ”Hear the word of the LORD of Hosts: A time is coming when everything in your palace, which your ancestors have stored up to this day, will be carried off to Babylon; nothing will beleft behind.’””Isaiah 39:5,6, prophesied in732B.C.E.
Jeremiah the prophet proclaimed: “I am going to ... bring them [the Babylonians] against this land and its inhabitants ... This whole land shall be a desolate ruin. And those nations shall serve the king of Babylon seventy years.””Jeremiah 25:9,11, prophesied in625B.C.E.
Fulfillment in 607B.C.E. (586B.C.E. according to most secular chronologies): Babylon destroyed Jerusalem after a year and a half siege. The city and temple were razed, and the Jews themselves were carried off to Babylon.
They were release in 537B.C.E. by Cyrus the Great, who conquered Babylon,
Isaiah 44:24-28 mentions Cyrus by name. It was written 200 years before cyrus was even born.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 21 by Theodoric, posted 02-04-2009 12:43 PM Theodoric has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 32 by Cedre, posted 02-06-2009 5:19 AM Peg has not replied
 Message 216 by Theodoric, posted 02-09-2009 11:47 AM Peg has not replied

Peg
Member (Idle past 4959 days)
Posts: 2703
From: melbourne, australia
Joined: 11-22-2008


Message 33 of 224 (497771)
02-06-2009 5:28 AM
Reply to: Message 22 by Rahvin
02-04-2009 1:43 PM


Ravin, its not really incredulity and the universe has every bearing on the existence of a diety
an early German astronomer of the 16th/17th centuries by the name of Johannes Kepler was himself motivated by his examination of the planetary movements to be a believer in a Creator, the more he studied the movements and structure of the planets, the stronger his faith became.
Newton was one of the greatest scientific minds and he himself believed in a creator
so, to marvel at the universe is natural...its what makes every intelligent person conclude that there is an intelligent creator behind it

This message is a reply to:
 Message 22 by Rahvin, posted 02-04-2009 1:43 PM Rahvin has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 36 by Huntard, posted 02-06-2009 5:41 AM Peg has replied
 Message 37 by Vacate, posted 02-06-2009 5:43 AM Peg has not replied
 Message 39 by kuresu, posted 02-06-2009 5:49 AM Peg has replied
 Message 41 by Granny Magda, posted 02-06-2009 5:52 AM Peg has replied
 Message 44 by DevilsAdvocate, posted 02-06-2009 5:59 AM Peg has replied

Peg
Member (Idle past 4959 days)
Posts: 2703
From: melbourne, australia
Joined: 11-22-2008


Message 38 of 224 (497778)
02-06-2009 5:46 AM
Reply to: Message 26 by kuresu
02-06-2009 4:28 AM


hi kuresu
kuresu writes:
We've had several "preachers" come through EvC. Not one has demonstrated a serious case for believing in god.
thats a very good point you make.
many people doubt the existence of God due to the inability of believers to explain convincingly their convictions.
To be convinced of the existence of a being we cannot see, our belief must be based on other things observed and on our accumulated personal experience.
There is the law of cause and effect. Reasoning on the existing “effect,” creation, makes it evident that there must be some “cause” behind it.
And what about life itself? Have you ever known life to come from any source other than existing life?
then there is the inborn sense of right and wrong in all humans, there is a universality of right and wrong conduct no matter where we live or which nation we are born into...In fact, sophisticated civilized society in our own 20th century used the law of conscience to convict legally certain Nazi war criminals at Nuremberg.
Do you know of any laws that did not require a law maker?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 26 by kuresu, posted 02-06-2009 4:28 AM kuresu has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 47 by kuresu, posted 02-06-2009 6:05 AM Peg has replied

Peg
Member (Idle past 4959 days)
Posts: 2703
From: melbourne, australia
Joined: 11-22-2008


Message 40 of 224 (497780)
02-06-2009 5:51 AM
Reply to: Message 36 by Huntard
02-06-2009 5:41 AM


im not saying that at all huntard
im saying intelligent people have concluded that there is an intelligent creator behind it

This message is a reply to:
 Message 36 by Huntard, posted 02-06-2009 5:41 AM Huntard has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 42 by Vacate, posted 02-06-2009 5:56 AM Peg has not replied

Peg
Member (Idle past 4959 days)
Posts: 2703
From: melbourne, australia
Joined: 11-22-2008


Message 43 of 224 (497783)
02-06-2009 5:59 AM
Reply to: Message 39 by kuresu
02-06-2009 5:49 AM


those scientists noted how incredibly precise the universe is
its not chaos out there...its orderly. A watch obviously has a cause or maker. A carefully designed timepiece reveals something about the cause. It reveals that it is the product of an orderly mind that has the ability to design.
Yet we are able to set our clocks by the heavenly bodies. Their regularity, also the vibrations of certain atoms on this earth, allow us to adjust our clocks to within very tiny fractions of a second. Would not this superb design in creation also indicate intelligence?
And have you ever known intelligence to exist apart from personality?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 39 by kuresu, posted 02-06-2009 5:49 AM kuresu has not replied

Peg
Member (Idle past 4959 days)
Posts: 2703
From: melbourne, australia
Joined: 11-22-2008


Message 45 of 224 (497785)
02-06-2009 6:01 AM
Reply to: Message 41 by Granny Magda
02-06-2009 5:52 AM


granny magda writes:
If you're going to call Rahvin stupid, which he is very clearly not, you could at least spell his name right when you do it. Kind of undermines your argument otherwise...
there is no argument and im not calling anyone stupid

This message is a reply to:
 Message 41 by Granny Magda, posted 02-06-2009 5:52 AM Granny Magda has not replied

Peg
Member (Idle past 4959 days)
Posts: 2703
From: melbourne, australia
Joined: 11-22-2008


Message 46 of 224 (497787)
02-06-2009 6:05 AM
Reply to: Message 44 by DevilsAdvocate
02-06-2009 5:59 AM


Devils Advocate writes:
Newton was a mystic and a closet Arian believing the trinity to be a fraud perpetrated by the Catholic Church. He also conducted many occultic studies i.e. alchamy, spiritualism (talking to spirits) and was a member of Rosicrucianism and possible a freemason. Does that fit your description of a modern day Christian?
if you and granny magda and huntard go back and look at my initial post, you'll see that i was talking about 2 intelligent men who believed in God and who studied science
this is why i said 'intelligent people conclude in an intelligent creator'
Newton is not on trial here is he?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 44 by DevilsAdvocate, posted 02-06-2009 5:59 AM DevilsAdvocate has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 48 by kuresu, posted 02-06-2009 6:12 AM Peg has replied

Peg
Member (Idle past 4959 days)
Posts: 2703
From: melbourne, australia
Joined: 11-22-2008


Message 49 of 224 (497790)
02-06-2009 6:17 AM
Reply to: Message 47 by kuresu
02-06-2009 6:05 AM


you claimed that christians cannot give an explanation of why they believe in a creator
i've just given you 3 and they are not reasonable to you
well here is a wakeup call...they are reasonable to me and probably many other people who believe.
1. life does not arise from non living matter
2. laws require a law maker
3. the law of cause of effect means something must have been the cause
Can any scientist disprove these 3 realities?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 47 by kuresu, posted 02-06-2009 6:05 AM kuresu has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 51 by kuresu, posted 02-06-2009 6:27 AM Peg has replied
 Message 67 by PaulK, posted 02-06-2009 8:07 AM Peg has replied

Peg
Member (Idle past 4959 days)
Posts: 2703
From: melbourne, australia
Joined: 11-22-2008


Message 50 of 224 (497792)
02-06-2009 6:20 AM
Reply to: Message 48 by kuresu
02-06-2009 6:12 AM


i will stand by that. Intelligent people do believe in God and hopefully its because, like Kepler and Newton, they have studied and reasoned on the world around them and the realities of that world.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 48 by kuresu, posted 02-06-2009 6:12 AM kuresu has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 52 by kuresu, posted 02-06-2009 6:28 AM Peg has not replied
 Message 54 by Vacate, posted 02-06-2009 6:34 AM Peg has replied
 Message 73 by DevilsAdvocate, posted 02-06-2009 8:35 AM Peg has replied

Peg
Member (Idle past 4959 days)
Posts: 2703
From: melbourne, australia
Joined: 11-22-2008


Message 53 of 224 (497795)
02-06-2009 6:32 AM
Reply to: Message 51 by kuresu
02-06-2009 6:27 AM


kuresu writes:
As to the arguments you find compelling, well, that's fine. You may think they are compelling, but they certainly aren't.
they are not compelling to you, fair enough...
but can you disprove any of those 3 realities???

This message is a reply to:
 Message 51 by kuresu, posted 02-06-2009 6:27 AM kuresu has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 64 by Larni, posted 02-06-2009 7:37 AM Peg has replied
 Message 93 by Rahvin, posted 02-06-2009 1:51 PM Peg has replied

Peg
Member (Idle past 4959 days)
Posts: 2703
From: melbourne, australia
Joined: 11-22-2008


Message 56 of 224 (497800)
02-06-2009 6:51 AM
Reply to: Message 54 by Vacate
02-06-2009 6:34 AM


Vacate writes:
Why then have most scientists, the ones that could be said have studied the world the most, reasoned that there is no god? At the very least one could reason that these non-believers are intelligent.
of course they are intelligent and i wasnt trying to imply that they were not, i was simply saying that intelligent people also believe in God.
Any person who believes in a creator must by necessity believe that ALL humans are intelligent.
When it comes to belief in God, there are only 3 types of people...those who do, those who dont and those who dont care.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 54 by Vacate, posted 02-06-2009 6:34 AM Vacate has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 57 by Cedre, posted 02-06-2009 6:57 AM Peg has replied
 Message 60 by Vacate, posted 02-06-2009 7:11 AM Peg has not replied
 Message 70 by Granny Magda, posted 02-06-2009 8:26 AM Peg has not replied
 Message 75 by DevilsAdvocate, posted 02-06-2009 8:39 AM Peg has not replied

Peg
Member (Idle past 4959 days)
Posts: 2703
From: melbourne, australia
Joined: 11-22-2008


Message 58 of 224 (497806)
02-06-2009 7:01 AM
Reply to: Message 57 by Cedre
02-06-2009 6:57 AM


Re: peg
Hi Cedre,
well i wouldn't call it tremendous scientific input lol
they are powerful motivators for me anyway...im sure many other believers have reasoned on them too.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 57 by Cedre, posted 02-06-2009 6:57 AM Cedre has not replied

Peg
Member (Idle past 4959 days)
Posts: 2703
From: melbourne, australia
Joined: 11-22-2008


Message 61 of 224 (497811)
02-06-2009 7:12 AM
Reply to: Message 59 by Vacate
02-06-2009 7:06 AM


Vacate writes:
Who has decided that the morality written about in the bible is correct?
the question should be, does it work? Is it beneficial?
Edited by Peg, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 59 by Vacate, posted 02-06-2009 7:06 AM Vacate has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 62 by Vacate, posted 02-06-2009 7:14 AM Peg has not replied

Peg
Member (Idle past 4959 days)
Posts: 2703
From: melbourne, australia
Joined: 11-22-2008


Message 95 of 224 (497929)
02-06-2009 5:40 PM
Reply to: Message 64 by Larni
02-06-2009 7:37 AM


because he is the cause?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 64 by Larni, posted 02-06-2009 7:37 AM Larni has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 128 by Larni, posted 02-07-2009 5:17 AM Peg has not replied
 Message 149 by Larni, posted 02-08-2009 7:44 AM Peg has not replied

Peg
Member (Idle past 4959 days)
Posts: 2703
From: melbourne, australia
Joined: 11-22-2008


Message 96 of 224 (497942)
02-06-2009 6:17 PM
Reply to: Message 67 by PaulK
02-06-2009 8:07 AM


Paul writes:
Argument 1 says that creationism is false and that life is eternal.
no, argument 1 says that life does not arise from non living matter. this is a fact and there is no way around it. It does not mean that life is eternal at all...it means what it says...that life does not originate alone. All life on this planet come's from pre existing life. This is observable in nature every day.
Paul writes:
Argument 2 makes the mistake of confusing natural laws (descriptive) with the legal system (prescriptive law).
One of the definitions of law given in Webster’s Third New International Dictionary is “the observed regularity of nature.”
Scientists today attribute the earth’s position in space primarily to the interaction of the law of gravity and the law of centrifugal force. So, there is no confusion... laws exist on paper and intangibly. Nature is regulated by these laws and laws dont just appear, they are devised.
Paul writes:
Argument 3 is simply wrong. There is no "law of cause and effect" and if there were we cannot say that it applies to the universe.
the law of cause and effect applies to everything. For every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction. This includes the universe...big bang?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 67 by PaulK, posted 02-06-2009 8:07 AM PaulK has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 98 by kuresu, posted 02-06-2009 7:07 PM Peg has not replied
 Message 100 by bluescat48, posted 02-06-2009 7:14 PM Peg has replied
 Message 122 by PaulK, posted 02-07-2009 3:36 AM Peg has replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024