To show you that the burden of proof is not upon the one disbelieving the claim.
Here, let me break it down for you, if you don;t get it after that (or pretend to), I would advise you to either learn something before you comment again, even if it is just reading comprehension or a quick "how to debate" course, or just give up here, because ther's obviously no point in trying to teach you something.
Ok, here we go:
You stated in
Message 127:
Big_Al35 writes:
If you can't prove that my name isn't .... then shouldn't you assume that I am telling the truth until such time as you have evidence that I am lying.
This measn that unless someone can without a doubt show your name isn't ..., he should take your word for it. This is not how you operate in real life, now is it? You don't go around believing people until you can prove them wrong.
To this I replied with the following in
Message 128
Huntard writes:
Although you're trying to be clever again, number three is actually wrong.
Here I tell you that you're trying to be funny again. Perhaps I misjudged, and you really don't understand the slightest thing about how the world works. I also tell you that your statement in the previous message is wrong.
Huntard writes:
Until you can prove that your name is ... or any other claim you make, why should we take your word for it?
I ask you a question. A question you haven't answered. Would you care to do so?
Huntard writes:
Until you can prove that you shouldn't send me a million dollars every minute, are you going to send me a million dollars every minute?
I use an argument ad absurdum to show you why having to disprove something before not beliving it to be true is a stupid thing to do. If you really thought you should disprove things before you can stop believing them, you should be sending me 1 million dollars every minute. Since I do not hold the position that I should disporve something before I don't belive it, your reply in
Message 129:
Big_Al35 writes:
Anway, until you can prove you shouldn't send me two million dollars every minute, I guess the balance is a cheque in my favour.
Shows that you missed the entire point of my message. Because I am not the one advocating that kind of behaviour, and in fact think it's completely stupid to act that way.
You on the other hand say this is perfectly normal, so, I await your 1 million dollar deposits, thank you very much.