Kent Hovind

There is evidence of natural causes.Please present the evidence of the creator or the method used by that critter to influence evolution.Until you present evidence equal to the evidence of natural causes you have nothing.Since there is evidence that there are natural causes but no evidence of a creator or any method used by that critter to influence evolution logic demands that until such evidence is presented that the creator or the method used by that critter be simply disregarded.Your continued posting of absolute falsehoods does not make them true.It really is that simple.

I said Natural cause.I have a puddle in my back yard, the cause is that it rained.There is evidence of natural causes.Please present the evidence of the creator or the method used by that critter to influence evolution.Until you present evidence equal to the evidence of natural causes you have nothing.Since there is evidence that there are natural causes but no evidence of a creator or any method used by that critter to influence evolution logic demands that until such evidence is presented that the creator or the method used by that critter be simply disregarded.Your continued posting of absolute falsehoods does not make them true.It really is that simple.

Utter bullshit as expected.Please provide evidence I ever referred to "MR/MRS/MS NATURE"It rained, Rain is natural. The puddle filled. That is natural.I said Natural cause.I have a puddle in my back yard, the cause is that it rained.There is evidence of natural causes.Please present the evidence of the creator or the method used by that critter to influence evolution.Until you present evidence equal to the evidence of natural causes you have nothing.Since there is evidence that there are natural causes but no evidence of a creator or any method used by that critter to influence evolution logic demands that until such evidence is presented that the creator or the method used by that critter be simply disregarded. Your continued posting of absolute falsehoods does not make them true.It really is that simple.

Good for you, but as expected, utterly irrelevant.Please provide evidence I ever referred to "MR/MRS/MS NATURE"It rained, Rain is natural. The puddle filled. That is natural.I said Natural cause.I have a puddle in my back yard, the cause is that it rained.There is evidence of natural causes.Please present the evidence of the creator or the method used by that critter to influence evolution.Until you present evidence equal to the evidence of natural causes you have nothing.Since there is evidence that there are natural causes but no evidence of a creator or any method used by that critter to influence evolution logic demands that until such evidence is presented that the creator or the method used by that critter be simply disregarded.Your continued posting of absolute falsehoods and irrelevancies does not make them true or relevant.It really is that simple.

Good for you, but as expected, utterly irrelevant.No one cares what you accept, that has NOTHING to do with truth or reality.Please provide evidence I ever referred to "MR/MRS/MS NATURE"It rained, Rain is natural. The puddle filled. That is natural.I said Natural cause.I have a puddle in my back yard, the cause is that it rained.There is evidence of natural causes.Please present the evidence of the creator or the method used by that critter to influence evolution.Until you present evidence equal to the evidence of natural causes you have nothing.Since there is evidence that there are natural causes but no evidence of a creator or any method used by that critter to influence evolution logic demands that until such evidence is presented that the creator or the method used by that critter be simply disregarded.Your continued posting of absolute falsehoods and irrelevancies does not make them true or relevant.It really is that simple.

Those are what I call "attractive rabbit holes". IAJ and DB as well as Buz and many others love creating attractive rabbit holes and once you enter you find yourself in Wonderland along with the small cakes that say "Eat Me".

Good for you, but as expected, utterly irrelevant.There is evidence of natural causes.Please present the evidence of the creator or the method used by that critter to influence evolution.Until you present evidence equal to the evidence of natural causes you have nothing.Since there is evidence that there are natural causes but no evidence of a creator or any method used by that critter to influence evolution logic demands that until such evidence is presented that the creator or the method used by that critter be simply disregarded.Your continued posting of absolute falsehoods and irrelevancies does not make them true or relevant.It really is that simple.

No, of course he was not doing science, he was making a movie to sell to the easily fooled.

Good for you, but as expected, utterly irrelevant and simply more false assertions.There is evidence of natural causes.Please present the evidence of the creator or the method used by that critter to influence evolution.Until you present evidence equal to the evidence of natural causes you have nothing.Since there is evidence that there are natural causes but no evidence of a creator or any method used by that critter to influence evolution logic demands that until such evidence is presented that the creator or the method used by that critter be simply disregarded.Your continued posting of absolute falsehoods and irrelevancies does not make them true or relevant.It really is that simple.

He did answer it. Mller was NOT doing science and was simply making a commercial film to sell to the gullible Christians.

As expected, your post is utterly irrelevant and simply more false assertions.There is evidence of natural causes.Please present the evidence of the creator or the method used by that critter to influence evolution.Until you present evidence equal to the evidence of natural causes you have nothing.Since there is evidence that there are natural causes but no evidence of a creator or any method used by that critter to influence evolution logic demands that until such evidence is presented that the creator or the method used by that critter be simply disregarded.Your continued posting of absolute falsehoods and irrelevancies does not make them true or relevant.It really is that simple.

I am a theist, a devout Christian type Theist.As expected, your post is utterly irrelevant and simply more false assertions.There is evidence of natural causes.Please present the evidence of the creator or the method used by that critter to influence evolution.Until you present evidence equal to the evidence of natural causes you have nothing.Since there is evidence that there are natural causes but no evidence of a creator or any method used by that critter to influence evolution logic demands that until such evidence is presented that the creator or the method used by that critter be simply disregarded.Your continued posting of absolute falsehoods and irrelevancies does not make them true or relevant.It really is that simple.

As expected, your post is utterly irrelevant.There is evidence of natural causes.Please present the evidence of the creator or the method used by that critter to influence evolution.Until you present evidence equal to the evidence of natural causes you have nothing.Since there is evidence that there are natural causes but no evidence of a creator or any method used by that critter to influence evolution logic demands that until such evidence is presented that the creator or the method used by that critter be simply disregarded.Your continued posting of irrelevancies does not make them true or relevant.It really is that simple.

The issue is whether or not Mller was even doing science and there the evidence is overwhelming that he was NOT doing science.First, he recorded none of the data about any of his findings, made no grid diagrams to specify locations, labeled not one single sample, took no samples, presented no samples, published no findings.Mller was simply making a movie to sell to gullible Christians.It really is that simple.

Because the wood found in the Black sea is from deep water far below where coral grows and in an oxygen low environment, not covered by coral and in shallow waters.