Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
0 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,901 Year: 4,158/9,624 Month: 1,029/974 Week: 356/286 Day: 12/65 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   What Is The Positive Evidence For Atheism?
Jon
Inactive Member


Message 15 of 301 (435622)
11-22-2007 12:51 AM
Reply to: Message 1 by Cold Foreign Object
11-21-2007 10:11 PM


Why they can't...
CFO:
We did have a topic very similar to this not too long ago (Proof for God's Non-existance?). That topic is now closed, but it does have a lot of points addressed here and there. Maybe folks would want to make sure they don't simply repeat that thread?
As for my opinion on this: The atheists will never be able to show you positive evidence for no-God. Why? Because it doesn't exist. Instead, they will use sophistry to convince you of such malarkey and impossibilities - i.e., they will begin arguing like Biblical Fundamentalist. It really does become quite sad.
Jon

In considering the Origin of Species, it is quite conceivable that a naturalist... might come to the conclusion that each species had not been independently created, but had descended, like varieties, from other species. - Charles Darwin On the Origin of Species
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ ____ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
En el mundo hay multitud de idiomas, y cada uno tiene su propio significado. - I Corintios 14:10
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ ____ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
A devout people with its back to the wall can be pushed deeper and deeper into hardening religious nativism, in the end even preferring national suicide to religious compromise. - Colin Wells Sailing from Byzantium
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ ____ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
[Philosophy] stands behind everything. It is the loom behind the fabric, the place you arrive when you trace the threads back to their source. It is where you question everything you think you know and seek every truth to be had. - Archer Opterix [msg=-11,-316,210]

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by Cold Foreign Object, posted 11-21-2007 10:11 PM Cold Foreign Object has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 20 by bluegenes, posted 11-22-2007 7:26 AM Jon has replied
 Message 135 by Cold Foreign Object, posted 11-24-2007 4:59 PM Jon has not replied

Jon
Inactive Member


Message 39 of 301 (435698)
11-22-2007 12:58 PM
Reply to: Message 20 by bluegenes
11-22-2007 7:26 AM


Re: Why they can't...
Here's an example of sad sophistry from that thread, Jon. Someone tries to use mathematics inappropriately to prove that a God who created this earth flat cannot be disproved.
Inappropriate, eh? Well, that has yet to be demonstrated, on that thread, or in this post.
Jon

This message is a reply to:
 Message 20 by bluegenes, posted 11-22-2007 7:26 AM bluegenes has not replied

Jon
Inactive Member


Message 49 of 301 (435748)
11-22-2007 3:46 PM
Reply to: Message 33 by Phat
11-22-2007 10:40 AM


Re: What came first? God or Dirt?
This whole idea of not knowing really bothers me.
Um... but if you make up your answer, you don't know it just as much as you didn't know it before you made up your answer.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 33 by Phat, posted 11-22-2007 10:40 AM Phat has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 67 by Phat, posted 11-23-2007 2:54 AM Jon has replied

Jon
Inactive Member


Message 68 of 301 (435809)
11-23-2007 3:01 AM
Reply to: Message 67 by Phat
11-23-2007 2:54 AM


Re: What came first? God or Dirt?
No other way... sorry, man. Reason and logic is all we have. You can't just make stuff up without reason. IF you make it up,l you must test it against logc... place ina dsimple
Jon

This message is a reply to:
 Message 67 by Phat, posted 11-23-2007 2:54 AM Phat has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 69 by Phat, posted 11-23-2007 3:05 AM Jon has not replied

Jon
Inactive Member


Message 162 of 301 (436461)
11-25-2007 10:37 PM
Reply to: Message 11 by crashfrog
11-21-2007 10:51 PM


Silly rabbit...
I have no positive evidence, because none can exist; instead, it's the negative evidence that supports atheism. There's nothing faith-based about that.
Argument from Ignorance

This message is a reply to:
 Message 11 by crashfrog, posted 11-21-2007 10:51 PM crashfrog has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 164 by crashfrog, posted 11-25-2007 10:43 PM Jon has replied

Jon
Inactive Member


Message 167 of 301 (436474)
11-26-2007 12:21 AM
Reply to: Message 164 by crashfrog
11-25-2007 10:43 PM


Absence of evidence is evidence of absence
that's how you know when you're out of milk.
Are you saying you never know when you're out of milk, Jon?
C'mon, I'll tell you the same thing I always tell ya, get your head out of your ass and learn to debate like an adult.
Jon

This message is a reply to:
 Message 164 by crashfrog, posted 11-25-2007 10:43 PM crashfrog has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 168 by Silent H, posted 11-26-2007 12:26 AM Jon has not replied
 Message 170 by crashfrog, posted 11-26-2007 1:07 AM Jon has not replied
 Message 197 by Dr Adequate, posted 11-26-2007 10:19 PM Jon has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024