Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,912 Year: 4,169/9,624 Month: 1,040/974 Week: 367/286 Day: 10/13 Hour: 1/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Focus on the Family Will Keep your Kid from Being Gay
Chiroptera
Inactive Member


Message 100 of 317 (234869)
08-19-2005 2:48 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by crashfrog
08-17-2005 6:03 PM


Uh-oh
If I had a very young daughter, I would take her into the shower with me to bathe her. Would that be bad?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by crashfrog, posted 08-17-2005 6:03 PM crashfrog has not replied

Chiroptera
Inactive Member


Message 193 of 317 (235272)
08-21-2005 2:34 PM
Reply to: Message 192 by nator
08-21-2005 2:28 PM


quote:
...or should be, if we are serious about maintaining a secular government.
Ah, now I see where you are confused.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 192 by nator, posted 08-21-2005 2:28 PM nator has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 194 by nator, posted 08-21-2005 2:38 PM Chiroptera has not replied

Chiroptera
Inactive Member


Message 265 of 317 (235618)
08-22-2005 3:46 PM
Reply to: Message 257 by Tal
08-22-2005 3:18 PM


Re: RTFM
quote:
ou would be 100% correct if homosexuality were a racial trait, but it isn't. It's a choice.
These do not exhaust all possibilities. Something might not be genetically determined but still not a choice. I also do not believe that sexual orientation is a simple matter of genetics, but neither do I believe that it is a choice. I certainly do not believe that my political or religious beliefs are genetically determined, but neither are these choices that I made. I certainly did not choose to be an atheist, for example.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 257 by Tal, posted 08-22-2005 3:18 PM Tal has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 267 by Tal, posted 08-22-2005 3:51 PM Chiroptera has not replied

Chiroptera
Inactive Member


Message 268 of 317 (235622)
08-22-2005 3:55 PM
Reply to: Message 263 by NosyNed
08-22-2005 3:44 PM


Re: Genetic Science
quote:
However, this is evidence that genetics is significantly involved.
Not conclusive evidence, though. If genetics were significant, then I would expect that fraternal twins would show the same statistics as the adopted siblings. Instead, in both cases we see the fraternal twins being higher (although I don't know whether this is significantly higher). In fact, it is exactly this evidence that makes me doubt that genetics is all that significant.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 263 by NosyNed, posted 08-22-2005 3:44 PM NosyNed has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 269 by AdminNosy, posted 08-22-2005 4:01 PM Chiroptera has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024