. but that is not the only game in town .
There are a thousand games in town; many we've not even thought of yet. However, of those that have been thought of, all but a general theory of evolution have been eliminated by either evidence or methodology.
Your particular favorite, the God of the Bible, has been eliminated for reasons of parsimony: He adds nothing whatsoever by way of explanation. If you want to reinsert Him you'll need to demonstrate where He does add value to the argument while simultaneously eliminating all other magical causes; i.e., Flying Spaghetti Monsters.
Where is your evidence minus the philisophical trimmings? The fossils, no; evidence for increased genetic information, no.
It is just as important, or more so, that neither of the categories you mention here (thought the second is patently false), or any other catagory ever mentioned anywhere, eliminate ToE as a possible explanation.
Your insistence of being ignorant of the evidence does not delete the evidence. The evidence of ToE is overwhelming. And that it has stood the test of time unscathed is not to be sneered at either.
Kindly
Everyone deserves a neatly dug grave. It is the timing that's in dispute.
‘—