Register | Sign In

Understanding through Discussion

EvC Forum active members: 58 (9175 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: sirs
Post Volume: Total: 917,654 Year: 4,911/9,624 Month: 259/427 Week: 5/64 Day: 1/2 Hour: 0/1

Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Author Topic:   Nature belongs to ID
Member (Idle past 925 days)
Posts: 2339
From: Socorro, New Mexico USA
Joined: 03-18-2006

Message 136 of 146 (663285)
05-22-2012 11:55 PM
Reply to: Message 131 by Vanessa
05-22-2012 6:45 PM

Re: work in progress
Vanessa writes:
I refute the current explanation because I know a better one. In the 1980s in the Far East I learned a different explanation of evolution. A compelling and clever theory that did not rely on meteor strikes or mutations as mechanisms of development.
As others here have stated, you must be able to actually tell us what this purportedly superior theory is before you can expect anyone to become an adherent.
Or in simple English words - put up or shut up, or in Missouri words "show me" that's the way it works here, that's the way it works in science, that's the way it works in grad school.
Deal with it.

Read not to contradict and confute, not to believe and take for granted, not to find talk and discourse, but to weigh and consider. - Francis Bacon

This message is a reply to:
 Message 131 by Vanessa, posted 05-22-2012 6:45 PM Vanessa has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:

Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024