Understanding through Discussion

Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 57 (9054 total)
345 online now:
dwise1, jar (2 members, 343 visitors)
Newest Member: EWolf
Post Volume: Total: 888,271 Year: 5,917/14,102 Month: 65/438 Week: 109/83 Day: 11/21 Hour: 0/0

Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Author Topic:   Nature belongs to ID
Posts: 2338
From: Socorro, New Mexico USA
Joined: 03-18-2006
Member Rating: 5.1

Message 136 of 146 (663285)
05-22-2012 11:55 PM
Reply to: Message 131 by Vanessa
05-22-2012 6:45 PM

Re: work in progress
Vanessa writes:

I refute the current explanation because I know a better one. In the 1980s in the Far East I learned a different explanation of evolution. A compelling and clever theory that did not rely on meteor strikes or mutations as mechanisms of development.

As others here have stated, you must be able to actually tell us what this purportedly superior theory is before you can expect anyone to become an adherent.

Or in simple English words - put up or shut up, or in Missouri words "show me" that's the way it works here, that's the way it works in science, that's the way it works in grad school.

Deal with it.

Read not to contradict and confute, not to believe and take for granted, not to find talk and discourse, but to weigh and consider. - Francis Bacon

This message is a reply to:
 Message 131 by Vanessa, posted 05-22-2012 6:45 PM Vanessa has not yet responded

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:

Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.0 Beta
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2021