When I was at school we had arranged work experience to give us experience in the work place. This was seen a valuable experience mixing with grown ups and seeing how work got done in the real world.
This notion of making people work for their benefit seems okay to me, but when you have big companies potentially using this labour source as opposed to paying a living wage I can appreciate the problems many will have.
If people on benefit are going to get 'encouraged' to do work to access their benefits they should be 'encouraged' to work in socially, ethically and environmentally sound endeavours: rather than being cheap shelf stackers for Tescos.
All that that will teach them is self stacking is shit.
The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53
The explain to them any scientific investigation that explains the existence of things qualifies as science and as an explanation
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 286
Does a query (thats a question Stile) that uses this physical reality, to look for an answer to its existence and properties become theoretical, considering its deductive conclusions are based against objective verifiable realities.
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 134
™ Version 4.2
(1)
