Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,886 Year: 4,143/9,624 Month: 1,014/974 Week: 341/286 Day: 62/40 Hour: 3/4


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   If God Ever Stopped Intervening In Nature....
Dr Adequate
Member (Idle past 312 days)
Posts: 16113
Joined: 07-20-2006


Message 10 of 708 (704693)
08-14-2013 3:01 AM
Reply to: Message 1 by Straggler
08-13-2013 9:13 AM


Re: If God Ever Stopped Intervening In Nature....
It's hardly a new idea. For example, the catechism of the Catholic Church has this to say about it:
With creation, God does not abandon his creatures to themselves. He not only gives them being and existence, but also, and at every moment, upholds and sustains them in being ...
Similarly Calvin in his commentary on the Epistle to the Hebrews: "All things would instantly come to nothing, were they not sustained by his power."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by Straggler, posted 08-13-2013 9:13 AM Straggler has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 11 by Straggler, posted 08-14-2013 1:01 PM Dr Adequate has not replied
 Message 13 by NoNukes, posted 08-14-2013 5:56 PM Dr Adequate has not replied

  
Dr Adequate
Member (Idle past 312 days)
Posts: 16113
Joined: 07-20-2006


Message 241 of 708 (729294)
06-07-2014 8:18 PM
Reply to: Message 240 by Dogmafood
06-07-2014 7:36 PM


Re: ‘Absolut Truth’ ‘trivial’? !?!?!
What is the first predicate?
If you are still right by the time you get to Zed then it is likely that your A was correct.
A: "I am an elephant".
B: "I am a mammal".
Z: "I am an endotherm".

This message is a reply to:
 Message 240 by Dogmafood, posted 06-07-2014 7:36 PM Dogmafood has not replied

  
Dr Adequate
Member (Idle past 312 days)
Posts: 16113
Joined: 07-20-2006


Message 242 of 708 (729295)
06-07-2014 8:20 PM
Reply to: Message 229 by faceman
06-07-2014 2:43 PM


Re: ‘Absolut Truth’ ‘trivial’? !?!?!
If truth is only objective, then we're forced to doubt the existence of the laws of logic and physics, prior to our objective perceptions of them, since we weren't always around to observe them.
Did you mean to put "objective" in that sentence? It seems to me that it would make more sense if you'd said "subjective" instead.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 229 by faceman, posted 06-07-2014 2:43 PM faceman has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 253 by faceman, posted 06-09-2014 9:52 PM Dr Adequate has not replied

  
Dr Adequate
Member (Idle past 312 days)
Posts: 16113
Joined: 07-20-2006


Message 618 of 708 (768210)
09-09-2015 10:54 AM
Reply to: Message 614 by JRTjr01
09-08-2015 12:10 AM


Re: ‘reality’ an ‘illusion’ ???????????
This is a self-contradicting statement ...
But you wrote it and NoNukes didn't.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 614 by JRTjr01, posted 09-08-2015 12:10 AM JRTjr01 has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 621 by JRTjr01, posted 09-12-2015 9:02 AM Dr Adequate has replied

  
Dr Adequate
Member (Idle past 312 days)
Posts: 16113
Joined: 07-20-2006


Message 627 of 708 (768612)
09-12-2015 12:47 PM
Reply to: Message 621 by JRTjr01
09-12-2015 9:02 AM


Re: ‘reality’ an ‘illusion’ ???????????
I simply pared it down ...
And completely changed its meaning.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 621 by JRTjr01, posted 09-12-2015 9:02 AM JRTjr01 has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024