Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,913 Year: 4,170/9,624 Month: 1,041/974 Week: 368/286 Day: 11/13 Hour: 1/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   What's wrong with this picture?
Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 5 of 172 (65158)
11-08-2003 4:25 PM
Reply to: Message 3 by Asgara
11-08-2003 3:34 PM


quote:
Other than the fact that there are no women there?
...............Nor any little children who've been waiting, growing, developing, listening for nearly nine long months for this wornderful opportunity to see and experience this life of human existence they've already been given, and who will be spared the terrible brutal death they would experience, were it not for these men....these little ones who, if they could speak would shout, HEY, IT'S NOT MOM'S BODY -- IT'S MINE WERE FUSSIN OVER HERE!!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 3 by Asgara, posted 11-08-2003 3:34 PM Asgara has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 6 by Asgara, posted 11-08-2003 4:56 PM Buzsaw has replied

Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 7 of 172 (65200)
11-08-2003 7:10 PM
Reply to: Message 6 by Asgara
11-08-2003 4:56 PM


Asgara, as I understand the bill abortion pba can be performed if mother's life is at risk but not necessarily if her health is at risk. The reasoning here is that nearly any excuse could be claimed for a mothers health to be at risk. If it meant life or death to the mother, naturally I'd have to go with the abortion, but that would be a very minute percentage of cases and I believe the bill provides for that anyhow.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 6 by Asgara, posted 11-08-2003 4:56 PM Asgara has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 8 by joshua221, posted 11-08-2003 7:56 PM Buzsaw has not replied
 Message 9 by Asgara, posted 11-08-2003 8:00 PM Buzsaw has replied

Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 14 of 172 (65214)
11-08-2003 8:17 PM
Reply to: Message 9 by Asgara
11-08-2003 8:00 PM


quote:
Since when does the federal government have the right to place bans on the safest, best care a doctor can offer a patient?
When that care involves the horrible brutal torture death of another fully developed, body, soul, brain and all human being 3/4 of a year old which that mother has brought to be.
The framers of the Constitution would agree with me here, hands down, Asgara. They framed the Constitution to protect all of humanity, including the little children, regardless of status.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 9 by Asgara, posted 11-08-2003 8:00 PM Asgara has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 54 by nator, posted 11-10-2003 8:29 AM Buzsaw has not replied

Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 15 of 172 (65216)
11-08-2003 8:21 PM
Reply to: Message 12 by Coragyps
11-08-2003 8:10 PM


quote:
I find it pretty odd that they're all smirking like someone just offstage had just farted loudly.....
No, noble men smile when good is done and their action saves the little helpless children, defenseless to save themselves.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 12 by Coragyps, posted 11-08-2003 8:10 PM Coragyps has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 17 by joshua221, posted 11-08-2003 8:41 PM Buzsaw has not replied
 Message 55 by nator, posted 11-10-2003 8:31 AM Buzsaw has not replied

Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 16 of 172 (65219)
11-08-2003 8:27 PM
Reply to: Message 11 by NosyNed
11-08-2003 8:08 PM


quote:
Abortion is not legally murder. That is the heart of the arguement. Attempts to use a religious point of view to change the legal definitions involved. A fertilized single cell is not currently defined as a human being. Murder is a specific form of killing a human being. Therefore abortion is not currently defined as being murder.
Ned, pardon my interjection, but'v you been reading? We're talking fully developed kids here. you can legally define til the cows come home but that doesn't aleviate the pain of torture or the fact of the brutal slaughter of an innocent helpless child a whit, does it?
[This message has been edited by buzsaw, 11-08-2003]

This message is a reply to:
 Message 11 by NosyNed, posted 11-08-2003 8:08 PM NosyNed has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024