Young earth creationism is valid and the macroevolutionary hypothesis is not valid

MrSir,
On you take sir I have to take the position of my parents and lover but to do so would make me fall into their (collective) opinion of me, that I am ill. I am not. It is all so simple I can rehearse this all in my sleep. I was dedicated to uncovering the cause of Change in the time it took the work snake to crawl from this side of the App MNTS to the OTHER side of the Mississippi. I could have cared less how long be aloted for that change but unless one insists my phyiscal capacity is not healthy there is no way but anti-Christian bias to explain how I could not continue at Cornell especially in their renewed promotion to "evolve" the faculty. Somehow unlike my Grandfather the professionals lost sight of the historical origin their profession. Gould did not make this mistake but would on my opnion have to admit that 1/2 his collegues are talking out their hat.

Ken you dont need to worry about any of these guys and gals I have come across here. Just stick to the facts, that's all one needs do-I believe I have mentioned this before But I have not followed out the consequences for a formal debateAbraham Pais 'Subtle is the Lord' Chapter 29 OF TENSORS AND A HEARING AID AND MANY OTHER THINGS:EINSTEIN'S COLLABORATORS p484 NUMBER TwO."Walter Ritz. b.1878, Sion Switzerland. Phd in Goettingen with Voigt, 1902. Privatdozen in Goettigen from 1908, the year in which he discovered the combination principle for line spectra. Ritz did not accept special relativity, but rather believed in the need to give up the notion of field described by partial differential equations (see 9P2), Sec.3). Ritz and Einstein published on very breif joint paper, written in April 1909. I strech the notion of collaboration by including it, since it is a tersly phrased joint communique' in which both men state what they have agreed to differ on. The issue was whether advanced and retarted solutions of the electromagnetic field equations are both admissible tyopes of solutions. 'Ritz considers the restriction to the...retarded potentials as one of the roots of the second law (of thermodynamics), whereas Einstein believes that the irreversibility rests excluisvely on probability grounds'."I would not call the posters here "retarded" biological cross level effect potentials in this sense (where Gould INSISTS on things) but I dont mind applying it to what seems to me a confusion of process and body in Pias or my own member (you name the part).